Byard Roger W
School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Level 2, Room N237, Helen Mayo North, Frome Road, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 May 4. doi: 10.1007/s12024-024-00824-5.
The well-established epidemiological and neuropathological differences between infants who die alone compared to those in shared sleeping environments indicate that these cohorts have differences. Risk factors in both situations depend on both exogenous and endogenous factors. Although parental consumption of alcohol continues to be cited as a risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) it is difficult to understand how a substance which impairs parental consciousness rather than infant arousal could contribute to SIDS. Surely a more logical mechanism to explain these deaths would be suffocation by a sedated adult rather than evoking predisposing factors for SIDS.
与同床睡眠环境中的婴儿相比,独自死亡的婴儿在流行病学和神经病理学方面存在已被充分证实的差异,这表明这些群体存在差异。两种情况下的风险因素都取决于外源性和内源性因素。尽管父母饮酒一直被视为婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)的一个风险因素,但很难理解一种损害父母意识而非婴儿觉醒的物质如何会导致SIDS。当然,解释这些死亡的更合理机制应该是镇静的成年人导致窒息,而不是引发SIDS的易感因素。