Paterson Alice, Devlin Lynsey, Mitchell Joanne, Ogg Jacqueline, Farnan Kirsty, Coupland Suzanne, Duffton Aileen
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Institute of Cancer Sciences and University of Glasgow, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 Apr 12;30:100248. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100248. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is associated with improved treatment outcomes and survival in cancer patients. Engagement from therapeutic radiographers/radiation therapists (RTTs) in research, has been identified as a challenge. The aim of this survey was to gain an understanding of RTT attitudes to research in Scotland.
This was a prospective study that used a mixed method cross-sectional survey, with an online survey tool (Webropol). The survey was developed with collaborators from all Scottish Radiotherapy Centres (n = 5) and piloted by 6 conveniently sampled RTT and validated by 8 experienced RTTs. The survey comprised 29 items, 7 selection-based demographic questions, and 18 statements with a Likert 5-point metric scale rating (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree). The validity was measured with the content validity index (CVI) and item-CVI by 8 experienced RTTs. Low scoring I-CVI (<0.78) questions were removed.A total of 314 RTTs working in Scottish Radiotherapy Centres were invited to participate. Approvals were given by each Head of department (HoD), who also confirmed number of RTTs.
A total of 102/314 (32.5 %) RTTs responded. The majority of RTTs agreed they were confident they had sufficient research skills to inform EBP (n = 58/102, 56.9 %), felt confident discussing EBP with colleagues (n = 67, 65.7 %) and felt research was important for role development (n = 89, 87.2 %). Low mean scores and standard deviation (SD) were observed for the following: "I know how to get involved in research" 3.2 (1.2), "I have been given the opportunity to get involved in research" 3.2 (1.1), and "I am well informed about current research projects in my department" 3.2 (1.1). 57.8 % (n = 59) of RTTs disagreed they were confident adequate time would be provided to be involved in research.
The survey results demonstrated a predominantly positive attitude to research amongst RTTs working in Scottish centres, with most common perceived barriers being access to protected time and staff; training, and support.
循证实践(EBP)与癌症患者改善的治疗结果及生存率相关。治疗放射技师/放射治疗师(RTT)参与研究已被视为一项挑战。本次调查的目的是了解苏格兰RTT对研究的态度。
这是一项前瞻性研究,采用混合方法横断面调查,使用在线调查工具(Webropol)。该调查由所有苏格兰放疗中心(n = 5)的合作者共同制定,由6名方便抽样的RTT进行预试验,并由8名经验丰富的RTT进行验证。该调查包括29个项目、7个基于选择的人口统计学问题以及18条采用李克特5级量表评分的陈述(1 = 强烈不同意,2 = 不同意,3 = 中立,4 = 同意,5 = 强烈同意)。8名经验丰富的RTT使用内容效度指数(CVI)和项目CVI来衡量效度。对得分较低的项目CVI(<0. (0.78))问题进行了删除。共邀请了314名在苏格兰放疗中心工作的RTT参与。每个部门负责人(HoD)均给予批准,其还确认了RTT的数量。
共有102/314(32.5%)名RTT做出回应。大多数RTT同意他们有信心具备足够的研究技能以支持循证实践(n = 58/102,56.9%),有信心与同事讨论循证实践(n = 67,65.7%),并认为研究对职业发展很重要(n = 89,87.2%)。以下各项的平均得分和标准差(SD)较低:“我知道如何参与研究”3.2(1.2),“我有机会参与研究”3.2(1.1),以及“我充分了解我所在部门当前的研究项目”3.2(1.1)。57.8%(n = 59)的RTT不同意他们有信心会有足够的时间参与研究。
调查结果表明,在苏格兰中心工作的RTT对研究总体持积极态度,最常见的感知障碍是获得受保护的时间和人员;培训以及支持。