Gromkowski S H, Heagy W, Martz E
J Immunol. 1985 Jan;134(1):70-7.
We sought additional evidence for an inverse relationship between functional CTL-target cell affinity on the one hand, and susceptibility of the CTL-mediated killing to inhibition by alpha LFA-1 and alpha Lyt-2,3 monoclonal antibodies on the other hand. Previously, we experimentally reduced affinity by pretreating the target cells with papain. This removed most of the class I H-2 antigens, had little effect on the ability of allospecific CTL to recognize and kill these targets, but dramatically reduced the initial strength of CTL-target cell adhesion, and increased by more than 10-fold the susceptibility of the killing to inhibition by alpha Lyt-2,3 and alpha LFA-1 MAb. In the present report, we find that pretreating the target cells with trypsin, like papain, does not significantly change the susceptibility of the target cells to killing by allospecific CTL in a 2-hr assay, and increases by about 10-fold susceptibility of the killing to inhibition by alpha LFA-1. Unlike papain, however, trypsin does not consistently increase blocking by alpha Lyt-2,3, does not remove class I H-2 antigens from the target cell, and does not substantially reduce the strength of initial CTL-target adhesion formation (estimated by post dispersion lysis after a 5-min conjugate-forming incubation). These results show a functional difference between LFA-1 and Lyt-2,3. Both papain and trypsin produced similar 10-fold increases in susceptibility to blocking by alpha LFA-1. In contrast, susceptibility to inhibition by alpha Lyt-2,3 was increased nearly 100-fold by papain, but was not consistently affected by trypsin. Thus, the above-mentioned inverse relationship holds for alpha Lyt-2,3 but not for alpha LFA-1. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that Lyt-2,3 but not LFA-1 participates in recognition of class I H-2 antigens. Possibly LFA-1 participates in an adhesion-strengthening process that follows T cell recognition, and which may also be used by other LFA-1 expressing leucocytes in intercellular interactions. Finally, our results suggest (for the first time in the mouse system) that an unidentified non-H-2 "trypsin-sensitive counter blocking" molecule on the target cell plays an important role in CTL-target cell interaction.
我们一方面寻找功能性CTL-靶细胞亲和力与另一方面CTL介导的杀伤对αLFA-1和αLyt-2,3单克隆抗体抑制作用的敏感性之间呈负相关的更多证据。此前,我们通过用木瓜蛋白酶预处理靶细胞来实验性地降低亲和力。这去除了大部分I类H-2抗原,对同种特异性CTL识别和杀伤这些靶细胞的能力影响很小,但显著降低了CTL-靶细胞黏附的初始强度,并使杀伤对αLyt-2,3和αLFA-1单克隆抗体抑制作用的敏感性增加了10倍以上。在本报告中,我们发现用胰蛋白酶预处理靶细胞,与木瓜蛋白酶一样,在2小时的实验中不会显著改变靶细胞对同种特异性CTL杀伤的敏感性,并且使杀伤对αLFA-1抑制作用的敏感性增加约10倍。然而,与木瓜蛋白酶不同的是,胰蛋白酶不会持续增加αLyt-2,3的阻断作用,不会从靶细胞上去除I类H-2抗原,也不会大幅降低初始CTL-靶细胞黏附形成的强度(通过5分钟共轭形成孵育后的分散后裂解来估计)。这些结果显示了LFA-1和Lyt-2,3之间的功能差异。木瓜蛋白酶和胰蛋白酶都使对αLFA-1阻断作用的敏感性增加了类似的10倍。相比之下,木瓜蛋白酶使对αLyt-2,3抑制作用的敏感性增加了近100倍,但胰蛋白酶对其没有持续影响。因此,上述负相关关系对αLyt-2,3成立,但对αLFA-1不成立。我们的结果与Lyt-2,3而非LFA-1参与I类H-2抗原识别的假设一致。可能LFA-1参与了T细胞识别后的黏附增强过程,并且其他表达LFA-1的白细胞在细胞间相互作用中也可能利用这一过程。最后,我们的结果表明(在小鼠系统中首次表明)靶细胞上一种未鉴定的非H-2“胰蛋白酶敏感的反阻断”分子在CTL-靶细胞相互作用中起重要作用。