Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Science of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 10;103(19):e38196. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038196.
There have been various clinical studies on the effect of dietary inflammatory index (DII) on circulating inflammatory biomarkers, but the findings from these are contradictory. The aim of the present study was to clarify any association.
The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library database were searched for relevant studies from inception February 2021. There were no language restrictions. Two investigators independently selected eligible studies. Measures of association were pooled by using an inverse-variance weighted random-effects model. The heterogeneity among studies was examined using the I2 index. Publication bias, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also performed.
A total of 13 cross-sectional studies were identified, involving 54,813 participants. The adjusted pooled OR of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels for the highest (the most pro-inflammatory diet) versus lowest (the most anti-inflammatory diet) DII categories was 1.25 (95% CI: 1.18-1.32; I2 = 59.4%, P = .002). Subgroup analyses suggested the main source of study heterogeneity was the geographic area (Asia, Europe, or USA) and CRP levels (>3 mg/L or others). This finding was remarkably robust in the sensitivity analysis.
The meta-analysis suggests that more pro-inflammatory DII scores were positively associated with CRP, the DII scores can be useful to assess the diet inflammatory properties and its association with low-grade inflammation.
已有多项临床研究探讨了饮食炎症指数(DII)对循环炎症生物标志物的影响,但研究结果存在矛盾。本研究旨在阐明两者之间的关联。
检索 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,从建库至 2021 年 2 月检索相关研究,无语言限制。由 2 名研究者独立筛选合格研究。采用逆方差加权随机效应模型汇总关联度测量值。使用 I2 指数检验研究间的异质性。还进行了发表偏倚、敏感性和亚组分析。
共纳入 13 项横断面研究,涉及 54813 名参与者。调整后的 DII 最高(最促炎饮食)与最低(最抗炎饮食)类别之间 CRP 水平的合并比值比为 1.25(95%CI:1.18-1.32;I2=59.4%,P=0.002)。亚组分析表明,研究异质性的主要来源是地域(亚洲、欧洲或美国)和 CRP 水平(>3mg/L 或其他)。这一发现通过敏感性分析证明了其稳健性。
荟萃分析表明,DII 评分越高,促炎作用越强,与 CRP 水平呈正相关。DII 评分可用于评估饮食的炎症特性及其与低度炎症的关系。