Suppr超能文献

急救人员作为研究人员:从培训到实践,参与研究活动的急救人员观点的系统评价。

Paramedics as Researchers: A Systematic Review of Paramedic Perspectives of Engaging in Research Activity From Training to Practice.

机构信息

Midwifery and Allied Health, Staffordshire University, Stafford, Staffordshire, UK.

Nursing and Midwifery, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;66(6):e680-e689. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need for a stronger evidence-base in paramedicine has precipitated a rapid development of prehospital research agendas. Paramedics are increasingly involved in research, leading to changes in their role. Yet, the integration of research responsibilities has proven to be challenging, resulting in varying attitudes and levels of engagement.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to explore paramedics' views and experiences of research as researchers during training and within practice.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed across six databases. Qualitative empirical peer-reviewed articles that discussed paramedic perspectives on engaging with research activity were included. Of 10,594 articles identified initially, 11 were included in the final synthesis after quality appraisal. Data were extracted and subjected to narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

The following four themes were identified: motivation to engage, moral dilemmas, structural issues within the profession, and reflections on trial involvement. Attitudes toward research, understanding of related concepts, and the drive for patient benefit were interwoven core issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Research was highly valued when links to patient benefit were obvious, however, this review highlights some cultural resistance to research, particularly regarding informed consent and changes to standard practice. Paramedic research methods training should provide structured opportunities to explore concerns and emphasize the role of research in developing a high-quality evidence base to underpin safe practice. Currently, there is inadequate organizational support for paramedics to engage effectively in research activity, with minimal allocations of time, training, and remuneration. Without properly integrating research activity into the paramedic role, their capacity to engage with research activity is limited.

摘要

背景

在急救医学领域,对更强有力的证据基础的需求促使院前研究议程迅速发展。护理人员越来越多地参与研究,导致其角色发生变化。然而,研究责任的整合被证明是具有挑战性的,导致态度和参与程度的差异。

目的

本系统评价旨在探讨护理人员在培训期间和实践中作为研究人员对研究的看法和经验。

方法

在六个数据库中进行了系统搜索。纳入了讨论护理人员对参与研究活动的看法的定性实证同行评审文章。最初确定了 10594 篇文章,经过质量评估后,有 11 篇文章被纳入最终综合分析。提取数据并进行叙述性综合。

结果

确定了以下四个主题:参与的动机、道德困境、该专业内的结构问题,以及对试验参与的反思。对研究的态度、对相关概念的理解以及对患者受益的推动是相互交织的核心问题。

结论

当与患者受益的联系显而易见时,研究受到高度重视,但本综述强调了对研究的一些文化抵制,特别是在知情同意和改变标准实践方面。护理人员研究方法培训应提供探索关注问题的结构化机会,并强调研究在为安全实践提供高质量证据基础方面的作用。目前,没有为护理人员提供足够的组织支持,使其能够有效地参与研究活动,研究活动的时间、培训和薪酬分配都很少。如果没有将研究活动恰当地整合到护理人员的角色中,他们参与研究活动的能力将受到限制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验