Zhang Fuquan, Carey Rachel E, Brattain Rebecca S, Wehrle Herman, Penner Gregory B
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CanadaS7N 5A8.
KWS Cereals USA, LLC, Champaign, IL 61822, USA.
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Apr 11;8:txae059. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae059. eCollection 2024.
The objectives were to compare cereal grain and straw yield between barley and hybrid rye () and to evaluate whether the inclusion of dry-rolled HR grain as a replacement for barley grain affected feed intake and growth for growing cattle, and feed intake, growth, and carcass characteristics for finishing cattle. Crop yield was measured by directly weighing harvested grain and straw bales ( = 3 plots/grain type). Three-hundred sixty steers with an initial body weight () of 348 ± 40 kg were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to 1 of the 24 pens during the growing phase ( = 8; 65 d). The control diet () included 60.22% barley grain with HR included by replacing 50 () or 100% () of the barley grain on a dry matter () basis. Steers were re-randomized for the finishing phase ( = 6; 118 d) and treatments included a control diet containing 88.60% barley grain () with HR replacing 33 (), 67 (), or 100% () of the barley grain (DM basis). The grain yield was greater ( = 0.04) and straw yield tended ( = 0.06) to be less for HR than barley. There were no effects of HR inclusion on DM intake (DMI) or G:F during the growing phase, but average daily gain (ADG) responded quadratically ( = 0.02) with cattle fed 50% HR having the greatest gain. During finishing, DMI decreased linearly as HR grain inclusion increased ( < 0.01). ADG initially increased from FCON to FLOW followed by a decrease with increasing HR inclusion (quadratic, < 0.01), but G:F was not affected. Hot carcass weight was greatest for FCON with the magnitude of difference between FCON and the HR treatments increasing with increasing inclusion of HR (quadratic, = 0.02). There was a linear increase in dressing percentage ( = 0.02) and a linear reduction in back fat thickness ( = 0.04) with increasing inclusion of HR. Increasing the inclusion of HR during finishing cubically ( < 0.01) affected the proportion of minor and severe liver abscesses with an average of 34.60% severely abscessed livers when HR was included compared to 11.11% for BCON. HR may have greater grain yield than barley, and partial replacement of barley grain with HR may improve ADG without affecting DMI or G:F during the growing phase. However, replacing barley grain in finishing diets with HR decreases DMI, and increases the risk of minor and severe liver abscesses, but does not affect feed conversion, suggesting HR should not replace more than 33% of the barley grain to maintain ADG.
本研究旨在比较大麦和杂交黑麦()的谷物产量和秸秆产量,并评估用干压片黑麦谷物替代大麦谷物对生长育肥牛的采食量和生长性能,以及育肥牛的采食量、生长性能和胴体特性的影响。通过直接称量收获的谷物和秸秆捆来测定作物产量(= 3个样地/谷物类型)。360头初始体重()为348 ± 40 kg的阉牛按体重分层,在生长阶段随机分配到24个栏舍中的1个(= 8;65天)。对照日粮()包含60.22%的大麦谷物,黑麦通过以干物质()为基础替代50%()或100%()的大麦谷物来添加。阉牛在育肥阶段重新随机分组(= 6;118天),处理包括一种对照日粮,其含有88.60%的大麦谷物(),黑麦分别替代33%()、67%()或100%()的大麦谷物(干物质基础)。黑麦的谷物产量更高(= 0.04),秸秆产量则有低于大麦的趋势(= 0.06)。在生长阶段,添加黑麦对干物质采食量(DMI)或料重比(G:F)没有影响,但平均日增重(ADG)呈二次曲线响应(= 0.02),饲喂50%黑麦的牛增重最大。在育肥阶段,随着黑麦谷物添加量的增加,DMI呈线性下降(< 0.01)。ADG最初从FCON到FLOW增加,随后随着黑麦添加量的增加而下降(二次曲线,< 0.01),但料重比不受影响。热胴体重以FCON最大,FCON与黑麦处理之间的差异幅度随着黑麦添加量的增加而增大(二次曲线,= 0.02)。随着黑麦添加量的增加,屠宰率呈线性增加(= 0.02),背膘厚度呈线性减少(= 0.04)。育肥阶段黑麦添加量的立方增加(< 0.01)影响轻度和重度肝脓肿的比例,与BCON的11.11%相比,添加黑麦时平均有34.60%的肝脏严重脓肿。黑麦的谷物产量可能高于大麦,在生长阶段用黑麦部分替代大麦谷物可提高ADG,而不影响DMI或G:F。然而,在育肥日粮中用黑麦替代大麦谷物会降低DMI,并增加轻度和重度肝脓肿的风险,但不影响饲料转化率,这表明为维持ADG,黑麦替代大麦谷物的比例不应超过33%。