Suppr超能文献

基于伦理、饮食和宗教偏好满足患者的用药需求。

Embracing Medication Needs of Patients based on Ethical, Dietary, and Religious Preferences.

作者信息

Tieu Lena, Uchi Jasmine, Patel Nirva, Meghani Mihir, Patel Padmaja, Nguyen Yen

机构信息

Gilead, Foster City, CA, USA (LT); VeganMed, Vacaville, CA, USA (JU, YN); Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, USA (NP); Hindu American Foundation, Washington, DC, USA (MM); and American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO, USA (PP).

出版信息

Am J Lifestyle Med. 2022 Oct 30;18(3):351-363. doi: 10.1177/15598276221135538. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.

Abstract

Many patients seek medications without animal-derived ingredients for a multitude of reasons. The purpose of this comprehensive qualitative review is to assess current literature on the topic of animal-free medications and identify the roles that key stakeholders can play in addressing the needs of these patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar from inception to June 2022 to identify key articles surrounding the topic of animal-free ingredients and medications. The need for animal-free medications impacts not just vegans and vegetarians, but also those with dietary restrictions due to other beliefs. Three key stakeholder initiatives can address the needs of these patients: 1) Healthcare professionals (HCPs) should strive to select appropriate medications considering their patients' religious and/or cultural background; 2) patients must be involved and notify their providers about their dietary requirements; 3) pharmaceutical industry and manufacturers need to consider animal-free product formulations and provide clear labeling. There is a rising interest in animal-free medications and several organizations and advocacy groups have raised concerns for easier access to these medications. However, more regulatory guidance or oversight is needed. For the nearly 25% animal-free medications available in the market, independent certification marks would facilitate informed consumer decision-making.

摘要

许多患者出于多种原因寻求不含动物成分的药物。这篇全面的定性综述的目的是评估当前关于无动物药物主题的文献,并确定关键利益相关者在满足这些患者需求方面可以发挥的作用。从创刊到2022年6月,我们在PubMed和谷歌学术上进行了全面的文献检索,以确定围绕无动物成分和药物主题的关键文章。对无动物药物的需求不仅影响纯素食者和素食者,也影响那些因其他信仰而有饮食限制的人。三项关键的利益相关者举措可以满足这些患者的需求:1)医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)应根据患者的宗教和/或文化背景,努力选择合适的药物;2)患者必须参与进来,并告知其医疗服务提供者他们的饮食要求;3)制药行业和制造商需要考虑无动物产品配方,并提供清晰的标签。人们对无动物药物的兴趣日益浓厚,一些组织和倡导团体对更方便获取这些药物表示关切。然而,还需要更多的监管指导或监督。对于市场上近25%的无动物药物,独立认证标志将有助于消费者做出明智的决策。

相似文献

6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7

本文引用的文献

3
Veganism: Are future pharmacists ready to provide advice?素食主义:未来的药师是否准备好提供建议?
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 May;13(5):512-519. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
5
Porcine Mucosal Heparin Shortage Crisis! What Are the Options?猪黏膜肝素短缺危机!有哪些应对方案?
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619878786. doi: 10.1177/1076029619878786.
7
"Inactive" ingredients in oral medications.口服药物中的“赋形剂”。
Sci Transl Med. 2019 Mar 13;11(483). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau6753.
9
Effective diversity, equity, and inclusion practices.有效的多元化、公平性和包容性实践。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2018 Sep;31(5):196-199. doi: 10.1177/0840470418773785. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验