Shannahan M D, Cottrell B H
Nurs Res. 1985 Mar-Apr;34(2):89-92.
The effect of delivering in a birth chair on duration of second stage labor, fetal outcome, and maternal blood loss was examined in a retrospective study. The sample consisted of 60 primiparous women, 37 to 41 weeks gestation with a normal pregnancy and labor, 30 delivering on a traditional delivery table and 30 delivering in a birth chair. Comparisons were made between groups for mean duration of second stage labor, mean Apgar scores at one and five minutes, and mean maternal hemoglobin and hematocrit values during the pre- and post-partum periods. No significant difference was found between delivery table and birth chair groups for mean duration of second stage labor (birth chair, X = 60 minutes versus delivery table, X = 43 minutes, t = 1.66, p = .10). Mean Apgar scores at one and five minutes were nearly identical. Statistically significant differences existed between groups in mean maternal hemoglobin and hematocrit values. Both the mean hemoglobin and the mean hematocrit upon admission were significantly higher in the birth chair group (p less than .027). However, postpartally the birth chair group had significantly lower mean hemoglobin and hematocrit values (p less than .025). These findings suggest that the birth chair, as an alternate delivery method, is safe in terms of fetal outcome but presents no advantage to the mother in terms of shorter second stage labor. Further investigation of maternal blood loss is recommended to rule out possible untoward effects.
一项回顾性研究考察了在分娩椅上分娩对第二产程时长、胎儿结局及产妇失血量的影响。样本包括60名初产妇,孕周为37至41周,妊娠及分娩情况正常,其中30名在传统产床上分娩,30名在分娩椅上分娩。对两组第二产程的平均时长、1分钟和5分钟时的平均阿氏评分以及产前和产后期间产妇血红蛋白和血细胞比容的平均值进行了比较。在第二产程的平均时长方面,分娩椅组和产床组之间未发现显著差异(分娩椅组,X = 60分钟;产床组,X = 43分钟,t = 1.66,p = 0.10)。1分钟和5分钟时的平均阿氏评分几乎相同。两组产妇血红蛋白和血细胞比容的平均值存在统计学上的显著差异。分娩椅组入院时的平均血红蛋白和平均血细胞比容均显著更高(p < 0.027)。然而,产后分娩椅组的平均血红蛋白和血细胞比容值显著更低(p < 0.025)。这些发现表明,作为一种替代分娩方式,分娩椅在胎儿结局方面是安全的,但在缩短第二产程方面对母亲并无优势。建议对产妇失血量进行进一步研究,以排除可能的不良影响。