• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家卫生研究院种族平等框架:开发一种用于在公众参与中解决种族平等问题的工具。

NIHR Race Equality Framework: development of a tool for addressing racial equality in public involvement.

作者信息

Faluyi David, Ovseiko Pavel V, Dziedzic Krysia, Scott Fay

机构信息

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.

Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2024 May 7;10(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00569-z.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-024-00569-z
PMID:38715152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11077722/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While there has been a long recognition of the importance of race equality in health and care research, there is a lack of sustained action among research funding and research performing organisations to address racial equality in public involvement. This paper describes how the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) convened a Race Equality Public Action Group (REPAG), which co-developed with public contributors and stakeholders a Race Equality Framework - a tool for addressing racial equality in public involvement.

METHODS

The REPAG, through meetings and discussions, defined the focus of the Framework, and developed an initial draft of the Framework. Public contributors identified the need for broader consultation with other public members. Three community consultation events with a total of 59 members of Black African-, Asian- and Caribbean-heritage communities were held to seek their views on health and care research generally and on the draft Framework specifically. The draft Framework was modified and piloted among 16 organisations delivering health and care research. Following feedback from the pilot, the Framework was modified and prepared for publication.

RESULTS

The Framework is designed as a self-assessment tool comprised of 50 questions pertaining to five domains of organisational activity: 1) individual responsibility, 2) leadership, 3) public partnerships, 4) recruitment, and 5) systems and processes. The questions were co-designed with REPAG public members and provide key concepts and elements of good practice that organisations should consider and address on their path to achieving racial competence. The accompanying materials provide implementation guidance with 20 detailed steps, case studies of actions taken in seven pilot organisations, and links to additional resources. The pilot demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a meaningful self-assessment over a period of three months and the usefulness of the results for developing longer-term action plans.

CONCLUSION

The Framework represents the first self-assessment tool for addressing racial equality in public involvement. Co-design with REPAG public members enhanced its authenticity and practicality. Organisations in the field of health and care research and any other organisations that use partnerships with the public are encouraged to adopt the Framework.

摘要

背景

尽管人们早就认识到种族平等在健康与护理研究中的重要性,但研究资助机构和研究执行组织在解决公众参与方面的种族平等问题上缺乏持续行动。本文描述了英国国家卫生与保健研究机构(NIHR)如何召集了一个种族平等公共行动小组(REPAG),该小组与公众贡献者和利益相关者共同制定了一个种族平等框架——一种用于解决公众参与方面种族平等问题的工具。

方法

REPAG通过会议和讨论确定了该框架的重点,并制定了框架初稿。公众贡献者指出需要与其他公众成员进行更广泛的协商。举办了三次社区协商活动,共有59名来自非洲裔、亚裔和加勒比裔社区的成员参加,以征求他们对一般健康与护理研究以及该框架草案的意见。该框架草案在16个开展健康与护理研究的组织中进行了修改和试点。根据试点反馈,对框架进行了修改并准备发布。

结果

该框架被设计为一种自我评估工具,由50个与组织活动的五个领域相关的问题组成:1)个人责任,2)领导力,3)公共伙伴关系,4)招募,5)系统与流程。这些问题是与REPAG的公众成员共同设计的,提供了良好实践的关键概念和要素,组织在实现种族能力的道路上应予以考虑和解决。随附材料提供了20个详细步骤的实施指南、七个试点组织采取行动的案例研究以及其他资源链接。试点证明了在三个月内进行有意义的自我评估的可行性以及结果对制定长期行动计划的有用性。

结论

该框架是首个用于解决公众参与方面种族平等问题的自我评估工具。与REPAG公众成员的共同设计增强了其真实性和实用性。鼓励健康与护理研究领域的组织以及任何其他与公众建立伙伴关系的组织采用该框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a908/11077722/6ac48cf66dac/40900_2024_569_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a908/11077722/6ac48cf66dac/40900_2024_569_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a908/11077722/6ac48cf66dac/40900_2024_569_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
NIHR Race Equality Framework: development of a tool for addressing racial equality in public involvement.国家卫生研究院种族平等框架:开发一种用于在公众参与中解决种族平等问题的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 May 7;10(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00569-z.
2
A framework for more equitable, diverse, and inclusive Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research.一个用于姑息治疗研究的更公平、多元和包容的患者及公众参与框架。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 8;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00525-3.
3
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
4
Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands: creating, delivering and evaluating the lay assessor training programme.与东米德兰兹地区的公众和研究组织成员共同开展公众参与培训:创建、实施和评估外行人评估员培训计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 5;3:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0056-0. eCollection 2017.
5
Regional working in the East of England: using the UK National Standards for Public Involvement.英格兰东部的区域工作:采用英国公众参与国家标准。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 6;4:48. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0130-2. eCollection 2018.
6
Co-producing an online patient public community research hub: a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of national institute for health research (NIHR) research champions in England.共同创建一个在线患者公共社区研究中心:一项探索英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)研究倡导者观点的定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 16;10(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00556-4.
7
"We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust" …. Involving and engaging 'seldom listened to' community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach.“我们并非难以接触,但我们可能发现难以信任”……让“很少被倾听”的社区声音参与到临床转化健康研究中:一种社会创新方法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 26;7(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z.
8
Inclusive approaches to involvement of community groups in health research: the co-produced CHICO guidance.让社区团体参与健康研究的包容性方法:共同制定的CHICO指南。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Sep 7;9(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00492-9.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
'The Listening Series': increasing equity, diversity and inclusion in patient and public involvement and engagement for policy research by listening to and learning from under-represented groups.“倾听系列”:通过倾听代表性不足群体的意见并向他们学习,在患者和公众参与政策研究方面增强公平性、多样性和包容性。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jul 4;10(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00601-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the Scope, Intent and Extent of Published Conceptual Frameworks of Frameworks for Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research: A Rapid Scoping Review.理解患者及公众参与健康和社会护理研究的框架的已发表概念框架的范围、意图和程度:一项快速范围综述
Health Expect. 2025 Oct;28(5):e70425. doi: 10.1111/hex.70425.
2
Distinguishing participants, patients and the public: implications of different institutional settings on engagement approaches.区分参与者、患者和公众:不同机构环境对参与方式的影响。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 15;11(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00732-0.
3
Peer researchers in NHS research: approved in principle, undermined in practice?

本文引用的文献

1
Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study.优化实践社区中的知识传播过程:一项(多方法)定性研究的建议
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jan 26;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00384-1.
2
Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials.评估一种用于提高服务不足群体参与试验的参与度和招募率的工具。
Trials. 2022 Oct 9;23(1):867. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2.
3
Tackling racism in UK health research.解决英国健康研究中的种族主义问题。
英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)研究中的同行研究者:原则上获批,实践中却受到破坏?
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00708-0.
4
Building trust and inclusion with under-served groups: a public involvement project employing a knowledge mobilisation approach.与服务不足群体建立信任与包容:一个采用知识传播方法的公众参与项目。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Nov 11;10(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00647-2.
BMJ. 2022 Jan 18;376:e065574. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-065574.
4
Developing a toolkit for increasing the participation of black, Asian and minority ethnic communities in health and social care research.开发一个工具包,以增加黑人和少数族裔社区参与健康和社会关怀研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01489-2.
5
Developing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework-a tool to help trialists design trials that better reflect the communities they serve.制定 INCLUDE 种族框架——一种帮助试验设计者设计更好地反映他们所服务社区的试验的工具。
Trials. 2021 May 10;22(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05276-8.
6
Racial and ethnic health disparities in healthcare settings.医疗环境中的种族和民族健康差异。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 8;372:n605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n605.
7
Patient and public involvement for ethnic minority research: an urgent need for improvement.少数民族研究中的患者和公众参与:亟待改进。
J R Soc Med. 2021 Jul;114(7):347-350. doi: 10.1177/0141076821994274. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
Assessment of the Inclusion of Racial/Ethnic Minority, Female, and Older Individuals in Vaccine Clinical Trials.评估种族/少数民族、女性和老年人在疫苗临床试验中的纳入情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037640. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37640.
9
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19-Related Infections, Hospitalizations, and Deaths : A Systematic Review.COVID-19 相关感染、住院和死亡的种族和民族差异:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Mar;174(3):362-373. doi: 10.7326/M20-6306. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
10
Effect of Athena SWAN funding incentives on women's research leadership.雅典娜天鹅奖资助激励措施对女性研究领导力的影响。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 26;371:m3975. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3975.