Department of Philosophy, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA; School of Liberal Arts (SOLA), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Jun;28(6):504-516. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 May 10.
Concepts of empathy, sympathy and compassion are often confused in a variety of literatures. This article proposes a pattern-theoretic approach to distinguishing compassion from empathy and sympathy. Drawing on psychology, Western philosophy, affective neuroscience, and contemplative science, we clarify the nature of compassion as a specific pattern of dynamically related factors that include physiological, cognitive, and affective processes, relational/intersubjective processes, and motivational/action tendencies. We also show that the dynamic nature of the compassion pattern is reflected in neuroscientific findings, as well as in compassion practice. The pattern theory of compassion allows us to make several clear distinctions between compassion, empathy, and sympathy.
在各种文献中,同理心、同情心和怜悯心的概念经常被混淆。本文提出了一种基于模式理论的方法,用于区分怜悯和同理心、同情心。通过借鉴心理学、西方哲学、情感神经科学和冥想科学,我们阐明了怜悯作为一种特定模式的本质,这种模式由包括生理、认知和情感过程、关系/主体间过程以及动机/行动倾向等动态相关因素组成。我们还表明,怜悯模式的动态性质反映在神经科学研究结果以及怜悯实践中。怜悯的模式理论使我们能够在怜悯、同理心和同情心之间做出一些明确的区分。