Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Department of Internal Medicine, HCA Florida Sarasota Doctors Hospital, Sarasota, Florida.
Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jul 1;222:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.049. Epub 2024 May 1.
Previous studies have shown an association between acute limb ischemia and higher mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Although peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a well-known risk factor for development of macrovascular pathology, the effect of its severity is not well investigated in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Using a national cohort of patients with various degrees of PAD, we investigated in-hospital outcomes in patients who were admitted for ACS. Using the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database, we queried all patients who were hospitalized for ACS (unstable angina, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction). Patients were further divided into 3 groups, either no PAD (non-PAD), PAD, or critical limb ischemia (CLI). Multivariable models were designed to adjust for patient and hospital factors and examine the association between ACS and PAD severity. Of approximately 3,834,181 hospitalizations for ACS, 6.4% had PAD, 0.2% had CLI, and all others were non-PAD. After risk adjustment, in-hospital mortality was higher by 24% in PAD (adjusted odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21 to 1.28) and 86% in CLI (adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.09) compared with non-PAD. Furthermore, PAD and CLI were linked to 1.23-fold (95% CI 1.20 to 1.26) and 1.67-fold (95% CI 1.45 to 1.86) greater odds of cardiogenic shock compared with non-PAD. Additionally, PAD and CLI were linked with higher odds of mechanical circulatory support usage, cardiac arrest and acute kidney injury compared with non-PAD. Lastly, duration of hospital stay, hospitalization costs and odds of non-home discharge and 30-day readmissions were greater in patients with PAD and CLI compared with non-PAD. PAD severity was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with ACS, including in-hospital mortality and resource utilization.
先前的研究表明,急性肢体缺血与急性心肌梗死患者的死亡率升高有关。尽管外周动脉疾病(PAD)是大血管病理发展的已知危险因素,但在因急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)住院的患者中,其严重程度的影响尚未得到充分研究。利用一个具有不同程度 PAD 的全国性患者队列,我们研究了因 ACS 入院的患者的住院期间结局。我们利用 2016 年至 2020 年全国再入院数据库,查询了所有因 ACS(不稳定型心绞痛、非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死)住院的患者。患者进一步分为 3 组,即无 PAD(非 PAD)、PAD 或严重肢体缺血(CLI)。设计多变量模型以调整患者和医院因素,并检查 ACS 与 PAD 严重程度之间的关联。在约 3834181 例 ACS 住院患者中,6.4%有 PAD,0.2%有 CLI,其余均为非 PAD。经过风险调整后,PAD 的住院死亡率高出 24%(调整后的优势比 1.24,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.21 至 1.28),CLI 的住院死亡率高出 86%(调整后的优势比 1.86,95% CI 1.62 至 2.09)。此外,PAD 和 CLI 与心源性休克的比值比分别为 1.23 倍(95%CI 1.20 至 1.26)和 1.67 倍(95%CI 1.45 至 1.86)。此外,与非 PAD 相比,PAD 和 CLI 与机械循环支持使用率、心脏骤停和急性肾损伤的几率增加有关。最后,与非 PAD 相比,PAD 和 CLI 患者的住院时间、住院费用、非家庭出院和 30 天再入院的几率更高。PAD 严重程度与 ACS 患者的临床结局恶化有关,包括住院死亡率和资源利用。