National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland.
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 20;21(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03190-6.
Perinatal common mental disorders are associated with significant adverse outcomes for women and their families, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. Early detection through screening with locally-validated tools can improve outcomes.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar for articles on the validation of screening tools for common mental disorders in perinatal women in India, with no language or date restrictions. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. We used bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models to calculate pooled summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Heterogeneity was assessed by visualising the distance of individual studies from the summary curve.
Seven studies involving 1003 women were analysed. All studies assessed the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in identifying perinatal depression. No validation studies of any other screening tools were identified. Using a common threshold of ≥13 the EPDS had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 88·9% (95%CI 77·4-94·9) and 93·4 (95%CI 81·5-97·8), respectively. Using optimal thresholds (range ≥ 9 to ≥13) the EPDS had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 94·4% (95%CI 81·7-98·4) and 90·8 (95%CI 83·7-95·0), respectively.
The EPDS is psychometrically valid in diverse Indian settings and its use in routine maternity care could improve detection of perinatal depression. Further research is required to validate screening tools for other perinatal common mental disorders in India.
围产期常见精神障碍与妇女及其家庭的重大不良后果相关,尤其是在中低收入环境中。通过使用经过当地验证的工具进行筛查可以早期发现这些问题,从而改善结局。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、全球卫生、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar,以获取有关印度围产期妇女常见精神障碍筛查工具验证的文章,不限制语言和日期。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估质量。我们使用双变量和分层汇总受试者工作特征模型来计算敏感性和特异性的汇总估计值。通过可视化个体研究与汇总曲线的距离来评估异质性。
纳入了 7 项共纳入 1003 名妇女的研究。所有研究均评估了爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)在识别围产期抑郁症中的有效性。未发现任何其他筛查工具的验证研究。使用共同的截断值≥13,EPDS 的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 88.9%(95%CI 77.4-94.9)和 93.4%(95%CI 81.5-97.8)。使用最佳截断值(范围≥9 至≥13)时,EPDS 的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 94.4%(95%CI 81.7-98.4)和 90.8%(95%CI 83.7-95.0)。
EPDS 在印度的不同环境中具有心理测量学上的有效性,在常规产妇保健中使用它可以提高围产期抑郁症的检出率。需要进一步研究来验证印度其他围产期常见精神障碍的筛查工具。