• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工神经网络与电阻点焊参数对AISI 304焊接接头质量影响的实验分析

Artificial Neural Networks and Experimental Analysis of the Resistance Spot Welding Parameters Effect on the Welded Joint Quality of AISI 304.

作者信息

Mezher Marwan T, Pereira Alejandro, Trzepieciński Tomasz, Acevedo Jorge

机构信息

Departamento de Deseño na Enxeñaría, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain.

Institute of Applied Arts, Middle Technical University, Baghdad 10074, Iraq.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2024 May 6;17(9):2167. doi: 10.3390/ma17092167.

DOI:10.3390/ma17092167
PMID:38730976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11085805/
Abstract

The automobile industry relies primarily on spot welding operations, particularly resistance spot welding (RSW). The performance and durability of the resistance spot-welded joints are significantly impacted by the welding quality outputs, such as the shear force, nugget diameter, failure mode, and the hardness of the welded joints. In light of this, the present study sought to determine how the aforementioned welding quality outputs of 0.5 and 1 mm thick austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 were affected by RSW parameters, such as welding current, welding time, pressure, holding time, squeezing time, and pulse welding. In order to guarantee precise evaluation and experimental analysis, it is essential that they are supported by a numerical model using an intelligent model. The primary objective of this research is to develop and enhance an intelligent model employing artificial neural network (ANN) models. This model aims to provide deeper knowledge of how the RSW parameters affect the quality of optimum joint behavior. The proposed neural network (NN) models were executed using different ANN structures with various training and transfer functions based on the feedforward backpropagation approach to find the optimal model. The performance of the ANN models was evaluated in accordance with validation metrics, like the mean squared error (MSE) and correlation coefficient (R). Assessing the experimental findings revealed the maximum shear force and nugget diameter emerged to be 8.6 kN and 5.4 mm for the case of 1-1 mm, 3.298 kN and 4.1 mm for the case of 0.5-0.5 mm, and 4.031 kN and 4.9 mm for the case of 0.5-1 mm. Based on the results of the Pareto charts generated by the Minitab program, the most important parameter for the 1-1 mm case was the welding current; for the 0.5-0.5 mm case, it was pulse welding; and for the 0.5-1 mm case, it was holding time. When looking at the hardness results, it is clear that the nugget zone is much higher than the heat-affected zone (HZ) and base metal (BM) in all three cases. The ANN models showed that the one-output shear force model gave the best prediction, relating to the highest R and the lowest MSE compared to the one-output nugget diameter model and two-output structure. However, the Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation (Trainlm) training function with the log sigmoid transfer function recorded the best prediction results of both ANN structures.

摘要

汽车工业主要依赖点焊操作,特别是电阻点焊(RSW)。电阻点焊接头的性能和耐久性会受到焊接质量输出的显著影响,如剪切力、熔核直径、失效模式以及焊接接头的硬度。有鉴于此,本研究旨在确定电阻点焊参数(如焊接电流、焊接时间、压力、保持时间、挤压时间和脉冲焊接)如何影响0.5毫米和1毫米厚的奥氏体不锈钢AISI 304的上述焊接质量输出。为了确保精确的评估和实验分析,必须有一个使用智能模型的数值模型作为支撑。本研究的主要目标是开发和改进一个采用人工神经网络(ANN)模型的智能模型。该模型旨在更深入地了解电阻点焊参数如何影响最佳接头行为的质量。所提出的神经网络(NN)模型基于前馈反向传播方法,使用具有不同训练和传递函数的不同ANN结构来执行,以找到最优模型。根据验证指标(如均方误差(MSE)和相关系数(R))对ANN模型的性能进行评估。对实验结果的评估表明,对于1-1毫米的情况,最大剪切力和熔核直径分别为8.6 kN和5.4毫米;对于0.5-0.5毫米的情况,分别为3.298 kN和4.1毫米;对于0.5-1毫米的情况,分别为4.031 kN和4.9毫米。根据Minitab程序生成的帕累托图结果,对于1-1毫米的情况,最重要的参数是焊接电流;对于0.5-0.5毫米的情况,是脉冲焊接;对于0.5-1毫米的情况,是保持时间。从硬度结果来看,显然在所有三种情况下,熔核区都远高于热影响区(HZ)和母材(BM)。ANN模型表明,与单输出熔核直径模型和双输出结构相比,单输出剪切力模型给出了最佳预测,其R值最高且MSE值最低。然而,具有对数Sigmoid传递函数的Levenberg-Marquardt反向传播(Trainlm)训练函数记录了两种ANN结构的最佳预测结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/90c8f1caf7c0/materials-17-02167-g031.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/262613006039/materials-17-02167-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/d5a33a6f1981/materials-17-02167-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/e5e3e7e221bc/materials-17-02167-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/87c182bc0805/materials-17-02167-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/39e763c235d8/materials-17-02167-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/88d63e9b13db/materials-17-02167-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/07dd2f791c78/materials-17-02167-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/eb175eaa19f6/materials-17-02167-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/464e3fba2c82/materials-17-02167-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/97685abe24f6/materials-17-02167-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/b4f4055e4fd3/materials-17-02167-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/c3fe428d5f16/materials-17-02167-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/ed54ab5b31a3/materials-17-02167-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/de2db6d96403/materials-17-02167-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/03726e89eb44/materials-17-02167-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/31bae4f4c762/materials-17-02167-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/ef3645f75083/materials-17-02167-g017a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/d0b61dee36e8/materials-17-02167-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/895157352fd8/materials-17-02167-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/d0a09194c6ab/materials-17-02167-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/81cd5fe1f40c/materials-17-02167-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/e2f3b75c5cbc/materials-17-02167-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/37836139e7ad/materials-17-02167-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/7490c0ea2ebc/materials-17-02167-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/6addaf5d6b30/materials-17-02167-g025.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/928256debe0a/materials-17-02167-g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/721d54aae354/materials-17-02167-g027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/f92ad2ac230a/materials-17-02167-g028.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/2d614c6313ca/materials-17-02167-g029.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/a219b451cf8a/materials-17-02167-g030.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/90c8f1caf7c0/materials-17-02167-g031.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/262613006039/materials-17-02167-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/d5a33a6f1981/materials-17-02167-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/e5e3e7e221bc/materials-17-02167-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/87c182bc0805/materials-17-02167-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/39e763c235d8/materials-17-02167-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/88d63e9b13db/materials-17-02167-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/07dd2f791c78/materials-17-02167-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/eb175eaa19f6/materials-17-02167-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/464e3fba2c82/materials-17-02167-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/97685abe24f6/materials-17-02167-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/b4f4055e4fd3/materials-17-02167-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/c3fe428d5f16/materials-17-02167-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/ed54ab5b31a3/materials-17-02167-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/de2db6d96403/materials-17-02167-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/03726e89eb44/materials-17-02167-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/31bae4f4c762/materials-17-02167-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/ef3645f75083/materials-17-02167-g017a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/d0b61dee36e8/materials-17-02167-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/895157352fd8/materials-17-02167-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/d0a09194c6ab/materials-17-02167-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/81cd5fe1f40c/materials-17-02167-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/e2f3b75c5cbc/materials-17-02167-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/37836139e7ad/materials-17-02167-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/7490c0ea2ebc/materials-17-02167-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/6addaf5d6b30/materials-17-02167-g025.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/928256debe0a/materials-17-02167-g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/721d54aae354/materials-17-02167-g027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/f92ad2ac230a/materials-17-02167-g028.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/2d614c6313ca/materials-17-02167-g029.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/a219b451cf8a/materials-17-02167-g030.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d06/11085805/90c8f1caf7c0/materials-17-02167-g031.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial Neural Networks and Experimental Analysis of the Resistance Spot Welding Parameters Effect on the Welded Joint Quality of AISI 304.人工神经网络与电阻点焊参数对AISI 304焊接接头质量影响的实验分析
Materials (Basel). 2024 May 6;17(9):2167. doi: 10.3390/ma17092167.
2
Substituting Resistance Spot Welding with Flexible Laser Spot Welding to Join Ultra-Thin Foil of Inconel 718 to Thick 410 Steel.用柔性激光点焊替代电阻点焊将Inconel 718超薄箔与410厚钢连接。
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 9;15(9):3405. doi: 10.3390/ma15093405.
3
An Exploratory Study on Resistance Spot Welding of Titanium Alloy Ti-6Al-4V.钛合金Ti-6Al-4V电阻点焊的探索性研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 30;14(9):2336. doi: 10.3390/ma14092336.
4
Modeling and Experimental Research on Resistance Spot Welded Joints for Dual-Phase Steel.双相钢电阻点焊连接的建模与实验研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Apr 3;12(7):1108. doi: 10.3390/ma12071108.
5
Classification of spot-welded joint strength using ultrasonic signal time-frequency features and PSO-SVM method.基于超声信号时频特征和 PSO-SVM 方法的焊点强度分类。
Ultrasonics. 2019 Jan;91:161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
6
The Effect of Welding Current and Electrode Force on the Heat Input, Weld Diameter, and Physical and Mechanical Properties of SS316L/TiAlV Dissimilar Resistance Spot Welding with Aluminum Interlayer.焊接电流和电极力对采用铝中间层的SS316L/TiAlV异种电阻点焊的热输入、焊缝直径以及物理和力学性能的影响
Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 27;14(5):1129. doi: 10.3390/ma14051129.
7
Prediction of Tool Eccentricity Effects on the Mechanical Properties of Friction Stir Welded AA5754-H24 Aluminum Alloy Using ANN Model.使用人工神经网络模型预测工具偏心对搅拌摩擦焊AA5754-H24铝合金力学性能的影响
Materials (Basel). 2023 May 17;16(10):3777. doi: 10.3390/ma16103777.
8
Correlation Tests of Ultrasonic Wave and Mechanical Parameters of Spot-Welded Joints.点焊接头超声波与力学参数的相关性测试
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 24;15(5):1701. doi: 10.3390/ma15051701.
9
Laser Dissimilar Welding of AISI 430F and AISI 304 Stainless Steels.AISI 430F与AISI 304不锈钢的激光异种焊接
Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 13;13(20):4540. doi: 10.3390/ma13204540.
10
Effect of Welding Current on Weld Formation, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties in Resistance Spot Welding of CR590T/340Y Galvanized Dual Phase Steel.焊接电流对CR590T/340Y镀锌双相钢电阻点焊焊缝成型、微观组织及力学性能的影响
Materials (Basel). 2018 Nov 17;11(11):2310. doi: 10.3390/ma11112310.

引用本文的文献

1
Inverse Neural Network Approach for Optimizing Chemical Composition in Shielded Metal Arc Weld Metals.用于优化焊条电弧焊焊缝金属化学成分的逆神经网络方法
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 1;18(11):2592. doi: 10.3390/ma18112592.
2
Predicting the Effect of RSW Parameters on the Shear Force and Nugget Diameter of Similar and Dissimilar Joints Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Multilayer Perceptron.使用机器学习算法和多层感知器预测旋转摩擦点焊参数对相似和异种接头剪切力和熔核直径的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 20;17(24):6250. doi: 10.3390/ma17246250.
3
Application of machine learning and neural network models based on experimental evaluation of dissimilar resistance spot-welded joints between grade 2 titanium alloy and AISI 304 stainless steel.
基于2级钛合金与AISI 304不锈钢异种电阻点焊接头实验评估的机器学习和神经网络模型应用
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 4;10(24):e40898. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40898. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.
4
Development of a Quality Control System Using Modal Analysis to Evaluate a Multi-Point Projection Welding Process.利用模态分析开发质量控制系统以评估多点凸焊工艺
Materials (Basel). 2024 Oct 13;17(20):5005. doi: 10.3390/ma17205005.
5
Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation of Stainless-Steel Resistance Spot Welding Based on Spiral C-Scan Technique.基于螺旋C扫描技术的不锈钢电阻点焊超声无损检测与评估
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 23;24(15):4771. doi: 10.3390/s24154771.
6
Analysis of the Microstructure and Mechanical Performance of Resistance Spot-Welding of Ti6Al4V to DP600 Steel Using Copper/Gold Cold-Sprayed Interlayers.使用铜/金冷喷涂中间层对Ti6Al4V与DP600钢进行电阻点焊的微观结构和力学性能分析。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 2;17(13):3251. doi: 10.3390/ma17133251.