School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 230 Park Ave. Florham Park, New Jersey 07932, USA.
School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 230 Park Ave. Florham Park, New Jersey 07932, USA.
J Chromatogr A. 2024 Jul 5;1726:464973. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.464973. Epub 2024 May 7.
Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) offers different selectivity than reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC). However, our knowledge of the driving force for selectivity is limited and there is a need for a better understanding of the selectivity in HILIC. Quantitative assessment of retention mechanisms makes it possible to investigate selectivity based on understanding the underlying retention mechanisms. In this study, selected model compounds from the Ikegami selectivity tests were evaluated on different polar stationary phases. The study results revealed significant insights into the selectivity in HILIC. First, hydroxy and methylene selectivity is driven by hydrophilic partitioning; but surface adsorption for 2-deoxyuridine or 5-methyluridine reduces the selectivity factor. Furthermore, the retention of 2-deoxyuridine or 5-methyluridine by surface adsorption in combination with the phase ratio explain the difference in hydroxy or methylene selectivity observed among different stationary phases. Investigations on xanthine positional isomers (1-methylxanthine/3-methylxanthine, theophylline/theobromine) indicate that isomeric selectivity is controlled by surface adsorption; however, hydrophilic partitioning may contribute to resolution by enhancing overall retention. In addition, two pairs of nucleoside isomers (adenosine/vidarabine, 2'-deoxy and 3'-deoxyguanosine) provide an example that isomeric selectivity can also be controlled by hydrophilic partitioning if their partitioning coefficients are significantly different in HILIC. Although more data is needed, the current study provides a mechanistic based understanding of the selectivity in HILIC and potentially a new way to design selectivity tests.
亲水作用色谱(HILIC)提供了与反相液相色谱(RPLC)不同的选择性。然而,我们对选择性驱动力的了解有限,需要更好地理解 HILIC 中的选择性。保留机制的定量评估使我们能够根据对底层保留机制的理解来研究选择性。在这项研究中,从 Ikegami 选择性测试中选择的模型化合物在不同的极性固定相上进行了评估。研究结果深入了解了 HILIC 中的选择性。首先,羟基和亚甲基选择性是由亲水分配驱动的;但表面吸附 2-脱氧尿苷或 5-甲基尿苷会降低选择性因子。此外,表面吸附与相比例结合保留 2-脱氧尿苷或 5-甲基尿苷可解释不同固定相中观察到的羟基或亚甲基选择性差异。对黄嘌呤位置异构体(1-甲基黄嘌呤/3-甲基黄嘌呤、茶碱/可可碱)的研究表明,异构体选择性由表面吸附控制;然而,亲水分配可能通过增强整体保留来有助于分辨率。此外,两对核苷异构体(腺苷/阿昔洛韦、2'-脱氧和 3'-脱氧鸟苷)提供了一个例子,如果它们在 HILIC 中的分配系数有显著差异,那么异构体选择性也可以由亲水分配控制。尽管需要更多的数据,但目前的研究为 HILIC 中的选择性提供了基于机制的理解,并可能为设计选择性测试提供了一种新方法。