Calik Jacek, Zawada Tomasz, Sauer Natalia, Bove Torsten
Old Town Clinic, Wszystkich Świętych 2a, 50-127, Wrocław, Poland.
Department of Clinical Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wrocław, Poland.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 May;14(5):1189-1210. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01163-7. Epub 2024 May 4.
In dermatology, inflammatory skin conditions impose a substantial burden worldwide, with existing therapies showing limited efficacy and side effects. This report aims to compare a novel immunological activation induced by hyperthermic 20 MHz high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with conventional cryotherapy. The bioeffects from the two methods are initially investigated by numerical models, and subsequently compared to clinical observations after treatment of a patient with the inflammatory disease granuloma annulare (GA).
Clinical responses to moderate energy HIFU and cryotherapy were analysed using numerical models. HIFU-induced pressure and heat transfer were calculated, and a three-layer finite element model simulated temperature distribution and necrotic volume in the skin. Model output was compared to 22 lesions treated with HIFU and 10 with cryotherapy in a patient with GA.
Cryotherapy produced a necrotic volume of 138.5 mm at - 92.7 °C. HIFU at 0.3-0.6 J/exposure and focal depths of 0.8 or 1.3 mm generated necrotic volumes up to only 15.99 mm at temperatures of 68.3-81.2 °C. HIFU achieved full or partial resolution in all treated areas, confirming its hyperthermic immunological activation effect, while cryotherapy also resolved lesions but led to scarring and dyspigmentation.
Hyperthermic immunological activation of 20 MHz HIFU shows promise for treating inflammatory skin conditions as exemplified by GA. Numerical models demonstrate minimal skin necrosis compared to cryotherapy. Suggested optimal HIFU parameters are 1.3 mm focal depth, 0.4-0.5 J/exposure, 1 mm spacing, and 1 mm margin. Further studies on GA and other inflammatory diseases are recommended.
在皮肤科领域,炎症性皮肤病在全球范围内造成了沉重负担,现有疗法疗效有限且存在副作用。本报告旨在比较高温20兆赫高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)诱导的新型免疫激活与传统冷冻疗法。首先通过数值模型研究这两种方法的生物效应,随后将其与环状肉芽肿(GA)这一炎症性疾病患者治疗后的临床观察结果进行比较。
使用数值模型分析中度能量HIFU和冷冻疗法的临床反应。计算HIFU诱导的压力和热传递,并采用三层有限元模型模拟皮肤中的温度分布和坏死体积。将模型输出结果与一名GA患者中接受HIFU治疗的22个皮损以及接受冷冻疗法治疗的10个皮损进行比较。
冷冻疗法在-92.7°C时产生的坏死体积为138.5立方毫米。在0.3 - 0.6焦耳/次暴露且聚焦深度为0.8或1.3毫米的情况下,HIFU在68.3 - 81.2°C的温度下产生的坏死体积仅为15.99立方毫米。HIFU在所有治疗区域均实现了完全或部分消退,证实了其高温免疫激活作用,而冷冻疗法虽也使皮损消退,但导致了瘢痕形成和色素沉着。
20兆赫HIFU的高温免疫激活在治疗如GA所示的炎症性皮肤病方面显示出前景。数值模型表明与冷冻疗法相比皮肤坏死最小。建议的最佳HIFU参数为聚焦深度1.3毫米、暴露能量0.4 - 0.5焦耳、间距1毫米和边缘宽度毫米。建议对GA和其他炎症性疾病进行进一步研究。