• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版护生专业应对量表的编制与信效度检验。

Development and validation of the hospice professional coping scale among Chinese nurses.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hubei Clinical Research Center for Critical Care Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China.

Department of Lung Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 20;24(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10970-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-10970-9
PMID:38643136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11031935/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospice care professionals often experience trauma patient deaths and multiple patient deaths in a short period of time (more so than other nurses). This repeated exposure to the death process and the death of patients leads to greater psychological pressure on hospice care professionals. But at present, people pay more attention to the feelings and care burden of the family members of dying patients but pay less attention to medical staff. Thus, this study aimed to develop a scale on the burden of care for hospice care providers and assess the coping capacity of hospice professionals. Raising awareness of the psychological burden of hospice professionals.

METHODS

Through a literature review, research group discussion, Delphi method and a pre-survey of professional coping skills among nurses, 200 hospice professionals who had received training in hospice care from pilot institutions engaged in or providing hospice care were selected for investigation. Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half reliability were used to test the internal consistency of the scale, and content validity and explore factor analysis (EFA) were used to test the construct validity of the scale.

RESULTS

Two rounds of Delphi methods were carried out, and the effective recovery rate was 100%. The expert authority coefficients of the two rounds were 0.838 and 0.833, respectively. The Kendall's W coefficient of experts in the first round was 0.121 ~ 0.200 (P < 0.05), and the Kendall's W coefficient of the second round was 0.115-0.136 (P < 0.05), indicating a good level of expert coordination. The final survey scale for the care burden of hospice professionals included four dimensions-working environment (9 items), professional roles (8 items), clinical nursing (9 items) and psychological burden (7 items)-with a total of 33 items. The total Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.963, and the Cronbach's α coefficients of the working environment, professional roles, clinical nursing and psychological burden dimensions were 0.920, 0.889, 0.936 and 0.910, respectively. The total split-half reliability of the scale was 0.927, and the split-half reliability of each dimension was 0.846, 0.817, 0.891, and 0.832. The content validity of the scale items ranged from 0.90 to 1.00. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 5 common factors, with a total cumulative contribution rate of 68.878%. The common degree of each item in the scale was > 0.4, and the factor loading of each item was also > 0.4.

CONCLUSION

The scale is an open-access, short, easy-to-administer scale. And which for assessing hospice care burden among hospice professionals developed in this study demonstrated strong reliability and validity. This tool can serve as a dependable instrument for evaluating the burden of hospice care for terminally ill patients by professionals in the hospice setting.

摘要

背景

临终关怀专业人员经常在短时间内经历创伤患者死亡和多名患者死亡(比其他护士更多)。这种反复接触死亡过程和患者死亡会给临终关怀专业人员带来更大的心理压力。但目前,人们更多地关注临终患者家属的感受和护理负担,而较少关注医务人员。因此,本研究旨在开发一种临终关怀提供者护理负担量表,并评估临终关怀专业人员的应对能力。提高对临终关怀专业人员心理负担的认识。

方法

通过文献回顾、研究小组讨论、德尔菲法和对试点机构从事或提供临终关怀的护士专业应对技能的预调查,选择 200 名接受过临终关怀培训的临终关怀专业人员进行调查。采用克朗巴赫α系数和分半信度检验量表的内部一致性,采用内容效度和探索性因素分析(EFA)检验量表的结构效度。

结果

进行了两轮德尔菲法,有效回收率为 100%。两轮专家权威系数分别为 0.838 和 0.833。第一轮专家 Kendall's W 系数为 0.1210.200(P<0.05),第二轮专家 Kendall's W 系数为 0.115-0.136(P<0.05),表明专家协调性较好。临终关怀专业人员护理负担最终调查量表包括工作环境(9 项)、专业角色(8 项)、临床护理(9 项)和心理负担(7 项)四个维度,共 33 项。量表的总克朗巴赫α系数为 0.963,工作环境、专业角色、临床护理和心理负担维度的克朗巴赫α系数分别为 0.920、0.889、0.936 和 0.910。量表的总半分信度为 0.927,各维度的半分信度分别为 0.846、0.817、0.891 和 0.832。量表项目的内容效度为 0.901.00。探索性因素分析显示有 5 个公因子,累计贡献率为 68.878%。量表各项目的共性度均>0.4,各项目的因子负荷也均>0.4。

结论

该量表是一种开放获取、简短、易于管理的量表。本研究开发的用于评估临终关怀专业人员临终关怀负担的量表具有较强的信度和效度。该工具可作为评估临终关怀机构中专业人员对终末期患者护理负担的可靠工具。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the hospice professional coping scale among Chinese nurses.中文版护生专业应对量表的编制与信效度检验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 20;24(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10970-9.
2
[Development of a risk assessment scale and test of its validity and reliability for venous thromboembolism in adult burn patients].[成人烧伤患者静脉血栓栓塞症风险评估量表的研制及其效度和信度检验]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 20;38(8):778-787. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210322-00098.
3
Development, validation and reliability testing of the hospice care environment scale.临终关怀环境量表的编制、验证与信度检验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 May 28;23(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01450-2.
4
Development of death education training content for adult cancer patients: A mixed methods study.成人癌症患者死亡教育培训内容的开发:一项混合方法研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Dec;27(23-24):4400-4410. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14595. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
5
Nurses' Empowerment Scale for ICU patients' families: an instrument development study.重症监护病房患者家属的护士赋权量表:一项工具开发研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2016 Sep;21(5):e11-21. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12106. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
6
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
7
Development and validation of an infectious disease control competency scale for public health professionals.公共卫生专业人员传染病控制能力量表的编制与验证。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Sep 26;9(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00381-y.
8
The Outpatient Experience Questionnaire of comprehensive public hospital in China: development, validity and reliability.中国综合公立医院门诊患者体验问卷:编制、效度与信度
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Feb 1;29(1):40-46. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw133.
9
Development and Validation of the Home Hospice Care Needs Questionnaire for the Dying Old Adult (HHCNQ-DE) in Mainland China.中国大陆老年临终居家临终关怀需求问卷(HHCNQ-DE)的编制与验证
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Dec;41(12):1391-1399. doi: 10.1177/10499091231223486. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
10
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Nurses' Experiences and Perceptions of End-of-Life Care for Cancer Patients in Korea: A Scoping Review.理解韩国护士对癌症患者临终关怀的体验和看法:系统评价。
J Palliat Care. 2021 Oct;36(4):255-264. doi: 10.1177/08258597211027021. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
2
Predictors of compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction among emergency nurses: A cross-sectional survey.急诊护士同情疲劳、职业倦怠和同情满意度的预测因素:一项横断面调查。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 Mar;55:100961. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100961. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
3
Mindful Self-Care and Secondary Traumatic Stress Mediate a Relationship Between Compassion Satisfaction and Burnout Risk Among Hospice Care Professionals.正念自我关怀与继发性创伤压力在临终关怀专业人员的同情满足感与职业倦怠风险之间起中介作用。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Aug;35(8):1099-1108. doi: 10.1177/1049909118756657. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
4
The Emotional Labor of Personal Grief in Palliative Care: Balancing Caring and Professional Identities.在姑息治疗中个人悲痛的情感劳动:平衡关怀和专业身份。
Qual Health Res. 2017 Dec;27(14):2211-2221. doi: 10.1177/1049732317729139. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
5
Professional compassion fatigue: what is the true cost of nurses caring for the dying?职业同情疲劳:护士照料临终患者的真正代价是什么?
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2012 Dec;18(12):606-11. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.12.606.
6
Burnout and connectedness in the job demands-resources model: studying palliative care volunteers and their families.工作要求-资源模型中的职业倦怠与联系感:对姑息治疗志愿者及其家人的研究
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012 Sep;29(6):462-75. doi: 10.1177/1049909111430224. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
7
Nurses' views of the coping and support mechanisms experienced in managing terminal haemorrhage.护士对处理晚期出血时所经历的应对和支持机制的看法。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2011 Jan;17(1):7-13. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2011.17.1.7.
8
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
9
Health of family members caring for elderly persons with dementia. A longitudinal study.照顾老年痴呆症患者的家庭成员的健康状况。一项纵向研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jan 15;120(2):126-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-2-199401150-00005.
10
Effect of New York State's do-not-resuscitate legislation on in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation practice.纽约州“不要复苏”立法对医院内心肺复苏实践的影响。
Am J Med. 1990 Feb;88(2):108-11. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90457-o.