• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Risks of Restrictive Versus Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Applefeld Willard N, Ford Verity J, Cortes-Puch Irene, Wang Jeffrey, Sun Junfeng, Shields Tracy C, Danner Robert L, Eichacker Peter Q, Solomon Michael A, Klein Harvey G, Natanson Charles

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (W.N.A.).

Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center (V.J.F., J.S., R.L.D., P.Q.E., M.A.S., C.N.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jun;17(6):e010957. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.010957. Epub 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.010957
PMID:38747144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11186712/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c6/11186712/096a7cca9d59/hcq-17-e010957-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c6/11186712/096a7cca9d59/hcq-17-e010957-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60c6/11186712/096a7cca9d59/hcq-17-e010957-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risks of Restrictive Versus Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis.心血管疾病患者中限制性与宽松性红细胞输注策略的风险：一项更新的荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jun;17(6):e010957. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.010957. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
Restrictive Versus Liberal Strategy for Red Blood-Cell Transfusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Orthopaedic Patients.限制与宽松的红细胞输血策略：骨科患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Apr 18;100(8):686-695. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00375.
3
Risks of restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD): a meta-analysis.心血管疾病（CVD）患者采用限制性红细胞输血策略的风险：一项荟萃分析。
Transfus Med. 2018 Oct;28(5):335-345. doi: 10.1111/tme.12535. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
4
Red blood cell transfusion for people undergoing hip fracture surgery.髋部骨折手术患者的红细胞输血
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 21;2015(4):CD009699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009699.pub2.
5
A liberal strategy of red blood cell transfusion reduces cardiogenic shock in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery.输红细胞的宽松策略可减少老年心脏手术患者心原性休克。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Nov;150(5):1314-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.051. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
6
Effect of restrictive versus liberal red cell transfusion strategies on haemostasis: systematic review and meta-analysis.限制性与自由性红细胞输注策略对止血的影响：系统评价与荟萃分析
Thromb Haemost. 2017 May 3;117(5):889-898. doi: 10.1160/TH17-01-0015. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Safety of a Restrictive versus Liberal Approach to Red Blood Cell Transfusion on the Outcome of AKI in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.限制与宽松的红细胞输注策略对心脏手术患者急性肾损伤结局影响的安全性：一项随机临床试验。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Jul;30(7):1294-1304. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019010004. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
[Erythrocyte transfusions: an evidence-based approach].[红细胞输血：基于证据的方法]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 Jul-Aug;31(7-8):617-25. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.04.022. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
9
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.输血阈值指导红细胞输血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
10
Restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for red blood cell transfusion: systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.限制与宽松输血策略用于红细胞输血：系统评价随机试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 24;350:h1354. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1354.

引用本文的文献

1
Restrictive versus Liberal Transfusion in Myocardial Infarction - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.心肌梗死中限制性输血与自由输血的比较——一项患者水平的荟萃分析。
NEJM Evid. 2025 Feb;4(2):EVIDoa2400223. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2400223. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Restrictive versus liberal transfusion thresholds: lights and shadows.限制性与宽松输血阈值：利弊
Blood Transfus. 2025 Jan;23(1):93-95. doi: 10.2450/BloodTransfus.884. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
3
Hemoglobin-based transfusion strategies for cardiovascular and other diseases: restrictive, liberal, or neither?

本文引用的文献

1
Red Blood Cell Transfusion: 2023 AABB International Guidelines.红细胞输注：2023 AABB 国际指南。
JAMA. 2023 Nov 21;330(19):1892-1902. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.12914.
2
Six-Month Outcomes after Restrictive or Liberal Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术后限制输血与自由输血的 6 个月预后比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 27;379(13):1224-1233. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808561. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
3
Risks of restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD): a meta-analysis.心血管疾病（CVD）患者采用限制性红细胞输血策略的风险：一项荟萃分析。
基于血红蛋白的输血策略用于心血管和其他疾病：限制、宽松还是两者都不？
Blood. 2024 Nov 14;144(20):2075-2082. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024025927.
Transfus Med. 2018 Oct;28(5):335-345. doi: 10.1111/tme.12535. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
4
Randomization in clinical trials of titrated therapies: unintended consequences of using fixed treatment protocols.滴定疗法临床试验中的随机化：使用固定治疗方案的意外后果。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):1509-16. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000266584.40715.A6.
5
Association of hemoglobin levels with clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征中血红蛋白水平与临床结局的关联
Circulation. 2005 Apr 26;111(16):2042-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000162477.70955.5F. Epub 2005 Apr 11.