• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对职场心理健康的群体健康方法:基本原理、实施与参与

A population health approach to workplace mental health: rationale, implementation and engagement.

作者信息

Woodard Kaylee T, Bailey Allison M, Esagoff Aaron I, Fragala Maren S, Hayward Joanna I, Hunter Jennifer L, Hsu Yea-Jen, Kim Paul M, Peters Matthew E, Carr Susan M

机构信息

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1336898. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1336898. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1336898
PMID:38699412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11064789/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe a population health-based program to support employee and dependent mental health and learn from engagement trends.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a program utilizing an assessment of mental health risk. For scoring "at risk," a Care Concierge is offered to connect users with resources.

RESULTS

Participation was offered to 56,442 employees and dependents. Eight thousand seven hundred thirty-one completed the assessment (15%). Of those, 4,644 (53%) scored moderate or higher. A total of 418 (9%) engaged the Care Concierge. Factors that negatively influenced the decision to engage care included bodily pain, financial concerns. Positive influences were younger age, high stress, anxiety, PTSD and low social support.

CONCLUSION

Proactive assessment plus access to a Care Concierge facilitates mental healthcare utilization. Several factors influence likelihood to engage in care. A better understanding of these factors may allow for more targeted outreach and improved engagement.

摘要

目的

描述一项基于人群健康的项目,以支持员工及其家属的心理健康,并从参与趋势中学习。

方法

对一个利用心理健康风险评估的项目进行回顾性分析。对于得分“有风险”的情况,提供一名护理礼宾员,以便将用户与资源联系起来。

结果

该项目向56442名员工及其家属提供了参与机会。8731人完成了评估(15%)。其中,4644人(53%)得分中等或更高。共有418人(9%)联系了护理礼宾员。对寻求护理的决定产生负面影响的因素包括身体疼痛、经济担忧。积极影响因素包括年龄较小、压力大、焦虑、创伤后应激障碍和社会支持度低。

结论

主动评估加上获得护理礼宾员的帮助有助于促进心理医疗服务的利用。有几个因素会影响接受护理的可能性。更好地理解这些因素可能有助于进行更有针对性的宣传并提高参与度。

相似文献

1
A population health approach to workplace mental health: rationale, implementation and engagement.一种针对职场心理健康的群体健康方法:基本原理、实施与参与
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1336898. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1336898. eCollection 2024.
2
Workplace Mental Health: Application of a Population Health Approach of Proactive Screening to Identify Risk and Engage in Care.职场心理健康:应用积极筛查的人群健康方法来识别风险并参与护理。
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Mar 1;63(3):244-250. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002116.
3
Facilitating Mental Health Treatment Through Proactive Screening and Concierge Services in the Workplace.通过在工作场所进行主动筛查和礼宾服务促进心理健康治疗。
J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Feb 1;65(2):160-166. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002707. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
4
Public Health Employees' Perception of Workplace Environment and Job Satisfaction: The Role of Local Health Departments' Engagement in Accreditation.公共卫生员工对工作环境和工作满意度的感知:地方卫生部门参与认证的作用。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 May/Jun;24 Suppl 3:S72-S79. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000581.
5
Beyond silence: protocol for a randomized parallel-group trial comparing two approaches to workplace mental health education for healthcare employees.超越沉默:一项随机平行组试验的方案,比较针对医护人员的两种工作场所心理健康教育方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 16;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0363-9.
6
Improving Employee Well-Being and Effectiveness: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Web-Based Psychological Interventions Delivered in the Workplace.改善员工福祉与效能:对工作场所提供的基于网络的心理干预措施的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 26;19(7):e271. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7583.
7
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
8
Early postdisaster health outreach to modern families: a cross-sectional study.灾后早期针对现代家庭的健康外展服务:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 17;5(12):e009402. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009402.
9
With a little help from my boss: The impact of workplace mental health training on leader behaviors and employee resource utilization.在老板的一点帮助下:工作场所心理健康培训对领导行为和员工资源利用的影响。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):4-19. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000126. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
10
The Contribution of Individual, Social and Work Characteristics to Employee Mental Health in a Coal Mining Industry Population.个体、社会和工作特征对煤矿行业员工心理健康的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0168445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168445. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Workplace Mental Health: Application of a Population Health Approach of Proactive Screening to Identify Risk and Engage in Care.职场心理健康:应用积极筛查的人群健康方法来识别风险并参与护理。
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Mar 1;63(3):244-250. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002116.
2
Mental health interventions and supports during COVID- 19 and other medical pandemics: A rapid systematic review of the evidence.新冠疫情和其他大流行病期间的心理健康干预措施和支持:证据的快速系统评价。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep-Oct;66:133-146. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
3
Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection prevention: a systematic umbrella review of the global evidence.预防感染的检疫和隔离的心理健康结果:全球证据的系统伞式综述。
Epidemiol Health. 2020;42:e2020038. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2020038. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
4
The Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 and Physical Distancing: The Need for Prevention and Early Intervention.新冠疫情及身体距离措施对心理健康的影响:预防与早期干预的必要性
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):817-818. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1562.
5
Economics and mental health: the current scenario.经济学与心理健康:当前状况
World Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;19(1):3-14. doi: 10.1002/wps.20692.
6
The effectiveness of workplace health promotion interventions on physical and mental health outcomes - a systematic review of reviews.工作场所健康促进干预措施对身心健康结果的有效性——系统评价综述。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Nov 1;45(6):546-559. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3833. Epub 2019 May 28.
7
The Working Mind: A Meta-Analysis of a Workplace Mental Health and Stigma Reduction Program.《工作思维:工作场所心理健康与减少污名化元分析》。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;64(1_suppl):39S-47S. doi: 10.1177/0706743719842559. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
Four-year review of presenteeism data among employees of a large United States health care system: a retrospective prevalence study.美国大型医疗保健系统员工出勤主义数据四年回顾:一项回顾性患病率研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Nov 9;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0321-9.
9
Neuroscience of Addiction: Relevance to Prevention and Treatment.成瘾神经科学:与预防和治疗的相关性。
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 1;175(8):729-740. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17101174. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
10
Effectiveness of training workplace managers to understand and support the mental health needs of employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis.培训工作场所管理人员了解和支持员工心理健康需求的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jun;75(6):462-470. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104789. Epub 2018 Mar 21.