Department of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vocational School of Health Services, Mus Alparslan University, Mus, Turkey.
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Aug;131(4):1145-1162. doi: 10.1177/00315125241254130. Epub 2024 May 12.
We compared children with hemiplegic and diplegic cerebral palsy (CP) using the conceptual framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Child and Youth version (ICF-CY). We enrolled 42 children with CP aged 5 - 13 years old ( age = 9.57, = 2.8 years). We assessed their trunk control and dynamic balance with the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and we used ABILHAND-Kids and Assessment of Life Habits (Life-H) to assess their manual ability and participation with activities of daily living. We administered the European Child Environment Questionnaire (ECEQ) to identify relevant environmental factors. We employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to identify specific factors contributing to potential differences between these CP groups. Children with hemiplegic CP demonstrated significantly better outcomes in terms of trunk control, dynamic balance, and environmental factors compared to those with diplegic CP ( < .05). In contrast, children with diplegic CP demonstrated superior outcomes regarding manual ability, compared to those with hemiplegic CP ( < .001). In our structural equation models, trunk control strongly predicted both dynamic balance (0.75) and environmental factors (0.74). Moreover, the relationships between trunk control and participation in daily and social activities were 0.54 and 0.47, respectively. Impaired trunk control and dynamic balance were significant contributors to increased activity restrictions and environmental barriers in children with diplegic CP. This suggests that improving disability and functioning in children with diplegic CP requires a focus on trunk control training and dynamic balance exercises.
我们使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类:儿童和青少年版(ICF-CY)的概念框架比较了偏瘫型和双瘫型脑瘫(CP)患儿。我们纳入了 42 名 5-13 岁(年龄=9.57,标准差=2.8 岁)的 CP 患儿。我们使用躯干控制测量量表(TCMS)和计时起身行走测试(TUG)评估他们的躯干控制和动态平衡,使用 ABILHAND-Kids 和生活习惯评估(Life-H)评估他们的手功能和日常生活活动参与情况。我们采用欧洲儿童环境问卷(ECEQ)来确定相关的环境因素。我们采用结构方程模型(SEM)来确定导致这些 CP 组之间潜在差异的具体因素。与双瘫型 CP 患儿相比,偏瘫型 CP 患儿的躯干控制、动态平衡和环境因素明显更好(<0.05)。相比之下,双瘫型 CP 患儿的手功能明显优于偏瘫型 CP 患儿(<0.001)。在我们的结构方程模型中,躯干控制强烈预测动态平衡(0.75)和环境因素(0.74)。此外,躯干控制与日常生活和社会活动参与之间的关系分别为 0.54 和 0.47。躯干控制和动态平衡受损是导致双瘫型 CP 患儿活动受限和环境障碍增加的重要因素。这表明,改善双瘫型 CP 患儿的残疾和功能需要关注躯干控制训练和动态平衡练习。