Pediatric Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2024;49:307-326. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42398-7_14.
Cranial repair in children deserves particular attention since many issues are still controversial. Furthermore, literature data offer a confused picture of outcome of cranioplasty, in terms of results and complication rates, with studies showing inadequate follow-up and including populations that are not homogeneous by age of the patients, etiology, and size of the bone defect.Indeed, age has merged in the last years as a risk factor for resorption of autologous bone flap that is still the most frequent complication in cranial repair after decompressive craniectomy.Age-related factors play a role also when alloplastic materials are used. In fact, the implantation of alloplastic materials is limited by skull growth under 7 years of age and is contraindicated in the first years if life. Thus, the absence of an ideal material for cranioplasty is even more evident in children with a steady risk of complications through the entire life of the patient that is usually much longer than surgical follow-up.As a result, specific techniques should be adopted according to the age of the patient and etiology of the defect, aiming to repair the skull and respect its residual growth.Thus, autologous bone still represents the best option for cranial repair, though limitations exist. As an alternative, biomimetic materials should ideally warrant the possibility to overcome the limits of other inert alloplastic materials by favoring osteointegration or osteoinduction or both.On these grounds, this paper aims to offer a thorough overview of techniques, materials, and peculiar issues of cranial repair in children.
儿童颅骨修复需要特别关注,因为许多问题仍存在争议。此外,文献资料显示颅骨修复的结果和并发症发生率存在混乱,研究显示随访不充分,且纳入的患者群体在年龄、病因和骨缺损大小方面并不均一。
事实上,年龄近年来已成为自体骨瓣吸收的一个危险因素,而自体骨瓣吸收仍然是去骨瓣减压术后颅骨修复最常见的并发症。
当使用同种异体材料时,与年龄相关的因素也起着作用。事实上,同种异体材料的植入受到 7 岁以下颅骨生长的限制,如果患者在生命的最初几年内需要颅骨修复,则不建议使用。因此,对于儿童来说,理想的颅骨修复材料仍然缺失,因为他们在整个患者生命周期内都存在稳定的并发症风险,而这个生命周期通常比手术随访时间长得多。
因此,根据患者的年龄和缺损的病因,应采用特定的技术来修复颅骨并尊重其残余生长。
因此,自体骨仍然是颅骨修复的最佳选择,尽管存在一些限制。作为替代方案,仿生材料应理想地通过促进骨整合、骨诱导或两者兼用来克服其他惰性同种异体材料的限制。
基于这些原因,本文旨在全面概述儿童颅骨修复的技术、材料和特殊问题。