Nivel, Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Nov;48(21):4404-4413. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04047-5. Epub 2024 May 2.
Explantation is the proposed treatment for breast implant illness (BII). Little is known about which medical specialists are visited and what diagnoses are made before explantation is provided as the treatment.
This study investigated medical specialist care utilization in women with cosmetic breast implants who underwent explantation compared to women who chose breast implant replacement surgery and to women without breast implants.
Retrospective cohort study using data linkage with the Dutch Breast Implant Registry and the Dutch health insurance claims database. Visits to medical specialists were examined over the 3 years before explantation. A total of 832 explantation patients were matched and compared to 1463 breast implant replacement patients and 1664 women without breast implants.
Explantation patients were more likely to have visited > 5 different medical specialties compared to both replacement patients (12.3% vs. 5.7%; p < 0.001) and women without breast implants (12.3% vs. 3.7%; p < 0.001). Among explantation patients, women who underwent explantation because of BII were more likely to have visited > 5 different medical specialties compared to women who underwent explantation because of other reasons (25.0% vs. 11.0%; p < 0.001).
Women who underwent explantation of breast implants had higher utilization of medical specialist care in the years before explantation compared to women who underwent breast implant replacement surgery and women without breast implants. Medical specialist care use was especially high among women for whom BII was the registered reason for explantation. These findings suggest further research is needed into the link between BII and the use of medical specialist care.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
乳房植入体相关疾病(BII)的治疗方法是取出乳房植入体。但对于在提供乳房植入体取出术治疗之前,患者会先看哪些医学专家以及会被诊断出哪些疾病,目前知之甚少。
本研究调查了与选择乳房植入体置换手术和未接受乳房植入的女性相比,接受乳房植入体取出术的女性在就诊医学专家方面的情况。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用荷兰乳房植入物登记处和荷兰健康保险索赔数据库的数据进行链接。研究考察了乳房植入体取出术前 3 年的就诊情况。共纳入 832 例乳房植入体取出术患者,并与 1463 例乳房植入体置换术患者和 1664 例未接受乳房植入的女性进行了匹配。
与置换术患者(5.7%)和未接受乳房植入的女性(3.7%)相比,乳房植入体取出术患者更有可能就诊过>5 个不同的医学专科(12.3%;p<0.001)。在乳房植入体取出术患者中,因 BII 而行乳房植入体取出术的女性与因其他原因而行乳房植入体取出术的女性相比,更有可能就诊过>5 个不同的医学专科(25.0%比 11.0%;p<0.001)。
与接受乳房植入体置换术的女性和未接受乳房植入的女性相比,接受乳房植入体取出术的女性在乳房植入体取出术之前的几年中,对医学专家的服务利用率更高。在因 BII 而被记录为乳房植入体取出术原因的女性中,对医学专家的服务利用率尤其高。这些发现表明,需要进一步研究 BII 与使用医学专家服务之间的联系。
证据水平 III:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266。