• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌梗死后合并心源性休克患者外周动脉疾病的转归。

Outcomes Associated With Peripheral Artery Disease in Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA; Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Division of Cardiology, New York University Langone Health & Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Apr 5;79(13):1223-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.037.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.037
PMID:35361344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9172933/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mortality rates for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) remain high despite advances in revascularization strategies and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to elucidate the association between comorbid lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) and outcomes in CS and AMI.

METHODS

PAD status was defined in Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with CS and AMI from October 1, 2015 to June 30, 2018. Primary outcomes ascertained through December 31, 2018 included in- and out-of-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included bleeding, amputation, stroke, and lower extremity revascularization. Multivariable regression models with adjustment for confounders were used to estimate risk. Subgroup analyses included patients treated with MCS and those who underwent coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

Among 71,690 patients, 5.9% (N = 4,259) had PAD. Mean age was 77.8 ± 7.9 years, 58.7% were male, and 84.3% were White. Cumulative in-hospital mortality was 47.2%, with greater risk among those with PAD (56.3% vs 46.6% without PAD; adjusted OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.40-1.59). PAD patients also had greater risk of in-hospital amputation (1.6% vs 0.2%; adjusted OR: 7.0; 95% CI: 5.26-9.37) and out-of-hospital mortality (67.9% vs 40.7%; adjusted HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.67-1.90). MCS was less frequently utilized in PAD patients (21.5% vs 38.6% without PAD; P < 0.001) and was associated with higher mortality, need for lower extremity revascularization, and amputation risk. Findings were consistent in patients who underwent coronary revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients presenting with AMI and CS, PAD was associated with worse limb outcomes and survival. In addition to lower MCS utilization rates, those with PAD who received MCS had increased mortality, lower extremity revascularization, and amputation rates.

摘要

背景

尽管在血运重建策略和机械循环支持(MCS)设备方面取得了进展,患有急性心肌梗死(AMI)和心源性休克(CS)的患者的死亡率仍然很高。

目的

本研究旨在阐明合并下肢外周动脉疾病(PAD)与 CS 和 AMI 患者预后之间的关系。

方法

2015 年 10 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 30 日,在 Medicare 受益人因 CS 和 AMI 住院期间确定 PAD 状态。通过 2018 年 12 月 31 日确定的主要预后包括院内和院外死亡率。次要预后包括出血、截肢、卒中和下肢血运重建。使用多变量回归模型调整混杂因素来估计风险。亚组分析包括接受 MCS 治疗和接受冠状动脉血运重建的患者。

结果

在 71690 名患者中,5.9%(N=4259)患有 PAD。平均年龄为 77.8±7.9 岁,58.7%为男性,84.3%为白人。住院期间的累积死亡率为 47.2%,PAD 患者的风险更高(56.3% vs 46.6%无 PAD;调整后的 OR:1.50;95%CI:1.40-1.59)。PAD 患者也有更高的住院期间截肢风险(1.6% vs 0.2%;调整后的 OR:7.0;95%CI:5.26-9.37)和院外死亡率(67.9% vs 40.7%;调整后的 HR:1.78;95%CI:1.67-1.90)。PAD 患者的 MCS 使用率较低(21.5% vs 38.6%无 PAD;P<0.001),且与死亡率较高、需要下肢血运重建和截肢风险相关。在接受冠状动脉血运重建的患者中,发现结果一致。

结论

在患有 AMI 和 CS 的患者中,PAD 与较差的肢体预后和生存相关。除了较低的 MCS 使用率外,接受 MCS 的 PAD 患者死亡率更高,需要下肢血运重建和截肢率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/7ed15802cb15/nihms-1778870-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/f793814f520c/nihms-1778870-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/8fadbbcc149f/nihms-1778870-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/3222dd323a39/nihms-1778870-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/7a06e1461ff2/nihms-1778870-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/7ed15802cb15/nihms-1778870-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/f793814f520c/nihms-1778870-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/8fadbbcc149f/nihms-1778870-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/3222dd323a39/nihms-1778870-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/7a06e1461ff2/nihms-1778870-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/110d/9172933/7ed15802cb15/nihms-1778870-f0011.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes Associated With Peripheral Artery Disease in Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.心肌梗死后合并心源性休克患者外周动脉疾病的转归。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Apr 5;79(13):1223-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.037.
2
Revascularization Practices and Outcomes in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Who Presented With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock in the US, 2009-2018.2009-2018 年美国急性心肌梗死伴心原性休克多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建实践和结局。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1317-1327. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3276.
3
Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.美国急性心肌梗死合并非梗死相关心原性休克患者应用机械循环支持治疗的趋势和院内死亡率。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Apr;107(4):287-303. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1182-2. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
5
Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的管理和结局的性别差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar 28;15(6):642-652. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.12.033.
6
Cardiogenic Shock in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: An 8-Year National Perspective on Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes.心尖球形综合征与急性心肌梗死所致心原性休克的临床特征、处理和预后的 8 年全国性观察研究
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;7(6):469-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 May 8.
7
Hospital market concentration and the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.医院市场集中化与机械循环支持装置在伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死中的应用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 19;22(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07458-1.
8
Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndrome.外周动脉疾病患者因急性冠状动脉综合征住院的临床结局和资源利用。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jul 1;222:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.049. Epub 2024 May 1.
9
Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持装置的情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037748. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37748.
10
Characteristics of High-Performing Hospitals in Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.心梗后心源性休克高绩效医院的特征。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jun 15;221:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.002. Epub 2024 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Inpatient Outcomes for Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction.因急性心肌梗死住院的外周动脉疾病患者的住院结局
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):e040526. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040526. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Impella Versus VA-ECMO for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Italian Context.意大利背景下因心源性休克患者使用Impella与VA-ECMO的初步成本效益分析
Cardiol Ther. 2025 Jun;14(2):183-198. doi: 10.1007/s40119-025-00404-w. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
3
Predictors and Impact of Cardiogenic Shock in Oldest-Old ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Blood Lipid Management in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease.外周动脉疾病患者的血脂管理效果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 22;77(24):3016-3027. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.060.
2
Rationale and Design of the SAFE-PAD Study.SAFE-PAD 研究的原理和设计。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jan;14(1):e007040. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007040. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
3
Comparability of Event Adjudication Versus Administrative Billing Claims for Outcome Ascertainment in the DAPT Study: Findings From the EXTEND-DAPT Study.
高龄ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者心源性休克的预测因素及影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 14;14(2):504. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020504.
4
Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies for Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Diabetic States.糖尿病状态下心肌缺血再灌注损伤的机制及治疗策略
ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2024 Nov 1;7(12):3691-3717. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.4c00272. eCollection 2024 Dec 13.
5
Comparative analysis of cardiogenic shock outcomes in acute myocardial infarction with polyvascular disease.急性心肌梗死合并多血管疾病时心源性休克结局的比较分析
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Aug 31;46:100452. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100452. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Nomogram prediction model for the risk of intracranial hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后颅内出血转化风险的列线图预测模型
Front Neurol. 2024 Mar 7;15:1361035. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1361035. eCollection 2024.
7
Assessment and Management of Older Adults Undergoing PCI, Part 1: A Expert Panel.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年人的评估与管理,第1部分:专家小组。
JACC Adv. 2023 Jun;2(4). doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100389.
8
Position Statement on Vascular Access Safety for Percutaneous Devices in AMI Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者经皮装置血管通路安全性立场声明
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct 24;15(20):2003-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.08.041.
在 DAPT 研究中,通过事件裁定与行政计费索赔进行结果判定的可比性:来自 EXTEND-DAPT 研究的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jan;14(1):e006589. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006589. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Revascularization Practices and Outcomes in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Who Presented With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock in the US, 2009-2018.2009-2018 年美国急性心肌梗死伴心原性休克多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建实践和结局。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1317-1327. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3276.
5
Deploying Mechanical Circulatory Support Via the Axillary Artery in Cardiogenic Shock and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经腋动脉部署机械循环支持在心源休克和高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Aug 1;128:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.04.039. Epub 2020 May 19.
6
Comparison of Clinical Trials and Administrative Claims to Identify Stroke Among Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: Findings From the EXTEND Study.比较临床试验和行政索赔以识别接受主动脉瓣置换术的患者中的中风:EXTEND 研究的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov;12(11):e008231. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008231. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Procedural Success Rates and Mortality in Elderly Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock.老年心原性休克患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的程序成功率和死亡率。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1853-1859. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.027.
8
Alternative Percutaneous Access for Large Bore Devices.大口径器械的替代经皮入路。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun;12(6):e007707. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007707. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
9
Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.心肌梗死后合并心源性休克患者短期非耐久性机械循环支持的应用在医院间的差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan;12(1):e007270. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007270.
10
National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.机械循环支持治疗心原性休克的全国趋势、使用预测因素和院内结局。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Apr 6;13(18):e2152-e2159. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00947.