Suppr超能文献

分娩椅上自然阴道分娩与传统仰卧位自然阴道分娩的匹配对照比较。

Spontaneous vaginal delivery in the birth-chair versus in the conventional dorsal position: a matched controlled comparison.

作者信息

Scholz H S, Benedicic C, Arikan M G, Haas J, Petru E

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001 Sep 17;113(17-18):695-7.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of a birth-chair on obstetric outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the hospital records of 220 consecutive pregnant women who gave birth on a birth-chair at our institution. The control group consisted of 440 pregnant women who preceded and followed the index cases and who had spontaneous vaginal deliveries in the conventional dorsal supine position. The controls were matched for parity and for the attending mid-wife.

RESULTS

Patients who delivered in the birth-chair had significantly lower rates of episiotomy and manual separation of the placenta. The umbilical blood cord pH was significantly higher in neonates of the birth-chair group. The duration of labour, rate of perineal and vaginal injury, Apgar scores and rate of admission to a neonatal intermediate care unit were not influenced by the mode of delivery.

CONCLUSION

Our data support previous studies that a birth-chair delivery may be a safe alternative to conventional delivery in the supine position.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估分娩椅对产科结局的影响。

患者与方法

我们回顾了在我院使用分娩椅分娩的220例连续孕妇的医院记录。对照组由440例在索引病例之前和之后分娩、并采用传统仰卧位自然阴道分娩的孕妇组成。对照组在胎次和接生助产士方面进行了匹配。

结果

使用分娩椅分娩的患者会阴切开术和人工剥离胎盘的发生率显著较低。分娩椅组新生儿的脐血pH值显著较高。分娩方式对产程、会阴及阴道损伤发生率、阿氏评分及新生儿中级护理病房收治率无影响。

结论

我们的数据支持先前的研究,即分娩椅分娩可能是仰卧位传统分娩的一种安全替代方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验