Seibold B Tanner, Ramesh Abhisri, Parel Philip M, Quan Theodore, Ranson Rachel A, Mesfin Addisu, Patel Tushar Ch
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr;15(3):1592-1597. doi: 10.1177/21925682241253154. Epub 2024 May 9.
Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectivesPatients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience distinct physiological challenges that may alter surgical outcomes. There has been no research establishing 10-year lumbar fusion (LF) implant survivorship rates among individuals with SCD. This study aims to determine the 10-year cumulative incidence and indications for revision LF between patients with and without SCD.MethodsA national database was queried to identify patients with and without SCD who underwent primary LF. SCD patients undergoing LF were propensity-score matched in a 1:4 ratio by age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to a matched LF control. In total, 246 SCD patients were included along with 981 and 100,000 individuals in the matched and unmatched control cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized to determine the 10-year cumulative incidence rates of revision LF. Furthermore, multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed to compare indications for revisions and surgical complications between cohorts including hardware removal, drainage and evacuation, pseudoarthrosis, and mechanical failure.ResultsNo significant differences were found in the cumulative incidence of 10-year all-cause revision LF between patients in the SCD cohort and either of the control cohorts ( > .05 for each). Additionally, there were no significant differences between the SCD cohort and either of the control cohorts in regards to the indications for revision or surgical complications in LF ( > .05 for each).ConclusionsThis study indicates that SCD patients do not have increased risk for revision LF, nor any of its indications.
研究设计
回顾性队列研究。
目的
镰状细胞病(SCD)患者面临独特的生理挑战,这可能会改变手术结果。目前尚无研究确定SCD患者10年腰椎融合术(LF)植入物的生存率。本研究旨在确定有和没有SCD的患者之间10年LF翻修的累积发病率及适应证。
方法
查询一个全国性数据库,以识别接受初次LF的有和没有SCD的患者。接受LF的SCD患者按年龄、性别和查尔森合并症指数(CCI)以1:4的比例进行倾向评分匹配,以获得匹配的LF对照组。总共纳入了246例SCD患者,匹配对照组和未匹配对照组分别有981例和100,000例个体。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析来确定LF翻修的10年累积发病率。此外,使用Cox比例风险模型进行多变量分析,以比较各队列之间翻修适应证和手术并发症,包括取出内固定、引流和清创、假关节形成及机械故障。
结果
SCD队列患者与任何一个对照组之间,10年全因LF翻修的累积发病率均无显著差异(每组比较P>0.05)。此外,SCD队列与任何一个对照组在LF翻修适应证或手术并发症方面也无显著差异(每组比较P>0.05)。
结论
本研究表明,SCD患者进行LF翻修的风险及其任何适应证均未增加。