Long Jixin, Peng Lanxin, Li Qian, Niu Lijing, Dai Haowei, Zhang Jiayuan, Chen Keyin, Lee Tatia Mc, Huang Meiyan, Zhang Ruibin
Laboratory of Cognitive Control and Brain Healthy, Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for Psychiatric Disorders, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine for Qingzhi Diseases, PR China.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Apr-Jun;24(2):100463. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100463. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
Research shows that the effect of acute stress on intentional memory suppression could be modulated by individual differences in psychological traits. However, whether acute stress distinctly affects intentional memory suppression in high trait ruminators, a high at-risk group of stress-related disorders, and the neural correlations, remains unclear.
55 healthy college students were divided into high and low trait ruminators (HTR and LTR), Following stress manipulation, a Think/No Think task assessed the memory suppression performance. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy was applied to explore the neural correlates. Psychophysiological interaction analyses were used to assess how the functional connectivity between a seed region and another brain region was modulated by tasks during memory suppression, further mediating memory suppression performance and state rumination.
The HTR exhibited poorer memory suppression performance than the LTR under the stress condition. Aberrant activation patterns and task-modulated functional connectivity in the dorsal prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) were observed only in the HTR during memory suppression under the stress condition. The effect of memory suppression performance on the state rumination of individuals was significantly mediated by the task-modulated functional connectivity between the DLPFC and STG.
The findings could provide insights for prevention or early intervention in the development of stress-related disorders in HTR.
研究表明,急性应激对有意记忆抑制的影响可能会受到心理特质个体差异的调节。然而,急性应激是否会对高特质反刍者(与应激相关障碍的高危人群)的有意记忆抑制产生明显影响以及神经相关性仍不清楚。
55名健康大学生被分为高特质反刍者和低特质反刍者(HTR和LTR),在应激操作后,通过“想/不想”任务评估记忆抑制表现。应用功能近红外光谱技术探索神经相关性。采用心理生理交互分析来评估在记忆抑制过程中,种子区域与另一个脑区之间的功能连接是如何被任务调节的,进而介导记忆抑制表现和状态反刍。
在应激条件下,HTR的记忆抑制表现比LTR差。在应激条件下的记忆抑制过程中,仅在HTR中观察到背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)和颞上回(STG)异常的激活模式和任务调节的功能连接。DLPFC和STG之间任务调节的功能连接显著介导了记忆抑制表现对个体状态反刍的影响。
这些发现可为预防或早期干预HTR中与应激相关障碍的发展提供见解。