Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2024 Jul;178:104551. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104551. Epub 2024 May 8.
Stressful life events (SLEs) are tightly coupled with the emergence of anxiety and depression symptoms among adolescents, but the mechanisms underlying this relationship remain poorly understood. We investigated within-person fluctuations in emotion regulation as a mechanism linking SLEs and internalizing psychopathology in an intensive longitudinal study. We examined how monthly fluctuations in SLEs were related to engagement in three emotion regulation strategies-acceptance, reappraisal, and rumination-and whether these strategies were associated with changes in internalizing symptoms in adolescents followed for one year (N = 30; n = 355 monthly observations). Bayesian hierarchical models revealed that on months when adolescents experienced more SLEs than was typical for them, they also engaged in more rumination, which, in turn, was associated with higher anxiety and depression symptoms and mediated the prospective relationship between SLEs and internalizing symptoms. In contrast, greater use of acceptance and reappraisal selectively moderated the association between stressors and internalizing symptoms, resulting in stronger links between SLEs and symptoms. These results suggest that emotion regulation strategies play different roles in the stress-psychopathology relationship. Understanding how changes in emotion regulation contribute to increases in internalizing symptoms following experiences of stress may provide novel targets for interventions aimed at reducing stress-related psychopathology.
生活应激事件(SLEs)与青少年焦虑和抑郁症状的出现密切相关,但这种关系的机制仍知之甚少。我们通过一项密集的纵向研究,调查了情绪调节的个体内波动作为 SLEs 与内化心理病理学之间联系的机制。我们研究了 SLEs 的月度波动与三种情绪调节策略的参与程度(接受、重新评估和反刍)之间的关系,以及这些策略是否与一年内随访的青少年内化症状的变化有关(N=30;n=355 个月度观察)。贝叶斯层次模型显示,在青少年经历比典型情况更多 SLEs 的月份,他们也更多地进行反刍,而反刍又与更高的焦虑和抑郁症状相关,并在 SLEs 和内化症状之间的前瞻性关系中起中介作用。相比之下,更多地使用接受和重新评估策略选择性地调节了应激源和内化症状之间的关系,导致 SLEs 和症状之间的联系更强。这些结果表明,情绪调节策略在应激-心理病理学关系中发挥着不同的作用。了解情绪调节的变化如何导致应激后内化症状的增加,可能为旨在减少与应激相关的心理病理学的干预措施提供新的目标。