Gromkowski S H, Krensky A M, Martz E, Burakoff S J
J Immunol. 1985 Jan;134(1):244-9.
We asked whether we could distinguish the roles of the human lymphocyte membrane proteins LFA-1, LFA-2, and LFA-3 in the function of CTL-mediated killing. Little is known about the functions of these molecularly distinct proteins beyond the facts that i) binding of a monoclonal antibody (MAb) to any one of them is sufficient to inhibit killing, ii) that in each case inhibition involves prevention of CTL-target cell conjugate formation, and iii) that MAb to LFA-1 and LFA-2 inhibit best when bound to the CTL, whereas anti-LFA-3 inhibits only when bound to the target cell. This latter is despite the fact that (in our test system) LFA-1 and LFA-3 are expressed both on the CTL and on the target. When the target cells were pretreated with trypsin, the sensitivity of CTL-mediated killing was affected in a different way for each site. Inhibition of anti-LFA-1 was increased by approximately 20-fold. Inhibition by anti-LFA-2 was unaffected. Inhibition by anti-LFA-3 was abolished. Trypsin did not remove the specific antigens recognized by the various CTL, HLA-A,B,C or HLA-DR. Nor did it remove LFA-1 from the target cell. It did, however, selectively remove LFA-3 from the target cell. These results indicate, for the first time, that LFA-1 and LFA-2 have functionally distinct roles. They suggest that an unidentified trypsin-sensitive target cell molecule, operationally designated the "trypsin-sensitive counter blocker" (TSCB), plays an important role in the function of LFA-1, possibly by providing a target cell binding site for LFA-1 on the CTL. The hypothesis that this TSCB is identical to LFA-3 (and the related possibility that LFA-1 and LFA-3 are mutual ligands) is not favored by our data, but is not excluded. Finally, the data indicate that the mechanisms by which MAb inhibit killing differ at the LFA-1 and LFA-3 sites. They are consistent with LFA-1 providing adhesion strengthening by binding to another site (the TSCB?) and with LFA-3 delivering an inhibitory signal when provoked with MAb.
我们探讨了是否能够区分人类淋巴细胞膜蛋白淋巴细胞功能相关抗原-1(LFA-1)、淋巴细胞功能相关抗原-2(LFA-2)和淋巴细胞功能相关抗原-3(LFA-3)在细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL)介导杀伤功能中的作用。除了以下这些事实外,对于这些分子结构不同的蛋白质的功能了解甚少:i)单克隆抗体(MAb)与其中任何一种蛋白结合都足以抑制杀伤作用;ii)在每种情况下,抑制作用都涉及阻止CTL与靶细胞形成共轭体;iii)与LFA-1和LFA-2结合的MAb在与CTL结合时抑制效果最佳,而抗LFA-3仅在与靶细胞结合时才有抑制作用。尽管(在我们的测试系统中)LFA-1和LFA-3在CTL和靶细胞上均有表达,但仍出现了后一种情况。当用胰蛋白酶预处理靶细胞时,CTL介导杀伤的敏感性对每个位点的影响方式不同。抗LFA-1的抑制作用增加了约20倍。抗LFA-2的抑制作用未受影响。抗LFA-3的抑制作用则被消除。胰蛋白酶并未去除各种CTL所识别的特异性抗原,即人类白细胞抗原A、B、C(HLA-A、B、C)或人类白细胞抗原DR(HLA-DR)。它也没有从靶细胞上去除LFA-1。然而,它确实选择性地从靶细胞上去除了LFA-3。这些结果首次表明,LFA-1和LFA-2具有功能上不同的作用。它们表明,一种尚未确定的对胰蛋白酶敏感的靶细胞分子,暂定为“胰蛋白酶敏感的反阻断剂”(TSCB),在LFA-1的功能中起重要作用,可能是通过为CTL上的LFA-1提供一个靶细胞结合位点。我们的数据不支持TSCB与LFA-3相同这一假设(以及LFA-1和LFA-3是相互配体的相关可能性),但也未排除。最后,数据表明MAb抑制杀伤作用的机制在LFA-1和LFA-3位点有所不同。它们与LFA-1通过与另一个位点(TSCB?)结合来增强黏附作用以及LFA-3在受到MAb刺激时传递抑制信号的情况相符。