• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于2级钛合金与AISI 304不锈钢异种电阻点焊接头实验评估的机器学习和神经网络模型应用

Application of machine learning and neural network models based on experimental evaluation of dissimilar resistance spot-welded joints between grade 2 titanium alloy and AISI 304 stainless steel.

作者信息

Mezher Marwan T, Pereira Alejandro, Shakir Rusul Ahmed, Trzepieciński Tomasz

机构信息

Departamento de Deseño na Enxeñaría, Universidade de Vigo, 36310, Vigo, Spain.

Institute of Applied arts, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, 10074, Iraq.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Dec 4;10(24):e40898. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40898. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40898
PMID:39720089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11667624/
Abstract

The use of a composite welded joint consisting of titanium and austenitic stainless steel metals is evidently a favourable selection for industrial applications employing the resistance spot welding (RSW) operation. Nevertheless, achieving a high-quality welded joint proved challenging owing to the properties of the diverse range of materials' used. To improve the quality of dissimilar welded joints, the welding parameters should be selected precisely. With that in mind, the current research endeavoured to figure out the ideal RSW parameters for a dissimilar resistance spot-welded joint between grade 2 titanium alloy (Ti) and AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel (ASS) with equal and unequal thicknesses of 0.5 and 1 mm. The RSW cases based on the selected thickness were referred to as the following: similar thickness of 1 mm for Ti and ASS as case E, dissimilar thickness of 0.5 mm for Ti and 1 mm for ASS as case F, dissimilar thickness of 0.5 mm for ASS and 1 mm for Ti as case I, and similar thickness of 0.5 mm as case J. Tensile shear force, failure mode, and micro-hardness were the metrics used to assess the dissimilar joint's soundness. The RSW variables utilized in the scope of the present investigation were "welding current, pressure, welding time, squeeze time, holding time, and pulse welding". Models from gradient boosting, CatBoost, and random forest machine learning (ML) algorithms were used to guarantee an accurate analysis, along with the artificial neural network regressions. Therefore, the ML and artificial neural network (ANN) models were trained using real data collected from 100 experimental RSW samples conducted under different RSW process parameters. Various transfer and training functions were applied with the multilayer perceptron employing the feed-forward-back propagation approach when building the ANN models. Also, for the first time in the RSW field, an estimation of the relative importance of the RSW variables regarding the predicted shear force is presented in the current study. Evaluating the experimental findings demonstrated that the highest shear force was 2.183, 2.589, 1.708, and 1.851 kN for cases E, F, I, and J. The micro-hardness data indicated that the nugget zone had a much higher hardness than the heat-affected zone (HAZ) and base metal (BM) zones, wherein case F showed the peak nugget hardness in comparison to the other cases. The best prediction model was found to be the ANN model when training the conjugate gradient with the Polak-Ribiere updates (Traincgp) training function with the hyperbolic tangent sigmoid transfer function (Tansig) with the mean squared error (MSE) and correlation coefficient (R) values recorded as 0.01886 and 0.94973, respectively. However, the random forest algorithm gave the second best prediction of the MSE while the CatBoost and gradient boosting algorithms were third and fourth, respectively. The automotive and aerospace sectors are anticipated to benefit from the present research in applications associated with body component production that result in a superior strength-to-weight ratio.

摘要

使用由钛和奥氏体不锈钢金属组成的复合焊接接头显然是采用电阻点焊(RSW)操作的工业应用的一个有利选择。然而,由于所使用的材料种类繁多,要获得高质量的焊接接头被证明具有挑战性。为了提高异种焊接接头的质量,应精确选择焊接参数。考虑到这一点,当前的研究致力于找出2级钛合金(Ti)和AISI 304奥氏体不锈钢(ASS)之间厚度相等和不相等(分别为0.5毫米和1毫米)的异种电阻点焊接头的理想RSW参数。基于所选厚度的RSW情况如下:Ti和ASS的厚度均为1毫米的相似厚度情况E、Ti为0.5毫米且ASS为1毫米的不同厚度情况F、ASS为0.5毫米且Ti为1毫米的不同厚度情况I以及厚度均为0.5毫米的相似厚度情况J。拉伸剪切力、失效模式和显微硬度是用于评估异种接头质量的指标。本研究范围内使用的RSW变量为“焊接电流、压力、焊接时间、挤压时间、保持时间和脉冲焊接”。使用梯度提升、CatBoost和随机森林机器学习(ML)算法的模型以及人工神经网络回归来确保准确分析。因此,ML和人工神经网络(ANN)模型使用从在不同RSW工艺参数下进行的100个实验RSW样本收集的实际数据进行训练。在构建ANN模型时,对多层感知器应用了各种传递和训练函数,并采用前馈-反向传播方法。此外,在RSW领域中,本研究首次给出了关于预测剪切力的RSW变量相对重要性的估计。对实验结果的评估表明,情况E、F、I和J的最高剪切力分别为2.183、2.589、1.708和1.851千牛。显微硬度数据表明,熔核区的硬度远高于热影响区(HAZ)和母材(BM)区,其中情况F与其他情况相比显示出熔核硬度峰值。当使用带有双曲正切Sigmoid传递函数(Tansig)的共轭梯度与Polak-Ribiere更新(Traincgp)训练函数进行训练时,发现最佳预测模型是ANN模型,记录的均方误差(MSE)和相关系数(R)值分别为0.01886和0.94973。然而,随机森林算法给出了第二好的MSE预测,而CatBoost和梯度提升算法分别位列第三和第四。预计汽车和航空航天领域将从本研究中受益,这些研究应用于与车身部件生产相关的领域,从而实现卓越的强度重量比。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/23a209979c7d/gr32.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/097fcde2911e/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/9e33fcec45a6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/c7325d6b3645/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/26b35d16582f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/8f9b7b6dfe18/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/0a3739658757/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/ea5bb54b48c1/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/c1989157190e/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/8d110443e5cd/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/ec1d90ecbb95/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/4c9e68d5f6c5/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/829687e68f5c/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/ce8ced886e2b/gr12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/1a31e15cf254/gr13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/96e8abcb4e67/gr14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/6bdde7d8a836/gr15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/a593e56ab79a/gr16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/fe99318ef66b/gr17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/13a58169b4d4/gr18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/c1253060d95b/gr19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/16089d693d2c/gr20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/2814627808c5/gr21.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/4f5221bfd718/gr22.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/c17a48ff3f4c/gr23.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/5f88ec42cc3e/gr24.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/905f42a1208d/gr25.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/5908de43a76d/gr26.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/22e0f9a20384/gr27.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/e1e053f18d61/gr28.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/9bdd2f91af9a/gr29.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/b8ae771253f2/gr30.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/a2ac9b114bc3/gr31.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/23a209979c7d/gr32.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/097fcde2911e/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/9e33fcec45a6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/c7325d6b3645/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/26b35d16582f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/8f9b7b6dfe18/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/0a3739658757/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/ea5bb54b48c1/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/c1989157190e/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/8d110443e5cd/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/ec1d90ecbb95/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/4c9e68d5f6c5/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/829687e68f5c/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/ce8ced886e2b/gr12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/1a31e15cf254/gr13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/96e8abcb4e67/gr14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/6bdde7d8a836/gr15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/a593e56ab79a/gr16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/fe99318ef66b/gr17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/13a58169b4d4/gr18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/c1253060d95b/gr19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/16089d693d2c/gr20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/2814627808c5/gr21.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/4f5221bfd718/gr22.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/c17a48ff3f4c/gr23.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/5f88ec42cc3e/gr24.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/905f42a1208d/gr25.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/5908de43a76d/gr26.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/22e0f9a20384/gr27.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/e1e053f18d61/gr28.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/9bdd2f91af9a/gr29.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/b8ae771253f2/gr30.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/a2ac9b114bc3/gr31.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d43/11667624/23a209979c7d/gr32.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of machine learning and neural network models based on experimental evaluation of dissimilar resistance spot-welded joints between grade 2 titanium alloy and AISI 304 stainless steel.基于2级钛合金与AISI 304不锈钢异种电阻点焊接头实验评估的机器学习和神经网络模型应用
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 4;10(24):e40898. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40898. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.
2
Predicting the Effect of RSW Parameters on the Shear Force and Nugget Diameter of Similar and Dissimilar Joints Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Multilayer Perceptron.使用机器学习算法和多层感知器预测旋转摩擦点焊参数对相似和异种接头剪切力和熔核直径的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 20;17(24):6250. doi: 10.3390/ma17246250.
3
Artificial Neural Networks and Experimental Analysis of the Resistance Spot Welding Parameters Effect on the Welded Joint Quality of AISI 304.人工神经网络与电阻点焊参数对AISI 304焊接接头质量影响的实验分析
Materials (Basel). 2024 May 6;17(9):2167. doi: 10.3390/ma17092167.
4
Experimental investigation on solidification cracking & intergranular corrosion of AISI 321 & AISI 316 L dissimilar weld on pulsed current gas tungsten arc welding (PCGTAW).AISI 321与AISI 316L异种焊缝在脉冲电流钨极气体保护焊(PCGTAW)下凝固裂纹及晶间腐蚀的实验研究
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 22;10(15):e34648. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34648. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
5
Effect of welding parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar AISI 304/ductile cast iron fusion welded joints.焊接参数对AISI 304/球墨铸铁异种熔焊接头组织和力学性能的影响
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19827. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70050-0.
6
Laser Dissimilar Welding of AISI 430F and AISI 304 Stainless Steels.AISI 430F与AISI 304不锈钢的激光异种焊接
Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 13;13(20):4540. doi: 10.3390/ma13204540.
7
An Exploratory Study on Resistance Spot Welding of Titanium Alloy Ti-6Al-4V.钛合金Ti-6Al-4V电阻点焊的探索性研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 30;14(9):2336. doi: 10.3390/ma14092336.
8
Study on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Laser Welded Dissimilar Joint of P91 Steel and INCOLOY 800HT Nickel Alloy.P91钢与INCOLOY 800HT镍合金激光焊接异种接头的组织与力学性能研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 7;14(19):5876. doi: 10.3390/ma14195876.
9
Dissimilar Laser Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steel and Abrasion-Resistant Steel: Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties Enhanced by Post-Weld Heat Treatment.奥氏体不锈钢与耐磨钢的异种激光焊接:焊后热处理强化的微观组织演变及力学性能
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 26;14(19):5580. doi: 10.3390/ma14195580.
10
Substituting Resistance Spot Welding with Flexible Laser Spot Welding to Join Ultra-Thin Foil of Inconel 718 to Thick 410 Steel.用柔性激光点焊替代电阻点焊将Inconel 718超薄箔与410厚钢连接。
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 9;15(9):3405. doi: 10.3390/ma15093405.

引用本文的文献

1
Inverse Neural Network Approach for Optimizing Chemical Composition in Shielded Metal Arc Weld Metals.用于优化焊条电弧焊焊缝金属化学成分的逆神经网络方法
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 1;18(11):2592. doi: 10.3390/ma18112592.
2
Predicting the Effect of RSW Parameters on the Shear Force and Nugget Diameter of Similar and Dissimilar Joints Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Multilayer Perceptron.使用机器学习算法和多层感知器预测旋转摩擦点焊参数对相似和异种接头剪切力和熔核直径的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 20;17(24):6250. doi: 10.3390/ma17246250.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of the Microstructure and Mechanical Performance of Resistance Spot-Welding of Ti6Al4V to DP600 Steel Using Copper/Gold Cold-Sprayed Interlayers.使用铜/金冷喷涂中间层对Ti6Al4V与DP600钢进行电阻点焊的微观结构和力学性能分析。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 2;17(13):3251. doi: 10.3390/ma17133251.
2
Artificial Neural Networks and Experimental Analysis of the Resistance Spot Welding Parameters Effect on the Welded Joint Quality of AISI 304.人工神经网络与电阻点焊参数对AISI 304焊接接头质量影响的实验分析
Materials (Basel). 2024 May 6;17(9):2167. doi: 10.3390/ma17092167.
3
The Effect of Machine Learning Algorithms on the Prediction of Layer-by-Layer Coating Properties.
机器学习算法对逐层涂层性能预测的影响
ACS Omega. 2023 Jan 30;8(5):4677-4686. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c06471. eCollection 2023 Feb 7.
4
A working guide to boosted regression trees.提升回归树实用指南。
J Anim Ecol. 2008 Jul;77(4):802-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8.