Grimaud Logan W, Barquin David L, Kurnot Jeremy A, Adams Eric S, Lentz Aaron C
Department of Urology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Apr 30;13(4):613-621. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-509. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
Since immediate salvage (IS) surgery for infected penile prosthesis (PP) was introduced nearly 30 years ago, an abundance of evidence has emerged in support of its use. IS remains underutilized by the modern urologist despite its distinct advantages. While some medical literature proposes reasons for the underuse of IS, no comprehensive review attempts to address the numerous factors limiting its implementation. Our objective is to analyze the barriers to IS surgery for infected PP with the goal of expanding utilization of this technique through a practical and standardized approach for treating urologists.
A narrative review of available English, peer-reviewed, medical literature relevant to the barriers to IS was completed. Searches were expanded to include literature from surgical specialties in general if hypothesized barriers were incompletely described in available PP publications.
The major barriers that are likely contributing to the low rates of IS for PP surgery can be broadly classified into three major categories: institutional/systemic, medical/surgical, and patient preference. Institutional/systemically driven barriers include surgeon comfort with PP surgery, low national availability of urologists, inaccessibility of prosthetics or critical ancillary staff at the time of patient presentation and limited operating room (OR) access. Medical/surgical barriers primarily relate to reinfection fears, perceived contraindications to IS, and overall patient stability at the time of presentation. Patient preference factors inhibiting IS involve loss of trust in the medical team, psychosocial distress, dissatisfaction with the initial device prior to infection and anxiety regarding postoperative recovery. Many of the identified barriers can be overcome with increased surgical training, improved patient and surgeon understanding of PP infection, or precautionary planning.
Of the factors that contribute to low utilization of IS, many are misunderstood or unknown. Recognition of these barriers may equip urologists to provide better care to patients with prosthesis infection.
自近30年前引入感染性阴茎假体(PP)的即刻挽救(IS)手术以来,已有大量证据支持其应用。尽管IS具有明显优势,但现代泌尿外科医生对其使用仍然不足。虽然一些医学文献提出了IS使用不足的原因,但尚无全面综述试图探讨限制其实施的众多因素。我们的目的是分析感染性PP的IS手术障碍,目标是通过为泌尿外科医生提供一种实用且标准化的治疗方法来扩大该技术的应用。
完成了对与IS障碍相关的可用英文同行评审医学文献的叙述性综述。如果现有PP出版物中对假设的障碍描述不完整,则扩大搜索范围以包括一般外科专业的文献。
可能导致PP手术IS率低的主要障碍可大致分为三大类:机构/系统、医学/手术和患者偏好。机构/系统驱动的障碍包括外科医生对PP手术的熟悉程度、全国泌尿外科医生数量少、患者就诊时无法获得假体或关键辅助人员以及手术室(OR)使用受限。医学/手术障碍主要涉及对再感染的担忧、对IS的感知禁忌以及就诊时患者的整体稳定性。抑制IS的患者偏好因素包括对医疗团队失去信任、心理社会困扰、感染前对初始装置不满意以及对术后恢复的焦虑。通过增加手术培训、提高患者和外科医生对PP感染的理解或预防性规划,可以克服许多已确定的障碍。
在导致IS利用率低的因素中,许多因素被误解或不为人知。认识到这些障碍可能使泌尿外科医生能够为假体感染患者提供更好的护理。