Suppr超能文献

乌干达保护区的“生物多样性补偿”:恢复森林生物多样性的途径?

"Biodiversity Offsetting" in Uganda's Protected Areas: A Pathway to Restoration of Forest Biodiversity?

机构信息

Department of Geography, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Environmental Management, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;73(6):1134-1149. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01982-6. Epub 2024 May 10.

Abstract

With limited national financing for conservation, there is an increasing interest in using biodiversity offset funds to strengthen protected area management. Offsetting measures can potentially be used in the restoration of degraded protected areas. However, there are concerns related to the uncertainty of restoration outcomes and time-lags before the expected benefits can be observed. Using a case of the Gangu Central Forest Reserve in central Uganda, we contribute empirical findings showing the potential and limitations of biodiversity offsetting by means of the restoration of a degraded forest reserve. We use forest cover change analysis and community surveys to determine forest changes after eight years of offset implementation, and forest inventories to analyse the current forest structure and composition to ascertain taxonomic diversity recovery. The results revealed that biodiversity offsetting led to a 21% increase in Tropical High Forest cover, and enhanced restoration of forest species composition and diversity. However, attaining permanence of the restoration benefits requires the regulation of community forest resource access and use. Strengthening forest management capacity to monitor the offset sites and compensating impacted communities for foregone forest resource benefits are crucial for the successful implementation of biodiversity offsets.

摘要

由于国家对保护的资金投入有限,人们越来越感兴趣地利用生物多样性补偿基金来加强保护区的管理。补偿措施可以用于退化保护区的恢复。然而,人们对恢复结果的不确定性以及预期效益需要时间才能显现表示担忧。本文以乌干达中部的甘古中央森林保护区为例,提供了一些实证研究结果,表明通过恢复退化的森林保护区来实现生物多样性补偿的潜力和局限性。我们利用森林覆盖变化分析和社区调查来确定补偿实施八年后的森林变化情况,并利用森林清查来分析当前的森林结构和组成,以确定分类多样性的恢复情况。结果表明,生物多样性补偿导致热带高山森林覆盖率增加了 21%,并促进了森林物种组成和多样性的恢复。然而,要实现恢复效益的永久性,需要对社区森林资源的利用进行监管。加强森林管理能力,以监测补偿地点,并对受影响的社区因放弃森林资源收益而进行补偿,这对于成功实施生物多样性补偿至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceca/11136839/30ebc753c4f4/267_2024_1982_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
"Biodiversity Offsetting" in Uganda's Protected Areas: A Pathway to Restoration of Forest Biodiversity?
Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;73(6):1134-1149. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01982-6. Epub 2024 May 10.
3
The effects of restoring logged tropical forests on avian phylogenetic and functional diversity.
Ecol Appl. 2017 Sep;27(6):1932-1945. doi: 10.1002/eap.1578. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
4
Evaluating the potential of biodiversity offsets to achieve net gain.
Conserv Biol. 2023 Aug;37(4):e14094. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14094. Epub 2023 May 25.
5
Biodiversity responses to restoration across the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 May 15;821:153403. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153403. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
6
Developing fine-grained nationwide predictions of valuable forests using biodiversity indicator bird species.
Ecol Appl. 2022 Mar;32(2):e2505. doi: 10.1002/eap.2505. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
7
A meta-analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics.
Conserv Biol. 2015 Dec;29(6):1695-703. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12548. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
8
Geospatial assessment and monitoring of historical forest cover changes (1920-2012) in Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, Western Ghats, India.
Environ Monit Assess. 2014 Dec;186(12):8125-40. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3991-3. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
9
Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation.
Nature. 2016 Jul 7;535(7610):144-7. doi: 10.1038/nature18326. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Comparing the success of active and passive restoration in a tropical cloud forest landscape: A multi-taxa fauna approach.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0242020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242020. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Incentives for landscape restoration: Lessons from Shinyanga, Tanzania.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111831. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111831. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
2
Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century.
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7828):217-227. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2773-z. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):23209-23215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908221116. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests.
Sci Adv. 2017 Nov 8;3(11):e1701345. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701345. eCollection 2017 Nov.
5
Conservation: Stop misuse of biodiversity offsets.
Nature. 2015 Jul 23;523(7561):401-3. doi: 10.1038/523401a.
6
The performance and potential of protected areas.
Nature. 2014 Nov 6;515(7525):67-73. doi: 10.1038/nature13947.
7
Great apes and biodiversity offset projects in Africa: the case for national offset strategies.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 5;9(11):e111671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111671. eCollection 2014.
8
Policy development for environmental licensing and biodiversity offsets in Latin America.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 5;9(9):e107144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107144. eCollection 2014.
9
Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
Ecol Appl. 2014 Jun;24(4):617-32. doi: 10.1890/13-0243.1.
10
Mining and biodiversity offsets: a transparent and science-based approach to measure "no-net-loss".
J Environ Manage. 2014 Oct 1;143:61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.027. Epub 2014 May 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验