• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善南非儿童的营养与健康状况:让营养不良或感染艾滋病毒儿童的母亲/照料者以及医护人员作为共同设计者参与其中,以加强一项地方质量改进干预措施。

Improving childhood nutrition and wellness in South Africa: involving mothers/caregivers of malnourished or HIV positive children and health care workers as co-designers to enhance a local quality improvement intervention.

作者信息

van Deventer Claire, Robert Glenn, Wright Anne

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Rural Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Phillip Tobias Building, York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Health Care Quality & Innovation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 5;16(a):358. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1574-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-016-1574-4
PMID:27495148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4975875/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of children admitted to a hospital in a South African sub-district in 2010 were severely malnourished and - when concurrently HIV positive - were not correctly initiated on antiretroviral therapy. Audit data over a subsequent four year period revealed that 60 % of malnourished children admitted to the hospital were HIV positive. To supplement an ongoing local quality improvement (QI) intervention addressing poor nutritional outcomes in children in this setting, Experience-based Co-design (EBCD) was used to enhance previously low levels of mother, carer and staff engagement.

METHODS

EBCD was implemented over an 8 month period. Non-participant observation was conducted comprising a total of 10 h in 5 different clinical locations. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 14 purposively selected staff members as well as 10 mothers/caregivers. The staff interviews were audio-taped whilst the mothers/caregiver interviews were filmed; both sets of experiences were analysed for key 'touchpoints'. Mothers/caregivers and staff participated in separate feedback events and then came together to identify their shared priorities for improving the service. Participants worked together in 3 smaller co-design teams to implement improvements.

RESULTS

There was overlap in staff and mother/carer views as to their priorities for QI. However, whilst staff typically highlighted pragmatic issues, mothers/caregivers were more likely to identify experiential and relational issues. A total of 38 QI interventions were proposed after the priorities had been discussed and delegated to the 3 co-design teams; 25 of these changes had been implemented or were being planned for by the end of the study period. Examples included: a point of care blood machine being bought to shorten the time in the emergency department whilst waiting for laboratory results; a play area being organised for children attending the HIV clinic; the development of three standard operating procedures to improve clinical handover and waiting times; and privacy screens installed to improve privacy in reception.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of EBCD was noted both in practical improvements focused on a better experience for mothers/caregivers and children within the system and in reflections from stakeholders as to the value added to the ongoing QI intervention by the co-design process.

摘要

背景

2010年,南非一个分区医院收治的很大一部分儿童严重营养不良,同时感染艾滋病毒的儿童未正确开始接受抗逆转录病毒治疗。随后四年的审计数据显示,入院的营养不良儿童中有60%感染了艾滋病毒。为了补充正在进行的旨在改善该地区儿童营养不良状况的当地质量改进(QI)干预措施,采用了基于经验的协同设计(EBCD)来提高此前较低的母亲、护理人员和工作人员参与度。

方法

EBCD在8个月的时间内实施。进行了非参与性观察,在5个不同的临床地点共观察10小时。对14名经过有目的挑选的工作人员以及10名母亲/照顾者进行了半结构化访谈。工作人员访谈进行了录音,而母亲/照顾者访谈进行了录像;对两组经历都分析了关键的“接触点”。母亲/照顾者和工作人员分别参加了反馈活动,然后共同确定他们改善服务的共同优先事项。参与者在3个较小的协同设计团队中共同努力实施改进措施。

结果

工作人员与母亲/照顾者在质量改进优先事项上的看法存在重叠。然而,工作人员通常强调实际问题,而母亲/照顾者更有可能指出体验和关系方面的问题。在讨论了优先事项并将其分配给3个协同设计团队后,共提出了38项质量改进干预措施;到研究期结束时,其中25项变更已实施或正在计划中。示例包括:购买一台即时检测血液机器,以缩短在急诊科等待实验室结果的时间;为参加艾滋病毒诊所的儿童组织一个游乐区;制定三项标准操作程序以改善临床交接和等待时间;安装隐私屏风以改善候诊区的隐私。

结论

EBCD的影响不仅体现在为系统内的母亲/照顾者和儿童提供更好体验的实际改进中,还体现在利益相关者对协同设计过程为正在进行的质量改进干预措施所增加价值的反思中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/52910ce583e9/12913_2016_1574_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/3f55aa77421e/12913_2016_1574_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/4e79baf4474a/12913_2016_1574_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/1d81c4c68af5/12913_2016_1574_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/3ee4c8e33433/12913_2016_1574_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/52910ce583e9/12913_2016_1574_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/3f55aa77421e/12913_2016_1574_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/4e79baf4474a/12913_2016_1574_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/1d81c4c68af5/12913_2016_1574_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/3ee4c8e33433/12913_2016_1574_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5554/4975875/52910ce583e9/12913_2016_1574_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving childhood nutrition and wellness in South Africa: involving mothers/caregivers of malnourished or HIV positive children and health care workers as co-designers to enhance a local quality improvement intervention.改善南非儿童的营养与健康状况:让营养不良或感染艾滋病毒儿童的母亲/照料者以及医护人员作为共同设计者参与其中,以加强一项地方质量改进干预措施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 5;16(a):358. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1574-4.
2
3
Training nurses to save lives of malnourished children.培训护士以拯救营养不良儿童的生命。
Curationis. 2006 Mar;29(1):73-8. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v29i1.1055.
4
Using experience-based co-design to improve the pre-treatment care pathway for people diagnosed with head and neck cancer.运用基于经验的共同设计来改善诊断为头颈部癌症患者的治疗前护理途径。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Feb;28(2):739-745. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04877-z. Epub 2019 May 28.
5
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a quality improvement intervention to support integration of maternal, child and HIV care in primary health care facilities in South Africa.评估一项质量改进干预措施在南非初级卫生保健机构中支持孕产妇、儿童和艾滋病护理整合的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8397-2.
6
Factors influencing uptake of HIV care and treatment among children in South Africa - a qualitative study of caregivers and clinic staff.影响南非儿童接受艾滋病护理和治疗的因素——一项针对照顾者和诊所工作人员的定性研究
AIDS Care. 2010 Sep;22(9):1101-7. doi: 10.1080/09540121003602218.
7
Using Experience-based Co-design with older patients, their families and staff to improve palliative care experiences in the Emergency Department: A reflective critique on the process and outcomes.与老年患者、其家属及工作人员采用基于经验的协同设计来改善急诊科的姑息治疗体验:对过程与结果的反思性批判
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Mar;68:83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
8
Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services.实施以患者为中心的癌症护理:运用基于经验的共同设计,改善乳腺癌和肺癌服务中的患者体验。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Nov;20(11):2639-47. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1470-3. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
9
Routine checks for HIV in children attending primary health care facilities in South Africa: attitudes of nurses and child caregivers.南非初级保健机构中接受常规艾滋病毒检查的儿童:护士和儿童看护者的态度。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(2):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
10
User-provider experiences of the implementation of KidzAlive-driven child-friendly spaces in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.用户-提供者对南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省实施 KidzAlive 驱动的儿童友好空间的体验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7712-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming Integrated Care Through Co-production: A Systematic Review Using Meta-ethnography.通过共同生产转变综合护理:一项运用元民族志的系统评价
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7603. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3
Introducing the Practice Dive Approach: an extension of co-creation in physical activity promotion and health promotion.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' involvement in improvement initiatives: a qualitative systematic review.患者参与改进举措:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):232-90. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1452.
2
Experience-based design for integrating the patient care experience into healthcare improvement: Identifying a set of reliable emotion words.基于经验的设计将患者护理体验融入医疗保健改进:确定一组可靠的情感词汇。
Healthc (Amst). 2013 Dec;1(3-4):91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
3
Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services.
引入实践潜水方法:在身体活动促进和健康促进中的共同创造的延伸。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii53-ii64. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab160.
4
Using an adaptive, codesign approach to strengthen clinic-level immunisation services in Khayelitsha, Western Cape Province, South Africa.采用适应性、协同设计方法加强南非西开普省凯萨蒂沙诊所的免疫服务。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004004.
5
Relationship between dietary inflammatory index, hs-CRP level in the second trimester and neonatal birth weight: a cohort study.孕期饮食炎症指数、孕中期hs-CRP水平与新生儿出生体重之间的关系:一项队列研究
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2020 Mar;66(2):163-167. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.19-100. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
6
Child-Centred Care in HIV Service Provision for Children in Resource Constrained Settings: A Narrative Review of Literature.资源受限环境下为儿童提供艾滋病服务的以儿童为中心的照护:文献综述
AIDS Res Treat. 2019 Nov 26;2019:5139486. doi: 10.1155/2019/5139486. eCollection 2019.
7
Care coordination for chronic and complex health conditions: An experienced based co-design study engaging consumer and clinician groups for service improvement.慢性病和复杂健康状况的护理协调:一项基于经验的共同设计研究,让消费者和临床医生群体参与服务改进。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 31;14(10):e0224380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224380. eCollection 2019.
8
Family physicians' experience and understanding of evidence-based practice and guideline implementation in primary care practice, Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦家庭医生在基层医疗实践中对循证实践和指南实施的经验与理解。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2019 May 27;11(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1592.
9
Views of Community Managers on Knowledge Co-creation in Online Communities for People With Disabilities: Qualitative Study.社区管理者对残疾人在线社区知识共创的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 10;19(10):e320. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7406.
患者和工作人员作为医疗服务的共同设计者。
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7714.
4
Exploring the Legacies of Filmed Patient Narratives: The Interpretation and Appropriation of Patient Films by Health Care Staff.探索患者影像叙事的遗产:医护人员对患者影片的解读与挪用
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1241-50. doi: 10.1177/1049732314566329. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
5
Laboratory information system data demonstrate successful implementation of the prevention of mother-to-child transmission programme in South Africa.实验室信息系统数据表明南非成功实施了预防母婴传播项目。
S Afr Med J. 2014 Mar;104(3 Suppl 1):235-8. doi: 10.7196/samj.7598.
6
Using a national archive of patient experience narratives to promote local patient-centered quality improvement: an ethnographic process evaluation of 'accelerated' experience-based co-design.利用患者体验叙述的国家档案促进以患者为中心的地方质量改进:“加速”基于体验的共同设计的人种学过程评估
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014 Oct;19(4):200-7. doi: 10.1177/1355819614531565. Epub 2014 May 19.
7
A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness.患者体验与临床安全性和有效性之间关联的证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 3;3(1):e001570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570.
8
The patient experience and health outcomes.患者体验与健康结局。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 17;368(3):201-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1211775. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
9
The patient satisfaction chasm: the gap between hospital management and frontline clinicians.患者满意度鸿沟:医院管理层与一线临床医生之间的差距。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):242-50. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001045. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
10
What does the patient know about quality?患者对质量了解多少?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):439-40. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs053. Epub 2012 Aug 22.