Wang Chanyu, Song Xiaoqi, Lee Tatia M C, Zhang Ruibin
Laboratory of Cognitive Control and Brain Healthy, Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;10:824744. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.824744. eCollection 2022.
State rumination, unlike trait rumination which is described as a persistent and stable response style, is usually triggered by a specific stressful event and causes negative emotions within a short period of time. The measurement methods of trait rumination, such as the ruminative response scale (RRS), are therefore not fully applicable to state rumination. Recently, researchers have developed the brief state rumination inventory (BSRI) to characterize state rumination, addressing the gap in the field of accurate measurement of state rumination. To develop such an effective tool in the Chinese context, we developed a Chinese version of the BSRI and tested its psychometric properties. Two studies were conducted to address the research goal. In Study 1, we recruited 512 subjects, each of whom completed the Chinese version of the BSRI, RRS, emotional regulation questionnaire (ERQ), depression-anxiety-stress scale (DASS), and positive and negative affect scale (PANAS). Results showed that the scores of the BSRI were positively correlated with all other scale scores (s < 0.001), and the correlation with the RRS was the highest, indicating that the BSRI showed good convergent validity. Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the Chinese version of the BSRI was 0.93. Study 2 aimed to examine the ecological validity of the Chinese version of the BSRI. We recruited another 54 subjects who were randomly divided into two groups, with 27 in the rumination induction group and 27 in the distraction group, and recorded the BSRI scores of the two groups before and after a specific experiment. We found there was a significant increase in BSRI scores after rumination induction ( = 3.91, < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in the concrete distraction group before and after the experiment ( = 0.70, = 0.48). In sum, the Chinese version of the BSRI showed good reliability and validity for assessing state rumination in the general Chinese population.
状态性沉思与特质性沉思不同,特质性沉思被描述为一种持久且稳定的反应方式,而状态性沉思通常由特定的应激事件触发,并在短时间内引发负面情绪。因此,特质性沉思的测量方法,如沉思反应量表(RRS),并不完全适用于状态性沉思。最近,研究人员开发了简短状态性沉思量表(BSRI)来描述状态性沉思,填补了状态性沉思准确测量领域的空白。为了在中国背景下开发这样一种有效的工具,我们开发了BSRI的中文版并测试了其心理测量特性。进行了两项研究以实现研究目标。在研究1中,我们招募了512名受试者,每人都完成了BSRI中文版、RRS、情绪调节问卷(ERQ)、抑郁-焦虑-压力量表(DASS)以及正负性情绪量表(PANAS)。结果显示,BSRI得分与所有其他量表得分呈正相关(s < 0.001),且与RRS的相关性最高,表明BSRI具有良好的聚合效度。此外,BSRI中文版的克朗巴哈α系数为0.93。研究2旨在检验BSRI中文版的生态效度。我们又招募了54名受试者,将他们随机分为两组,沉思诱导组27人,分心组27人,并记录两组在特定实验前后的BSRI得分。我们发现,沉思诱导后BSRI得分显著增加( = 3.91, < 0.001),而具体分心组在实验前后无显著差异( = 0.70, = 0.48)。总之,BSRI中文版在评估中国普通人群的状态性沉思方面显示出良好的信度和效度。