• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按疾病诊断相关分组付费对农村居民所获医疗服务的影响如何?来自中国的经验教训。

How does diagnosis-related group payment impact the health care received by rural residents? Lessons learned from China.

机构信息

Institute of Fiscal and Finance, Shandong Academy of Social Sciences, Jinan, China.

Department of Neurology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.

出版信息

Public Health. 2024 Jul;232:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.04.021
PMID:38749150
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is growing evidence that differences exist between rural and urban residents in terms of health, access to care and the quality of health care received, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To improve health equity and the performance of health systems, a diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment system has been introduced in many LMICs to reduce financial risk and improve the quality of health care. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of DRG payments on the health care received by rural residents in China, and to help policymakers identify and design implementation strategies for DRG payment systems for rural residents in LMICs.

STUDY DESIGN

Health impact assessment.

METHODS

This study compared the impact of DRG payments on the healthcare received by rural residents in China between the pre- and post-reform periods by applying a difference-in-difference (DID) methodology. The study population included individuals with three common conditions; namely, cerebral infarction, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI). Data on patient medical insurance type were assessed, and those who did not have rural insurance were excluded.

RESULTS

This study included 13,088 patients. In total, 33.63% were from Guangdong (n = 4401), 38.21% were from Shandong (n = 5002), and 28.16% were from Guangxi (n = 3685). The DID results showed that the implementation of DRGs was positively associated with hospitalization expense (β = 0.265, P = 0.000), treatment expense (β = 0.343, P = 0.002), drug expense (β = 0.607, P = 0.000), the spending of medical insurance funds (β = 0.711, P = 0.000) and out-of-pocket costs (β = 0.164, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that the implementation of DRG payments increases health care costs and the financial burden on health systems and rural patients in LMICs. This is contrary to the original intention of implementing the DRG payment system.

摘要

目的

越来越多的证据表明,农村和城市居民在健康、获得医疗服务的机会和接受的医疗服务质量方面存在差异,尤其是在中低收入国家(LMICs)。为了改善健康公平和卫生系统绩效,许多 LMICs 引入了按疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)付费系统,以降低财务风险并提高医疗质量。本研究旨在考察 DRG 支付对中国农村居民所获得的医疗服务的影响,并帮助决策者为 LMICs 的农村居民确定和设计 DRG 支付系统的实施策略。

研究设计

健康影响评估。

方法

本研究通过应用差异(DID)方法,比较了中国农村居民在改革前后 DRG 支付对其医疗服务的影响。研究人群包括三种常见疾病的患者:脑梗死、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和椎基底动脉供血不足(VBI)。评估了患者医疗保险类型的数据,排除了没有农村保险的患者。

结果

本研究共纳入 13088 名患者。其中,33.63%来自广东(n=4401),38.21%来自山东(n=5002),28.16%来自广西(n=3685)。DID 结果表明,DRGs 的实施与住院费用(β=0.265,P=0.000)、治疗费用(β=0.343,P=0.002)、药品费用(β=0.607,P=0.000)、医疗保险基金支出(β=0.711,P=0.000)和自付费用(β=0.164,P=0.000)呈正相关。

结论

本研究结果表明,DRG 支付的实施增加了中低收入国家卫生系统和农村患者的医疗服务成本和财务负担,这与实施 DRG 支付系统的初衷背道而驰。

相似文献

1
How does diagnosis-related group payment impact the health care received by rural residents? Lessons learned from China.按疾病诊断相关分组付费对农村居民所获医疗服务的影响如何?来自中国的经验教训。
Public Health. 2024 Jul;232:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 May 14.
2
Evaluating the effect of health insurance reform on health equity and financial protection for elderly in low- and middle-income countries: evidences from China.评估医疗保险改革对中低收入国家老年人口健康公平和财务保障的影响:来自中国的证据。
Global Health. 2024 Jul 30;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01062-8.
3
Evidence From the China Family Panel Studies Survey on the Effect of Integrating the Basic Medical Insurance System for Urban and Rural Residents on the Health Equity of Residents: Difference-in-Differences Analysis.来自中国家庭追踪调查的证据:城乡居民基本医疗保险整合对居民健康公平性的影响:双重差分分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 30;10:e50622. doi: 10.2196/50622.
4
Catastrophic expenditure due to out-of-pocket health payments and its determinants in Colombian households.哥伦比亚家庭因自付医疗费用导致的灾难性支出及其决定因素。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov 10;15(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0472-z.
5
Rural-urban differences in health outcomes, healthcare use, and expenditures among older adults under universal health insurance in China.中国全民健康保险下老年人健康结果、医疗保健使用和支出的城乡差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 12;15(10):e0240194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240194. eCollection 2020.
6
Effect of integrated urban and rural residents medical insurance on the utilisation of medical services by residents in China: a propensity score matching with difference-in-differences regression approach.城乡居民医疗保险对中国居民医疗服务利用的影响:倾向评分匹配与倍差法的差分回归分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e026408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026408.
7
Medical expenditure clustering and determinants of the annual medical expenditures of residents: a population-based retrospective study from rural China.居民医疗支出聚类及年度医疗支出的决定因素:一项基于中国农村人口的回顾性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 22;8(6):e022721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022721.
8
Catastrophic health expenditure in households with chronic disease patients: A pre-post comparison of the New Health Care Reform in Shaanxi Province, China.中国陕西省新医改前后慢性病患者家庭灾难性卫生支出变化分析
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 16;13(3):e0194539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194539. eCollection 2018.
9
Equity in health financing of Guangxi after China's universal health coverage: evidence based on health expenditure comparison in rural Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region from 2009 to 2013.广西全民健康覆盖后卫生筹资公平性研究:基于 2009-2013 年广西壮族自治区农村地区卫生支出比较的证据
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 29;16(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0669-9.
10
Analysis of the effect of serious illness medical insurance on relieving the economic burden of rural residents in China: a case study in Jinzhai County.分析大病医疗保险对减轻中国农村居民经济负担的影响:以金寨县为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 28;20(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05675-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost shifting or cost cutting by hospitals as a response to reimbursement reform? The case of diagnosis-related groups (DRG) scheme in China.医院通过成本转移或成本削减来应对报销改革?以中国的诊断相关分组(DRG)方案为例。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 20;13:1582001. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1582001. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of DRG payment reform on inpatient costs for different surgery types: an empirical analysis based on Chinese tertiary hospitals.疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)付费改革对不同手术类型住院费用的影响:基于中国三级医院的实证分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;13:1563204. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563204. eCollection 2025.
3
Multidisciplinary DRG management for rational medication in obstetrics: a cost analysis in Zhejiang Province.
产科合理用药的多学科疾病诊断相关分组管理:浙江省的成本分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 28;25(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12905-4.
4
Impact of China's diagnosis-intervention packet payment reform on pediatric pneumonia hospitalization costs: an interrupted time series analysis.中国诊断-干预组合式付费改革对儿童肺炎住院费用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2025 Apr 21;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12962-025-00623-x.
5
Assessing healthcare payment reforms' effects on economic inequities and catastrophic expenditures among cancer patients in ethnic minority regions of China.评估医疗支付改革对中国少数民族地区癌症患者经济不平等和灾难性支出的影响。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04040-y.
6
Evaluating the effect of health insurance reform on health equity and financial protection for elderly in low- and middle-income countries: evidences from China.评估医疗保险改革对中低收入国家老年人口健康公平和财务保障的影响:来自中国的证据。
Global Health. 2024 Jul 30;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01062-8.
7
Effects of a Diagnosis-Related Group Payment Reform on Length and Costs of Hospitalization in Sichuan, China: A Synthetic Control Study.中国四川按疾病诊断相关分组付费改革对住院时长和费用的影响:一项合成对照研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Jun 14;17:1623-1637. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S463276. eCollection 2024.