Suppr超能文献

用于降低婴儿猝死综合征风险的婴儿安抚奶嘴。

Infant pacifiers for reduction in risk of sudden infant death syndrome.

作者信息

Psaila Kim, Foster Jann P, Pulbrook Neil, Jeffery Heather E

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, DC, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith DC, Australia.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 5;4(4):CD011147. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011147.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has been most recently defined as the sudden unexpected death of an infant less than one year of age, with onset of the fatal episode apparently occurring during sleep, that remains unexplained after a thorough investigation, including the performance of a complete autopsy and a review of the circumstances of death and clinical history. Despite the success of several prevention campaigns, SIDS remains a leading cause of infant mortality. In 1994, a 'triple risk model' for SIDS was proposed that described SIDS as an event that results from the intersection of three factors: a vulnerable infant; a critical development period in homeostatic control (age related); and an exogenous stressor. The association between pacifier (dummy) use and reduced incidence of SIDS has been shown in epidemiological studies since the early 1990s. Pacifier use, given its low cost, might be a cost-effective intervention for SIDS prevention if it is confirmed effective in randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the use of pacifiers during sleep versus no pacifier during sleep reduces the risk of SIDS.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 2), MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL to 16 March 2016. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Published and unpublished controlled trials using random and quasi-random allocations of infants born at term and at preterm (less than 37 weeks' gestation) or with low birth weight (< 2500 g). Infants must have been randomised by one month' postmenstrual age. We planned to include studies reported only by abstracts, and cluster and cross-over randomised trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed studies from searches. We found no eligible studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified no randomised controlled trials examining infant pacifiers for reduction in risk of SIDS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no randomised control trial evidence on which to support or refute the use of pacifiers for the prevention of SIDS.

摘要

背景

婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)最近被定义为1岁以下婴儿的意外突然死亡,致命事件显然发生在睡眠期间,经过全面调查,包括完整尸检以及对死亡情况和临床病史的审查后仍无法解释。尽管多项预防运动取得了成功,但SIDS仍然是婴儿死亡的主要原因。1994年,有人提出了SIDS的“三重风险模型”,将SIDS描述为一个由三个因素交叉导致的事件:脆弱的婴儿;稳态控制中的关键发育阶段(与年龄有关);以及外部应激源。自20世纪90年代初以来,流行病学研究表明使用安抚奶嘴(橡皮奶头)与SIDS发病率降低之间存在关联。鉴于其成本低廉,如果在随机对照试验中证实有效,使用安抚奶嘴可能是一种具有成本效益的SIDS预防干预措施。

目的

确定睡眠期间使用安抚奶嘴与不使用安抚奶嘴相比是否能降低SIDS风险。

检索方法

我们采用Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准检索策略,检索截至2016年3月16日的Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL 2016年第2期)、通过PubMed检索的MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL。我们还检索了临床试验数据库、会议论文集以及检索到的文章的参考文献列表,以查找随机对照试验和半随机试验。

选择标准

已发表和未发表的对照试验,采用随机和半随机分配方法,纳入足月出生以及早产(妊娠少于37周)或低出生体重(<2500克)的婴儿。婴儿必须在月经龄1个月时进行随机分组。我们计划纳入仅以摘要形式报告的研究以及整群和交叉随机试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立审查检索到的研究。我们未找到符合条件的研究。

主要结果

我们未识别出任何关于使用婴儿安抚奶嘴降低SIDS风险的随机对照试验。

作者结论

我们未找到支持或反驳使用安抚奶嘴预防SIDS的随机对照试验证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验