Department of Sports Dentistry, Tokyo Dental College, 1-2-2 Masago, Mihama-ku, Chiba 261-8502, Japan.
J Prosthodont Res. 2011 Oct;55(4):214-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Mar 27.
We have developed a new type of laminated mouthguard, the Hard & Space mouthguard, which incorporates a hard material insert and a space to prevent contact between the mouthguard and the buccal surfaces of the teeth. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of this new design on shock absorption.
Three types of mouthguard (a conventional laminated EVA mouthguard and two 3-layer type "Hard & Space" mouthguards made of 1.8-mm or 3.0-mm thick pre-laminated material (Konbiplast) and EVA with a 1.0-mm space) were impacted. Shock absorption was measured by means of a pendulum type steel ball impact testing machine at impact distances of 10, 20, and 30 cm and a dental study model with strain gauges attached to the lingual surfaces and an accelerometer fixed to the maxilla.
Distortion of the impacted tooth and acceleration of the model were significantly reduced by all types of mouthguard at all 3 impact distances. The effect of the mouthguard was remarkable in terms of tooth distortion: both thicknesses of Hard & Space mouthguard showed more than 90% shock absorption, compared with only approximately 55-78% with an EVA mouthguard. Furthermore, shock absorption with the thicker 3.0-mm Hard & Space mouthguard reached more than 95% at the highest impact power.
Within the limitations of this laboratory study, Hard & Space mouthguards showed significantly greater buffer capacity than a conventional EVA mouthguard in terms of tooth distortion at the 3 impact powers tested.
我们研发了一种新型的层压式口腔防护器,名为“硬&空间”口腔防护器,它包含一个硬质材料嵌入物和一个防止口腔防护器与牙齿颊面接触的空间。本研究旨在探究这种新型设计对减震效果的影响。
我们对三种口腔防护器(一种传统的层压 EVA 口腔防护器和两种 3 层结构的“硬&空间”口腔防护器,它们由 1.8 毫米或 3.0 毫米厚的预层压材料(Konbiplast)和 EVA 制成,中间有 1.0 毫米的间隔)进行了冲击实验。通过摆锤式钢球冲击试验机,在 10、20 和 30 厘米的冲击距离下,对附着于舌侧表面的牙列模型进行测量,同时在其上安装应变计和在上颌骨上固定加速度计,以测量减震效果。
在所有 3 个冲击距离下,所有类型的口腔防护器都能显著减少受冲击牙齿的变形和模型的加速度。在牙齿变形方面,防护器的效果非常显著:两种厚度的“硬&空间”口腔防护器的减震效果都超过 90%,而 EVA 口腔防护器的减震效果仅为约 55-78%。此外,在最高冲击功率下,较厚的 3.0 毫米“硬&空间”口腔防护器的减震效果超过 95%。
在本实验室研究的限制范围内,与传统的 EVA 口腔防护器相比,“硬&空间”口腔防护器在 3 种测试冲击功率下对牙齿变形的缓冲能力明显更强。