Suppr超能文献

分娩时推挤技术对母亲和胎儿的影响:一项随机研究。

Effects of pushing techniques in birth on mother and fetus: a randomized study.

作者信息

Yildirim Gulay, Beji Nezihe Kizilkaya

机构信息

Florence Nightingale School of Nursing, Department of Obstetric and Gynecologic Nursing, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Birth. 2008 Mar;35(1):25-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00208.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Valsalva pushing technique is used routinely in the second stage of labor in many countries, and it is accepted as standard obstetric management in Turkey. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of pushing techniques on mother and fetus in birth in this setting.

METHODS

This randomized study was conducted between July 2003 and June 2004 in Bakirkoy Maternity and Children's Teaching Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. One hundred low-risk primiparas between 38 and 42 weeks' gestation, who expected a spontaneous vaginal delivery, were randomized to either a spontaneous pushing group or a Valsalva-type pushing group. Spontaneous pushing women were informed during the first stage of labor about spontaneous pushing technique (open glottis pushing while breathing out) and were supported in pushing spontaneously in the second stage of labor. Similarly, Valsalva pushing women were informed during the first stage of labor about the Valsalva pushing technique (closed glottis pushing while holding their breath) and were supported in using Valsalva pushing in the second stage of labor. Perineal tears, postpartum hemorrhage, and hemoglobin levels were evaluated in mothers; and umbilical artery pH, Po(2) (mmHg), and Pco(2) (mmHg) levels and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were evaluated in newborns in both groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the two groups in their demographics, incidence of nonreassuring fetal surveillance patterns, or use of oxytocin. The second stage of labor and duration of the expulsion phase were significantly longer with Valsalva-type pushing. Differences in the incidence of episiotomy, perineal tears, or postpartum hemorrhage were not significant between the groups. The baby fared better with spontaneous pushing, with higher 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores, and higher umbilical cord pH and Po(2) levels. After the birth, women expressed greater satisfaction with spontaneous pushing.

CONCLUSIONS

Educating women about the spontaneous pushing technique in the first stage of labor and providing support for spontaneous pushing in the second stage result in a shorter second stage without interventions and in improved newborn outcomes. Women also stated that they pushed more effectively with the spontaneous pushing technique.

摘要

背景

瓦尔萨尔瓦屏气用力法在许多国家的分娩第二产程中常规使用,在土耳其它被视为标准的产科处理方法。本研究的目的是确定在这种情况下用力方法对母亲和胎儿分娩的影响。

方法

本随机研究于2003年7月至2004年6月在土耳其伊斯坦布尔的巴克尔柯伊妇产儿童医院进行。100名妊娠38至42周、预计自然阴道分娩的低风险初产妇被随机分为自然用力组或瓦尔萨尔瓦式用力组。自然用力组的产妇在第一产程中被告知自然用力方法(呼气时声门开放用力),并在第二产程中得到自然用力的支持。同样,瓦尔萨尔瓦用力组的产妇在第一产程中被告知瓦尔萨尔瓦用力方法(屏气时声门关闭用力),并在第二产程中得到使用瓦尔萨尔瓦用力的支持。评估两组母亲的会阴撕裂、产后出血和血红蛋白水平;评估两组新生儿的脐动脉pH值、氧分压(mmHg)、二氧化碳分压(mmHg)水平以及1分钟和5分钟时的阿氏评分。

结果

两组在人口统计学、胎儿监护异常模式发生率或缩宫素使用方面无显著差异。瓦尔萨尔瓦式用力时第二产程和娩出期持续时间显著更长。两组之间会阴切开术、会阴撕裂或产后出血发生率的差异不显著。自然用力时新生儿情况更好,1分钟和5分钟阿氏评分更高,脐动脉pH值和氧分压水平更高。分娩后,产妇对自然用力的满意度更高。

结论

在第一产程中对产妇进行自然用力方法的教育,并在第二产程中为自然用力提供支持,可使第二产程在无干预情况下更短,并改善新生儿结局。产妇还表示,使用自然用力方法时她们用力更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验