Saker Ali A, Mousa Mudar Mohammad, Hajeer Mohammad Y, Haddad Ibrahim, Alhaffar Jacqueline Bashar, Youssef Mohamed
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus, SYR.
Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus, SYR.
Cureus. 2024 May 8;16(5):e59861. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59861. eCollection 2024 May.
Background This study aimed to determine if individuals with skeletal Class II and skeletal Class III malocclusions had different levels of masticatory muscle activity. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study, conducted at the University of Damascus, investigated the myoelectric activity of perioral muscles in patients with Class II and III malocclusions. The sample size of 60 patients was determined according to a prior sample size calculation. Patients were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into Class II and III groups. Electromyography was used to monitor the activity of various muscles, including the temporalis, masseter, orbicularis oris, buccinator, mentalis, and digastric muscles. Results The study found similar muscle activity within the same group in the temporalis, masseter, buccinator, digastric, and orbicularis oris muscles. No significant differences were observed between the Class II and III groups for several oral and perioral muscles (P > 0.05). However, the mean activity of the digastric muscle was significantly greater in the Class II group (P < 0.05), whereas the mean activity of the mentalis muscle was smaller in the Class II group (P < 0.05). Conclusions Perioral muscles influence facial complex development and jaw relationship, affecting orthodontic treatment. Digastric muscle activity is greater in Class II patients, while mental muscle activity is smaller in Class III patients. Further studies are needed for older age groups and other skeletal malocclusion types.
背景 本研究旨在确定骨骼型II类和骨骼型III类错牙合患者的咀嚼肌活动水平是否存在差异。
材料与方法 这项横断面研究在大马士革大学进行,调查了II类和III类错牙合患者口周肌肉的肌电活动。根据先前的样本量计算确定了60名患者的样本量。患者根据特定的纳入和排除标准进行选择,并分为II类和III类组。采用肌电图监测颞肌、咬肌、口轮匝肌、颊肌、颏肌和二腹肌等各种肌肉的活动。
结果 研究发现,颞肌、咬肌、颊肌、二腹肌和口轮匝肌在同一组内的肌肉活动相似。II类和III类组的几种口腔和口周肌肉之间未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,II类组中二腹肌的平均活动明显更大(P<0.05),而II类组中颏肌的平均活动较小(P<0.05)。
结论 口周肌肉影响面部复合体发育和颌骨关系,影响正畸治疗。II类患者的二腹肌活动更大,而III类患者的颏肌活动更小。对于老年人群和其他骨骼型错牙合类型,还需要进一步研究。