Suppr超能文献

身份识别错误:猫栉首蚤(猫蚤)血巴尔通体属感染的系统评价、荟萃分析和再调查。

A case of mistaken identity: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and reinvestigation of hemotropic Mycoplasma spp. infection in Ctenocephalides felis (cat flea).

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Parasit Vectors. 2024 May 9;17(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06292-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Feline-associated hemotropic Mycoplasma (hemoplasmas) are believed to be transmitted by two primary mechanisms: (1) direct transmission via fighting and (2) vector-borne transmission by the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis). While the efficiency of transmission by C. felis appears low, most manuscripts focus on the prevalence of hemoplasmas in wild-caught fleas and report either a very low (< 3%) or a high (> 26%) prevalence. Therefore, we aimed to assess the influence of sample processing and PCR methods on C. felis hemoplasma infection prevalence.

METHODS

A systemic review of PubMed articles identified 13 manuscripts (1,531 fleas/flea pools) that met the inclusion criteria (performed PCR for >1 hemoplasma on C. felis collected from cats). Risk of bias was assessed utilizing the ROBINS-E tool. Meta-analysis performed in R of these manuscripts found that not washing samples and a common set of 16S rRNA primers first published in Jensen et al. 2001 were associated with increased hemoplasma prevalence. To evaluate the influence of washing on newly collected fleas, we assessed the hemoplasma status of 20 pools of 5 C. felis each, half of which were washed and half not washed.

RESULTS

Flea washing did not influence the detection of hemoplasma but instead amplified Spiroplasma. To assess non-specific amplification with the Jensen et al. 2001 primers, 67 C. felis samples (34% previously reported hemoplasma infected) were subject to PCR and sequencing. By this method, hemoplasma was detected in only 3% of samples. In the remaining "hemoplasma infected" fleas, PCR amplified Spiroplasma or other bacteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, we concluded that hemoplasma infection in C. felis is rare, and future flea prevalence studies should sequence all positive amplicons to validate PCR specificity. Further investigation of alternative methods of feline-associated hemoplasma transmission and the ability of C. felis to maintain hemoplasma infection is necessary.

摘要

背景

猫相关的血支原体(hemoplasmas)被认为通过两种主要机制传播:(1)通过战斗直接传播,(2)通过猫蚤(Ctenocephalides felis)传播。虽然 C. felis 的传播效率似乎较低,但大多数文献都集中在野生跳蚤中血支原体的流行情况,并报告了非常低(<3%)或高(>26%)的流行率。因此,我们旨在评估样品处理和 PCR 方法对 C. felis 血支原体感染流行率的影响。

方法

通过对 PubMed 文章进行系统综述,确定了 13 篇符合纳入标准的文献(对从猫身上收集的 C. felis 进行了>1 种血支原体的 PCR)。利用 ROBINS-E 工具评估偏倚风险。对这些文献进行的 R 中的荟萃分析发现,不清洗样品和使用 Jensen 等人于 2001 年首次发表的通用 16S rRNA 引物与增加血支原体流行率有关。为了评估清洗对新收集的跳蚤的影响,我们评估了 20 组每组 5 个 C. felis 的血支原体状态,其中一半进行了清洗,另一半未进行清洗。

结果

跳蚤清洗不会影响血支原体的检测,但会扩增螺旋体。为了评估 Jensen 等人 2001 年引物的非特异性扩增,对 67 个 C. felis 样本(34%先前报告的血支原体感染)进行了 PCR 和测序。通过这种方法,仅在 3%的样本中检测到血支原体。在其余的“血支原体感染”跳蚤中,PCR 扩增了螺旋体或其他细菌。

结论

因此,我们得出结论,C. felis 中的血支原体感染很少见,未来的跳蚤流行率研究应测序所有阳性扩增子以验证 PCR 特异性。需要进一步研究替代的猫相关血支原体传播方法以及 C. felis 维持血支原体感染的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/955c/11080109/5eec844a0980/13071_2024_6292_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验