Kar Sonali, Samantaray Pramod C, Patnaik Liwa, Mishra Alpana, Lakshmi Priyanka
Faculty Department of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Tutor T, Department of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Mar;13(3):958-963. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1367_23. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
It is a proven fact that women are affected by poor mental health predominantly in the postnatal period. This is authenticated by the use of a validated and tested Edinburg Postnatal Depression scale (EPNS), which is a simple tool to measure depression among women after delivery by posing 10 questions and this is also validated in Odia language. Odisha has made laudable progress in delivering Maternal and Child Health care to women even in tribal-dominated districts through its robust Comprehensive Obstetrics care network restricting home delivery almost to a mere 4%-5% and reducing maternal deaths by 60%-70% as per the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5). As a part of an Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) extramural project to enhance contraceptive acceptance among males in districts that had a total fertility rate (TFR) higher than 3, a qualitative objective to measure mean postnatal depression in the early postpartum period (who are also the target to advocate contraceptive acceptance) was undertaken. A secondary objective was to compare family care vs. facility care as greater attributing factors for higher EPNS scores.
Due to time constraints, the study was done on a fast-track mode wherein two villages each from the sampled blocks of Koraput and Boudh (with one of the highest birth rates) were selected. All women in villages who had a baby aged between 1 and 6 months, were the sampling frame and only those were selected who consented. A questionnaire was used that elicited information on familial sociodemographic details and also facility-based antenatal care (ANC) and postdelivery services that were availed for the last-born child. General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) scores were used as an independent variable and a proxy measure of cumulative familial stress. Descriptives and log regression were used to measure the odds of family vs. facility-based services.
A total of 98 women, 50 from Boudh and 48 from Koraput, participated in the study. Koraput's mean EPNS scores were 6 points higher than Boudh indicating much higher postnatal poor mental health. Log models showed that there was no difference between facility-based care in both districts as both reported 96%-97.3% institutional delivery, with out-of-pocket expenditure (OOP) being less than 520 Indian rupees on average and nearly 100% reported receipt of iron folic acid and calcium as well as streamlined Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) services. However, the odds of men's participation in Family planning was 2.77 times less in Koraput (SD = 2.582), fourth birth order 1.33 odds, and female gender 5.66 odds higher for the district as a result of which GHQ 12 score mean was 21.00 (CI: 19.18-22.82) hinting very high psychological stress as compared with Boudh where the mean was 17 (CI: 14.59-19.41).
This clearly indicates that a robust healthcare delivery alone will not be able to address the holistic health of women in the childbearing age group. Familial stressors compound poor mental health and hence counseling of the family as a whole is necessary to achieve sound mental health in women in the postnatal period. The spousal role is emerging as a strong determinant, especially in terms of nonacceptance or casual approach to contraceptive use. Interestingly, a skewed gender bias is noted for the female child, which is also a contributor to postnatal depression (PND) in both districts, though a bigger sample would be needed to statistically prove it.
事实证明,女性在产后阶段极易受到心理健康问题的影响。这一点通过使用经过验证和测试的爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPNS)得到了证实,该量表是一种简单的工具,通过提出10个问题来测量产后女性的抑郁情况,并且该量表也已在奥里亚语中得到验证。奥里萨邦通过其强大的综合产科护理网络,在为妇女提供孕产妇和儿童保健方面取得了值得称赞的进展,即使在部落主导的地区也是如此,将家庭分娩几乎减少到仅4%-5%,根据全国家庭健康调查(NFHS-5),孕产妇死亡率降低了60%-70%。作为印度医学研究理事会(ICMR)一项校外项目的一部分,该项目旨在提高总生育率(TFR)高于3的地区男性对避孕措施的接受度,为此设定了一个定性目标,即测量产后早期的平均产后抑郁情况(这些女性也是倡导避孕接受度的目标对象)。第二个目标是比较家庭护理与机构护理,看哪一个是导致EPNS得分较高的更主要因素。
由于时间限制,该研究采用快速模式进行,从科拉普特和布德(出生率最高的地区之一)的抽样街区中各选择了两个村庄。村庄中所有1至6个月大婴儿的母亲作为抽样框架,仅选择那些同意参与的母亲。使用了一份问卷,该问卷收集了家庭社会人口学细节以及为最后出生的孩子提供的基于机构的产前护理(ANC)和产后服务的信息。一般健康问卷-12(GHQ-12)得分用作自变量和累积家庭压力的替代指标。使用描述性统计和逻辑回归来衡量家庭服务与机构服务的几率。
共有98名女性参与了研究,其中50名来自布德,48名来自科拉普特。科拉普特的平均EPNS得分比布德高6分,表明产后心理健康状况差得多。逻辑模型显示,两个地区基于机构的护理之间没有差异,因为两个地区报告的机构分娩率均为96%-97.3%,自付费用(OOP)平均低于520印度卢比,近100%的人报告接受了铁叶酸和钙以及简化的贾纳尼·苏拉卡莎·尤贾纳(JSY)服务。然而,科拉普特男性参与计划生育的几率低2.77倍(标准差=2.582),第四胎出生顺序的几率低1.33倍,该地区女性性别几率高5.66倍,因此GHQ 12得分平均为21.00(置信区间:19.18-22.82),这表明与布德相比心理压力非常高,布德的平均分为17(置信区间:14.59-19.41)。
这清楚地表明,仅靠强大的医疗保健服务无法解决育龄妇女的整体健康问题。家庭压力源会加剧心理健康问题,因此有必要对整个家庭进行咨询,以实现产后妇女的良好心理健康。配偶的角色正成为一个重要的决定因素,特别是在对避孕措施的不接受或随意态度方面。有趣的是,在两个地区都发现了对女童的性别偏见,这也是产后抑郁症(PND)的一个促成因素,不过需要更大的样本才能从统计学上证明这一点。