Taylor Taryn, Columbus Lauren, Banner Harrison, Seemann Natashia, Duncliffe Trevor Hines, Pack Rachael
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital, 800 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada.
Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 May 10;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00293-4.
Although speaking up is lauded as a critical patient safety strategy, it remains exceptionally challenging for team members to enact. Existing efforts to address the problem of silence among interprofessional teams involve training low-authority members to use direct language and unambiguous challenge scripts. The role or value of indirect communication in preventing medical error remains largely unexplored despite its pervasiveness among interprofessional teams. This study explores the role of indirect challenges in the face of medical error and professionalism lapses.
Obstetricians at one academic center participated in an interprofessional simulation as a partial actor. Thirteen iterations were completed with 39 participants (13 obstetrician consultants, 11 obstetric residents, 2 family medicine consultants, 5 midwives, and 8 obstetrical nurses). Thirty participants completed a subsequent semi-structured interview. Five challenge moments were scripted for the obstetrician involving deliberate clinical judgment errors or professionalism infractions. Other participants were unaware of the obstetrician's partial actor role. Scenarios were videotaped; debriefs and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a constructivist qualitative approach.
Low-authority team members primarily relied on indirect challenge scripts to promote patient safety during simulation. Faculty participants were highly receptive to indirect challenges from low-authority team members, particularly in front of awake patients. In the context of obstetric care, direct challenges were actually viewed by participants as threatening to patient trust and disruptive to the interprofessional team. Instead of exclusively focusing our efforts on encouraging low-authority team members to speak up through direct challenges, it may be fruitful to expand our attention toward teaching faculty to identify, listen for, and respond to the indirect, subtle challenges that are already prolific among interprofessional teams.
尽管直言不讳被赞誉为一项关键的患者安全策略,但团队成员在实际执行时仍极具挑战性。现有的解决跨专业团队中沉默问题的努力包括培训低级别成员使用直接的语言和明确的质疑话术。尽管间接沟通在跨专业团队中普遍存在,但其在预防医疗差错中的作用或价值在很大程度上仍未得到探索。本研究探讨了面对医疗差错和职业操守失误时间接质疑的作用。
一所学术中心的产科医生作为部分参与者参加了一次跨专业模拟。共完成了13次模拟,有39名参与者(13名产科顾问、11名产科住院医师、2名家庭医学顾问、5名助产士和8名产科护士)。30名参与者随后完成了一次半结构化访谈。为产科医生编写了五个质疑场景,涉及故意的临床判断错误或职业操守违规行为。其他参与者并不知道产科医生的部分参与者角色。模拟场景被录像;汇报和访谈进行了录音,并逐字转录,采用建构主义定性方法进行分析。
低级别团队成员在模拟过程中主要依靠间接质疑话术来促进患者安全。教员参与者对低级别团队成员的间接质疑反应强烈,尤其是在清醒患者面前。在产科护理背景下,参与者实际上认为直接质疑会威胁患者信任并破坏跨专业团队协作。与其仅仅专注于鼓励低级别团队成员通过直接质疑来直言不讳,扩大我们的关注范围,教导教员识别、倾听并回应跨专业团队中已经大量存在的间接、微妙的质疑,可能会有成效。