Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Department of Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Mil Med. 2024 Aug 30;189(9-10):e2220-e2228. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae167.
Past research has examined civilian and military medical schools' preparation of physicians for their first deployment. Most recently, our research team conducted a large-scale survey comparing physicians' perceptions of their readiness for their first deployment. Our results revealed that military medical school graduates felt significantly more prepared for deployment by medical school than civilian medical school graduates. In order to further investigate these results and deepen our understanding of the two pathways' preparation of military physicians, this study analyzed the open-ended responses in the survey using a qualitative research design.
We used a descriptive phenomenological design to analyze 451 participants' open-ended responses on the survey. After becoming familiar with the data, we coded the participants' responses for meaningful statements. We organized these codes into major categories, which became the themes of our study. Finally, we labeled each of these themes to reflect the participants' perceptions of how medical school prepared them for deployment.
Four themes emerged from our data analysis: (1) Civilian medical school equipped graduates with soft skills and medical knowledge for their first deployment; (2) Civilian medical school may not have adequately prepared graduates to practice medicine in an austere environment to include the officership challenges of deployment; (3) Military medical school prepared graduates to navigate the medical practice and operational aspects of their first deployment; and (4) Military medical school may not have adequately prepared graduates for the realism of their first deployment.
Our study provided insight into the strengths and areas for growth in each medical school pathway for military medical officers. These results may be used to enhance military medical training regardless of accession pathway and increase the readiness of military physicians for future large-scale conflicts.
过去的研究考察了民用和军事医学院校为医生首次部署所做的准备。最近,我们的研究团队进行了一项大规模调查,比较了医生对首次部署准备情况的看法。我们的研究结果表明,军医毕业生比民用医学院校毕业生更能感受到军医毕业生在医学院的准备程度。为了进一步研究这些结果,深入了解这两种途径对军事医生的准备情况,本研究使用定性研究设计对调查中的开放式回答进行了分析。
我们使用描述性现象学设计对调查中的 451 名参与者的开放式回答进行了分析。在熟悉数据后,我们对参与者的回答进行了有意义的陈述编码。我们将这些代码组织成主要类别,成为我们研究的主题。最后,我们给每个主题贴上标签,以反映参与者对医学院如何为他们的部署做准备的看法。
从我们的数据分析中出现了四个主题:(1)民用医学院为毕业生的首次部署配备了软技能和医学知识;(2)民用医学院可能没有充分准备毕业生在艰苦环境中行医,包括部署的军官挑战;(3)军事医学院为毕业生在首次部署的医疗实践和运营方面做好了准备;(4)军事医学院可能没有充分为毕业生的首次部署的现实情况做好准备。
我们的研究深入了解了军事医学院校军事医生的优势和增长领域。这些结果可用于加强军事医疗培训,无论入伍途径如何,并提高军事医生对未来大规模冲突的准备程度。