特应性皮炎治疗偏好研究:定量研究的系统评价。
Treatment Preference Research in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies.
机构信息
Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Research Unit, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
出版信息
Patient. 2024 Sep;17(5):519-535. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00698-3. Epub 2024 May 9.
BACKGROUND
Treatment preference research can support shared and informed decision making for currently available atopic dermatitis (AD) treatments, and simultaneously guide research and development for future therapies. In this systematic literature review, we aimed to provide an overview of preferences for AD treatments.
METHODS
This systematic literature review was conducted in the Medline and Embase (via Ovid) databases, supplemented by manual searching. Quantitative research published from 2010 to September 2023 that investigated preferences for AD treatments were included. Quality assessment was conducted by using the purpose, respondents, explanation, findings, significance checklist, and a checklist developed by the Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research.
RESULTS
In total, 207 references were screened after removing duplicates and 15 studies were included. Most studies were conducted in the US, followed by European countries. On average, people directly or indirectly affected by AD rate efficacy and treatment-related risk as the most important criteria when choosing an AD therapy. Participants are willing to increase risks in order to have a higher chance of achieving a certain benefit, e.g. reduction in itch or clearer skin. Participants have preferences for different modes of administration. On average, 68% (all full-text studies) and 87% (only discrete choice experiments [DCEs]) of quality criteria per reference were rated as fulfilled. DCEs received generally higher quality assessment scores than non-DCEs.
CONCLUSIONS
This review revealed that AD treatment preference research is limited. Diverse study designs hampered comparison and synthesis of the results. We recommend conducting more DCEs in this field to increase the likelihood of AD patients receiving the therapy that best fits their individual needs and preferences.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
This protocol was published in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023468757).
背景
治疗偏好研究可以支持当前可用的特应性皮炎(AD)治疗方案的共同决策和知情决策,同时为未来的治疗方法指导研究和开发。在这项系统文献综述中,我们旨在概述 AD 治疗的偏好。
方法
本系统文献综述在 Medline 和 Embase(通过 Ovid)数据库中进行,同时进行了手动搜索。纳入了自 2010 年至 2023 年 9 月发表的、调查 AD 治疗偏好的定量研究。使用目的、受访者、解释、发现、意义检查表和由健康经济学和结果研究专业协会制定的检查表对质量进行评估。
结果
在去除重复项后共筛选出 207 篇参考文献,最终纳入 15 项研究。大多数研究在美国进行,其次是欧洲国家。平均而言,受 AD 直接或间接影响的人在选择 AD 治疗时将疗效和与治疗相关的风险视为最重要的标准。参与者愿意增加风险,以提高实现特定获益的机会,例如减轻瘙痒或使皮肤更清晰。参与者对不同的给药方式有偏好。平均而言,参考资料中 68%(所有全文研究)和 87%(仅离散选择实验[DCE])的质量标准得到满足。DCE 通常比非 DCE 获得更高的质量评估分数。
结论
本综述表明 AD 治疗偏好研究有限。不同的研究设计妨碍了结果的比较和综合。我们建议在该领域进行更多的 DCE,以增加 AD 患者接受最符合其个体需求和偏好的治疗的可能性。
临床试验注册
本方案在 PROSPERO 上注册(ID:CRD42023468757)。