Suppr超能文献

在症状学和精神共病方面,误诊的单相 I 型双相障碍与双相 II 型障碍和重性抑郁症之间的临床差异。

Clinical distinctions in symptomatology and psychiatric comorbidities between misdiagnosed bipolar I and bipolar II disorder versus major depressive disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.

Division of Mood Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 10;24(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05810-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To explore the demographic and clinical features of current depressive episode that discriminate patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) from those with bipolar I (BP-I) and bipolar II (BP-II) disorder who were misdiagnosed as having MDD .

METHODS

The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) assessment was performed to establish DSM-IV diagnoses of MDD, and BP-I and BP-II, previously being misdiagnosed as MDD. Demographics, depressive symptoms and psychiatric comorbidities were compared between 1463 patients with BP-I, BP-II and MDD from 8 psychiatric settings in mainland China. A multinomial logistic regression model was performed to assess clinical correlates of diagnoses.

RESULTS

A total of 14.5% of the enrolled patients initially diagnosed with MDD were eventually diagnosed with BP. Broad illness characteristics including younger age, higher prevalence of recurrence, concurrent dysthymia, suicidal attempts, agitation, psychotic features and psychiatric comorbidities, as well as lower prevalence of insomnia, weight loss and somatic symptoms were featured by patients with BP-I and/or BP-I, compared to those with MDD. Comparisons between BP-I and BP-II versus MDD indicated distinct symptom profiles and comorbidity patterns with more differences being observed between BP-II and MDD, than between BP-I and MDD .

CONCLUSION

The results provide evidence of clinically distinguishing characteristics between misdiagnosed BP-I and BP- II versus MDD. The findings have implications for guiding more accurate diagnoses of bipolar disorders.

摘要

背景

探讨当前抑郁发作的人口统计学和临床特征,以区分被误诊为重度抑郁症(MDD)的单相障碍(BP-I)和双相障碍 II 型(BP-II)患者与 MDD 的患者。

方法

采用 Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview(MINI)评估,以确定 DSM-IV 诊断 MDD、BP-I 和 BP-II,这些患者之前被误诊为 MDD。比较中国大陆 8 家精神科机构的 1463 名 BP-I、BP-II 和 MDD 患者的人口统计学、抑郁症状和精神共病情况。采用多项逻辑回归模型评估诊断的临床相关性。

结果

总共 14.5%的入组患者最初被诊断为 MDD,最终被诊断为 BP。BP 患者具有广泛的疾病特征,包括年龄较小、复发率较高、伴发心境恶劣、自杀企图、激越、精神病特征和精神共病,以及失眠、体重减轻和躯体症状的发生率较低,与 MDD 患者相比。BP-I 和/或 BP-II 与 MDD 相比,BP-I 和 BP-II 之间的症状谱和共病模式存在明显差异,BP-II 与 MDD 之间的差异比 BP-I 与 MDD 之间的差异更为明显。

结论

这些结果提供了证据,证明了误诊的 BP-I 和 BP-II 与 MDD 之间存在临床鉴别特征。这些发现对于指导更准确的双相障碍诊断具有意义。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis and Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Review.双相情感障碍的诊断与治疗:综述
JAMA. 2023 Oct 10;330(14):1370-1380. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.18588.
2
Anxiety in bipolar disorder: A review of publication trends.双相情感障碍中的焦虑:文献发表趋势综述。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 1;320:340-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.057. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
3
The state of mental health care in China.中国的精神卫生保健状况。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2022 Mar;69:102975. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102975. Epub 2021 Dec 25.
7
The existential crisis of bipolar II disorder.双相II型障碍的生存危机。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2020 Jan 28;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40345-019-0175-7.
10
Bipolar II Disorder Is NOT a Myth.双相II型障碍并非虚构。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;64(8):537-540. doi: 10.1177/0706743719852096.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验