• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在与世隔绝村庄的结构化实验中对多种结果进行社会传染诱导。

Induction of social contagion for diverse outcomes in structured experiments in isolated villages.

作者信息

Airoldi Edoardo M, Christakis Nicholas A

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Operations, and Data Science, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

Data Science Institute, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2024 May 3;384(6695):eadi5147. doi: 10.1126/science.adi5147.

DOI:10.1126/science.adi5147
PMID:38696582
Abstract

Certain people occupy topological positions within social networks that enhance their effectiveness at inducing spillovers. We mapped face-to-face networks among 24,702 people in 176 isolated villages in Honduras and randomly assigned villages to targeting methods, varying the fraction of households receiving a 22-month health education package and the method by which households were chosen (randomly versus using the friendship-nomination algorithm). We assessed 117 diverse knowledge, attitude, and practice outcomes. Friendship-nomination targeting reduced the number of households needed to attain specified levels of village-wide uptake. Knowledge spread more readily than behavior, and spillovers extended to two degrees of separation. Outcomes that were intrinsically easier to adopt also manifested greater spillovers. Network targeting using friendship nomination effectively promotes population-wide improvements in welfare through social contagion.

摘要

某些人在社交网络中占据着拓扑位置,这增强了他们引发传播效应的能力。我们绘制了洪都拉斯176个与世隔绝村庄中24702人的面对面社交网络,并将村庄随机分配至不同的干预方法,改变接受为期22个月健康教育套餐的家庭比例以及选择家庭的方法(随机选择与使用友谊提名算法)。我们评估了117种不同的知识、态度和行为结果。基于友谊提名的干预方法减少了达到全村特定接受水平所需的家庭数量。知识的传播比行为更容易,且传播效应延伸至两个分隔度。本质上更容易采用的结果也表现出更大的传播效应。使用友谊提名的社交网络干预方法通过社会传播有效地促进了全人群的福利改善。

相似文献

1
Induction of social contagion for diverse outcomes in structured experiments in isolated villages.在与世隔绝村庄的结构化实验中对多种结果进行社会传染诱导。
Science. 2024 May 3;384(6695):eadi5147. doi: 10.1126/science.adi5147.
2
Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial.社交网络定位以实现人群行为改变最大化:一项整群随机对照试验
Lancet. 2015 Jul 11;386(9989):145-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60095-2. Epub 2015 May 4.
3
Algorithms for seeding social networks can enhance the adoption of a public health intervention in urban India.社交网络种子算法可以促进公共卫生干预措施在印度城市的采用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 26;119(30):e2120742119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120742119. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Exploiting social influence to magnify population-level behaviour change in maternal and child health: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of network targeting algorithms in rural Honduras.利用社会影响力扩大母婴健康领域的人群行为改变:洪都拉斯农村地区网络靶向算法随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 13;7(3):e012996. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012996.
5
Gut microbiome strain-sharing within isolated village social networks.孤立村庄社会网络中的肠道微生物菌株共享
Nature. 2025 Jan;637(8044):167-175. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08222-1. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
6
Community-directed mass drug administration is undermined by status seeking in friendship networks and inadequate trust in health advice networks.以社区为导向的大规模药物管理受到友谊网络中追求地位行为以及对健康建议网络信任不足的破坏。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jun;183:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
7
Social network analysis of food sharing among households in opisthorchiasis endemic villages of Lawa Lake, Thailand.泰国拉瓦湖华支睾吸虫病流行村庄家庭间食物共享的社会网络分析
Acta Trop. 2017 May;169:150-156. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
8
Impact of Sulabh Swasthya Yojna -- an attitude study.舒拉布健康计划的影响——一项态度研究。
Health Millions. 1993 Apr;1(2):21-4.
9
Social and Behavior Change Communication Interventions Delivered Face-to-Face and by a Mobile Phone to Strengthen Vaccination Uptake and Improve Child Health in Rural India: Randomized Pilot Study.面对面和通过移动电话实施的社会和行为改变沟通干预措施,以加强印度农村地区的疫苗接种率并改善儿童健康:随机试点研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 21;8(9):e20356. doi: 10.2196/20356.
10
Group-based parenting interventions to promote child development in rural Kenya: a multi-arm, cluster-randomised community effectiveness trial.基于群组的养育干预措施以促进肯尼亚农村地区儿童的发展:一项多臂、整群随机社区有效性试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Mar;9(3):e309-e319. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30469-1. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Network-cycle motif participation is associated with individual and collective wealth in Honduran villages.网络循环基序参与情况与洪都拉斯村庄中的个人财富和集体财富相关。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27680. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11087-7.
2
Fake news, real war.假新闻,真战争。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 11;3(1):104. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00267-w.
3
Social network cognition among isolated villagers reveals distinct patterns of bias.与世隔绝的村民的社交网络认知呈现出不同的偏见模式。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Aug;9(8):1529-1530. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02222-5.
4
Early insight into social network structure predicts climbing the social ladder.对社交网络结构的早期洞察预示着社会地位的提升。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jun 20;11(25):eads2133. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads2133.
5
Cognitive representations of social networks in isolated villages.偏远村庄中社交网络的认知表征。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02221-6.
6
Static network structure cannot stabilize cooperation among large language model agents.静态网络结构无法稳定大语言模型智能体之间的合作。
PLoS One. 2025 May 22;20(5):e0320094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320094. eCollection 2025.
7
Collective dynamics behind success.成功背后的集体动力。
Nat Commun. 2024 Dec 19;15(1):10701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54612-4.
8
Bringing leaders of network subgroups closer together does not facilitate consensus.让网络子群体的领导者走得更近并不能促进达成共识。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81636-z.
9
Gut microbiome strain-sharing within isolated village social networks.孤立村庄社会网络中的肠道微生物菌株共享
Nature. 2025 Jan;637(8044):167-175. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08222-1. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
10
Exploring vaccine hesitancy in digital public discourse: From tribal polarization to socio-economic disparities.探索数字公共话语中的疫苗犹豫:从部落极化到社会经济差距。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 5;19(11):e0308122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308122. eCollection 2024.