• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲状腺瘢痕评估方法的趋势与现状分析

Analysis of trends and status of evaluation methods in thyroid scar.

作者信息

Choi Woo Kyoung, Shin Hui Young, Park Yu Jeong, Lee Seung Ho, Lee Ai-Young, Hong Jong Soo

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Goyang, South Korea.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(9):e29301. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29301. eCollection 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29301
PMID:38720695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11076647/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of thyroid cancer has increased over the decades, and patients prefer short thin scars after thyroidectomy due to their cosmetic visibility. Several scar assessment methods have been used to determine the most cosmetically optimal surgical method, but a widely accepted measurement tool is still lacking. This study investigates the usage status in the thyroid scar scale according to time, region, and study method.

METHODS

The authors searched for articles on thyroid scars published between January 2000 and September 2022 in the PubMed database. The study included clinical studies that mentioned thyroid scar and scar scale, excluding articles that did not evaluate neck scars. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies were included. Among them, 17 used the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), 17 used the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), four used the Manchester Scar Scale (MSS), and four used the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). VSS and POSAS were the most commonly used scar evaluation methods. VSS tended to be used frequently in Asia, while POSAS was used frequently in Europe and in randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSION

VSS and POSAS are popular thyroid scar assessment methods, with regional variations. Standardization is needed for meaningful comparisons. Patient's subjective evaluations should be considered, given the cosmetic importance of thyroid scars.

摘要

背景

几十年来甲状腺癌的发病率有所上升,由于美观性,甲状腺切除术后患者更喜欢短而细的疤痕。已经使用了几种疤痕评估方法来确定最具美容效果的手术方法,但仍缺乏一种被广泛接受的测量工具。本研究根据时间、地区和研究方法调查了甲状腺疤痕量表的使用情况。

方法

作者在PubMed数据库中检索了2000年1月至2022年9月期间发表的关于甲状腺疤痕的文章。该研究包括提及甲状腺疤痕和疤痕量表的临床研究,排除未评估颈部疤痕的文章。使用IBM SPSS Statistics 29进行统计分析。

结果

共纳入35项研究。其中,17项使用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS),17项使用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS),4项使用曼彻斯特疤痕量表(MSS),4项使用石溪疤痕评估量表(SBSES)。VSS和POSAS是最常用的疤痕评估方法。VSS在亚洲使用频率较高,而POSAS在欧洲和随机对照试验中使用频率较高。

结论

VSS和POSAS是常用的甲状腺疤痕评估方法,存在地区差异。为了进行有意义的比较,需要标准化。考虑到甲状腺疤痕的美容重要性,应考虑患者的主观评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b5a/11076647/b499d908d814/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b5a/11076647/b499d908d814/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b5a/11076647/b499d908d814/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of trends and status of evaluation methods in thyroid scar.甲状腺瘢痕评估方法的趋势与现状分析
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(9):e29301. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29301. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.如何评估手术后疤痕:结局测量指标的综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(25):2055-63. doi: 10.3109/09638280902874196.
3
Analysis of frequency of use of different scar assessment scales based on the scar condition and treatment method.基于瘢痕状况和治疗方法对不同瘢痕评估量表使用频率的分析。
Arch Plast Surg. 2014 Mar;41(2):111-5. doi: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.111. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
4
Pressure-garment therapy for preventing hypertrophic scarring after burn injury.压力衣治疗烧伤后预防增生性瘢痕。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD013530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013530.pub2.
5
Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.使用EASY-EYE_C评估传统甲状腺切除术后的美容效果:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017 Nov;93(5):231-239. doi: 10.4174/astr.2017.93.5.231. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
6
Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Evaluating Linear Scars after Thyroidectomy.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表在评价甲状腺切除术后线性瘢痕中的可靠性。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Jun 1;34(6):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000744344.46898.6e.
7
Fractional CO laser treatment of caesarean section scars-A randomized controlled split-scar trial with long term follow-up assessment.二氧化碳点阵激光治疗剖宫产瘢痕——一项长期随访评估的随机对照半侧瘢痕试验
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Feb;49(2):189-197. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22606. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表评估面部皮肤移植瘢痕的价值。
Ann Dermatol. 2016 Oct;28(5):615-623. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.5.615. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
9
Effect of Botulinum Toxin A on Scar Healing after Thyroidectomy: A Prospective Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.A型肉毒杆菌毒素对甲状腺切除术后瘢痕愈合的影响:一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 21;9(3):868. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030868.
10
Impact of postthyroidectomy scar on the quality of life of thyroid cancer patients.甲状腺切除术后疤痕对甲状腺癌患者生活质量的影响。
Ann Dermatol. 2014 Dec;26(6):693-9. doi: 10.5021/ad.2014.26.6.693. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Subjective scar assessment scales in orthopaedic surgery and determinants of patient satisfaction: A systematic review of the literature.骨科手术中主观瘢痕评估量表及患者满意度的决定因素:文献系统评价。
Chin J Traumatol. 2023 Sep;26(5):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
2
A prospective study to evaluate the treatment effect of pulsed dye laser on thyroidectomy hypertrophic scars using 3D imaging analysis.一项使用 3D 成像分析评估脉冲染料激光治疗甲状腺切除术增生性瘢痕效果的前瞻性研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Oct;54(8):1082-1088. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23584. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
3
Comparison of quality of life and cosmetic result between open and transaxillary endoscopic thyroid lobectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma survivors: A single-center prospective cohort study.
开放式与经腋腔内镜甲状腺叶切除术治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌患者生存质量和美容效果的比较:一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2022 Nov;11(22):4146-4156. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4766. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
The long-term impact of neck scar satisfaction among thyroid surgery patients.甲状腺手术患者颈部瘢痕满意度的长期影响。
Endocr J. 2022 Jul 28;69(7):749-755. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ21-0577. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
5
Energy-Based Devices Affect the Aesthetic Outcome of Cervical Thyroidectomy and Parathyroidectomy. A Retrospective Study.基于能量的设备对颈甲状腺切除术和甲状旁腺切除术的美容效果的影响。一项回顾性研究。
Surg Technol Int. 2021 Nov 8;39:113-119. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.39.GS1499.
6
Effectiveness of a combination therapy using non-ablative fractional laser and intralesional triamcinolone injection for thyroidectomy scar treatment: a prospective, randomized, blinded pilot study.非剥脱性点阵激光联合皮损内曲安奈德注射治疗甲状腺切除术瘢痕的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、盲法的初步研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jul;21(7):2793-2800. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14485. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
7
Long-term cosmetic results of video-assisted thyroidectomy: a comparison with conventional surgery.视频辅助甲状腺切除术的长期美容效果:与传统手术的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Aug;406(5):1625-1633. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02196-8. Epub 2021 May 13.
8
Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Evaluating Linear Scars after Thyroidectomy.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表在评价甲状腺切除术后线性瘢痕中的可靠性。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Jun 1;34(6):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000744344.46898.6e.
9
Current Protocol for Aesthetic Scar Management in Thyroid Surgery.当前甲状腺手术美容性瘢痕管理方案。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):E2188-E2195. doi: 10.1002/lary.29441. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
10
A Prospective Randomized Control Study Comparing the Effects of Dermal Staples and Intradermal Sutures on Postoperative Scarring After Thyroidectomy.一项比较甲状腺切除术后皮钉和皮内缝合对术后瘢痕影响的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:413-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.052. Epub 2020 Aug 10.