• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让网络子群体的领导者走得更近并不能促进达成共识。

Bringing leaders of network subgroups closer together does not facilitate consensus.

作者信息

Jones Matthew I, Christakis Nicholas A

机构信息

Yale Institute for Network Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81636-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-81636-z
PMID:39632953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11618600/
Abstract

Consensus formation is a complex process, particularly in networked groups. When individuals are incentivized to dig in and refuse to compromise, leaders may be essential to guiding the group to consensus. Specifically, the relative geodesic position of leaders could be important for reaching consensus. Separately, groups searching for consensus can be confounded by noisy signals in which individuals are given false information about the actions of their fellow group members. We tested the effects of the geodesic distance between leaders (geodesic distance ranging from 1 to 4) and of noise (noise levels at 0%, 5%, and 10%) by recruiting participants (N = 3,456) for a set of experiments (n = 216 groups). We find that noise makes groups less likely to reach consensus, and the groups that do reach consensus take longer to find it. We find that leadership changes the behavior of both leaders and followers in important ways (for instance, being labeled a leader makes people more likely to 'go with the flow'). However, we find no evidence that the geodesic distance between leaders is a significant factor in the probability of reaching consensus. While other network properties of leaders undoubtedly affect consensus formation, the distance between leaders in network subgroups appears not to matter.

摘要

共识形成是一个复杂的过程,尤其是在网络群体中。当个体受到激励而坚持己见并拒绝妥协时,领导者对于引导群体达成共识可能至关重要。具体而言,领导者的相对测地线位置对于达成共识可能很重要。另外,寻求共识的群体可能会被噪声信号所干扰,在这些信号中,个体被给予关于其他群体成员行为的虚假信息。我们通过招募参与者(N = 3456)进行了一组实验(n = 216个群体),测试了领导者之间的测地线距离(测地线距离范围为1至4)和噪声(噪声水平分别为0%、5%和10%)的影响。我们发现,噪声使群体达成共识的可能性降低,而那些确实达成共识的群体找到共识所需的时间更长。我们发现,领导力在重要方面改变了领导者和追随者的行为(例如,被标记为领导者会使人们更有可能“随波逐流”)。然而,我们没有发现证据表明领导者之间的测地线距离是达成共识概率的一个重要因素。虽然领导者的其他网络属性无疑会影响共识形成,但网络子群体中领导者之间的距离似乎并不重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/637c/11618600/445a8b62a80c/41598_2024_81636_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/637c/11618600/f012342046cd/41598_2024_81636_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/637c/11618600/136d04c1f1ce/41598_2024_81636_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/637c/11618600/f64c011e2b79/41598_2024_81636_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/637c/11618600/445a8b62a80c/41598_2024_81636_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/637c/11618600/f012342046cd/41598_2024_81636_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/637c/11618600/136d04c1f1ce/41598_2024_81636_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/637c/11618600/f64c011e2b79/41598_2024_81636_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/637c/11618600/445a8b62a80c/41598_2024_81636_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bringing leaders of network subgroups closer together does not facilitate consensus.让网络子群体的领导者走得更近并不能促进达成共识。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81636-z.
2
An investigation of the role of leadership in consensus decision-making.领导力在共识决策中作用的调查。
J Theor Biol. 2022 Jun 21;543:111094. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111094. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
3
Can good followers create unethical leaders? How follower citizenship leads to leader moral licensing and unethical behavior.优秀的追随者会造就不道德的领导者吗?追随者的公民行为如何导致领导者的道德许可和不道德行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Sep 21. doi: 10.1037/apl0000839.
4
The Relationship Between Perceived Leader Busyness and Perspective Taking and Interaction Behavior of Followers.领导者忙碌感与追随者的换位思考及互动行为之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 15;12:676810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.676810. eCollection 2021.
5
The evolution of leader-follower reciprocity: the theory of service-for-prestige.领导者-追随者互惠关系的演变:服务-威望理论。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 4;8:363. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00363. eCollection 2014.
6
Narcissistic leaders: An asset or a liability? Leader visibility, follower responses, and group-level absenteeism.自恋型领导者:资产还是负债?领导者可见度、追随者反应和群体缺勤率。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Jul;103(7):703-723. doi: 10.1037/apl0000298. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
7
What about the leader? Crossover of emotional exhaustion and work engagement from followers to leaders.那么领导者呢?从下属到领导者的情绪衰竭和工作投入的交叉。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;22(1):86-97. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000024. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
When followers become toxic.当追随者变得有害时。
Harv Bus Rev. 2004 Jan;82(1):54-60, 113.
10
Putting leaders in a bad mood: The affective costs of helping followers with personal problems.让领导心情不好:帮助下属解决个人问题的情感代价。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Apr;105(4):355-371. doi: 10.1037/apl0000450. Epub 2019 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Induction of social contagion for diverse outcomes in structured experiments in isolated villages.在与世隔绝村庄的结构化实验中对多种结果进行社会传染诱导。
Science. 2024 May 3;384(6695):eadi5147. doi: 10.1126/science.adi5147.
2
Containing misinformation: Modeling spatial games of fake news.包含错误信息:虚假新闻的空间博弈建模。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Feb 27;3(3):pgae090. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae090. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
The dual problems of coordination and anti-coordination on random bipartite graphs.随机二分图上的协调与反协调双重问题。
New J Phys. 2021 Nov;23(11). doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac3319. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
The microdynamics of spatial polarization: A model and an application to survey data from Ukraine.空间极化的微观动态:模型及对乌克兰调查数据的应用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104194118.
5
Random choices facilitate solutions to collective network coloring problems by artificial agents.随机选择有助于人工智能体解决集体网络着色问题。
iScience. 2021 Mar 24;24(4):102340. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102340. eCollection 2021 Apr 23.
6
Patterns of the COVID-19 pandemic spread around the world: exponential versus power laws.新冠疫情在全球传播的模式:指数增长与幂律分布。
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Sep;17(170):20200518. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0518. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Collective communication and behaviour in response to uncertain 'Danger' in network experiments.网络实验中对不确定“危险”的集体交流与行为
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 May;476(2237):20190685. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0685. Epub 2020 May 27.
8
I follow, therefore I lead: A longitudinal study of leader and follower identity and leadership in the marines.我追随,所以我引领:海军陆战队中领导者和追随者身份及领导的纵向研究。
Br J Psychol. 2018 Nov;109(4):708-723. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12312. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
The emergence of consensus: a primer.共识的形成:入门指南。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Feb 21;5(2):172189. doi: 10.1098/rsos.172189. eCollection 2018 Feb.
10
Locally noisy autonomous agents improve global human coordination in network experiments.在网络实验中,局部有噪声的自主主体可改善全球人类协调。
Nature. 2017 May 17;545(7654):370-374. doi: 10.1038/nature22332.