• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)付费改革对不同手术类型住院费用的影响:基于中国三级医院的实证分析

The impact of DRG payment reform on inpatient costs for different surgery types: an empirical analysis based on Chinese tertiary hospitals.

作者信息

Luo Mingwei, Li Hongying, Li Rongyue, Wu Yugao, Lan Yuping, Xie Shiwei

机构信息

Department of Medical Records Statistics, Panzhihua Central Hospital, Panzhihua, Sichuan, China.

Department of Medical Records Statistics, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;13:1563204. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563204. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563204
PMID:40529694
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12170532/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of DRG (Diagnosis-Related Group) payment reform on inpatient costs for four major types of surgery at a tertiary hospital in China, with a focus on its implementation in general surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, neurosurgery, and urology.

METHODS

Based on inpatient data from 2019 to 2023, the study employed Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and Difference-in-Differences (DiD) models to compare inpatient cost differences between the DRG payment group and the non-DRG payment group. Concentration indices were used to assess the consistency of inpatient cost distribution.

RESULTS

The DRG payment reform significantly reduced the total inpatient costs for surgeries in general surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, neurosurgery, and urology, particularly in terms of drug and material expenses. Additionally, the inpatient cost distribution in the DRG payment group became more concentrated, indicating a significant reduction in the proportion of high-cost cases.

CONCLUSION

The DRG payment reform effectively controlled inpatient costs in Chinese tertiary hospitals, particularly for complex surgical procedures, and improved the efficiency of healthcare resource utilization. This study provides empirical support for the further implementation of DRG payment reform and offers policy recommendations for optimizing China's healthcare payment system.

摘要

背景

评估疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)支付改革对中国一家三级医院四类主要手术住院费用的影响,重点关注其在普通外科、心胸外科、神经外科和泌尿外科的实施情况。

方法

基于2019年至2023年的住院数据,本研究采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)和双重差分(DiD)模型,比较DRG支付组和非DRG支付组之间的住院费用差异。使用集中度指数评估住院费用分布的一致性。

结果

DRG支付改革显著降低了普通外科、心胸外科、神经外科和泌尿外科手术的住院总费用,特别是在药品和材料费用方面。此外,DRG支付组的住院费用分布变得更加集中,表明高费用病例的比例显著降低。

结论

DRG支付改革有效控制了中国三级医院的住院费用,特别是对于复杂的外科手术,并提高了医疗资源利用效率。本研究为DRG支付改革的进一步实施提供了实证支持,并为优化中国医疗支付体系提供了政策建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b0/12170532/b85edeb9f821/fpubh-13-1563204-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b0/12170532/bb6e37ad3c19/fpubh-13-1563204-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b0/12170532/7d3138142404/fpubh-13-1563204-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b0/12170532/b85edeb9f821/fpubh-13-1563204-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b0/12170532/bb6e37ad3c19/fpubh-13-1563204-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b0/12170532/7d3138142404/fpubh-13-1563204-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b0/12170532/b85edeb9f821/fpubh-13-1563204-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of DRG payment reform on inpatient costs for different surgery types: an empirical analysis based on Chinese tertiary hospitals.疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)付费改革对不同手术类型住院费用的影响:基于中国三级医院的实证分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;13:1563204. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563204. eCollection 2025.
2
The implementation effect of DIP payment method across different population in Southwest China based on multi-group interrupt time series.基于多组中断时间序列的中国西南地区不同人群DIP支付方式实施效果
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 2;13:1572475. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1572475. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluation of the effect of DRG payment policy based on interrupted time series modeling: evidence from a tertiary hospital in Anhui Province.基于中断时间序列模型的疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)支付政策效果评估:来自安徽省某三级医院的证据
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01255-y.
4
Analysis of the impact of China Healthcare Security diagnosis-related groups payment reform on the hospitalization costs for uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in obstructive sleep apnea patients at Hospital C.中国医疗保障疾病诊断相关分组付费改革对 C 医院阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者悬雍垂腭咽成形术住院费用的影响分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 30;24(1):1514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11997-8.
5
Impact of Intravenous Iron Replacement Therapy on Healthcare Costs for Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia in the USA: A Retrospective Analysis.静脉铁剂替代疗法对美国缺铁性贫血患者医疗费用的影响:一项回顾性分析。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2025 May 30. doi: 10.1007/s40801-025-00496-9.
6
Do the diagnosis-related group payment reforms have a negative impact?-an empirical study from Western China.诊断相关分组付费改革是否有负面影响?——来自中国西部的实证研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 11;13:1550480. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1550480. eCollection 2025.
7
Surgical approaches for inserting hemiarthroplasty of the hip in people with hip fractures.髋部骨折患者行半髋关节置换术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 13;6(6):CD016031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016031.
8
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in hospitalized children.促进住院儿童睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 15;6(6):CD012908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012908.pub2.
9
Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Cluster Headache and Migraine: A Health Technology Assessment.用于丛集性头痛和偏头痛的非侵入性迷走神经刺激:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2025 May 1;25(2):1-177. eCollection 2025.
10
Hospital Volume and Social Determinants of Health Do Not Impact Outcomes in Fenestrated Visceral Segment Endovascular Aortic Repair for Patients Treated at VQI Centers.医院手术量和健康的社会决定因素对在VQI中心接受治疗的患者进行开窗内脏段血管腔内主动脉修复术的预后没有影响。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2025 Aug;59(6):584-593. doi: 10.1177/15385744251330017. Epub 2025 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Advances in Difference-in-differences Methods for Policy Evaluation Research.差异中的差异方法在政策评估研究中的进展。
Epidemiology. 2024 Sep 1;35(5):628-637. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001755. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
2
Impacts of DRG-Based Prepayment Reform on the Cost and Quality of Patients with Neurologic Disorders: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Analysis in Beijing, China.基于疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)的预付费改革对神经系统疾病患者成本和质量的影响:来自中国北京一项准实验分析的证据
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Jun 11;17:1547-1560. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S458005. eCollection 2024.
3
How does diagnosis-related group payment impact the health care received by rural residents? Lessons learned from China.
按疾病诊断相关分组付费对农村居民所获医疗服务的影响如何?来自中国的经验教训。
Public Health. 2024 Jul;232:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 May 14.
4
Statistical Insight into China's Indigenous Diagnosis-Related-Group System Evolution.对中国本土诊断相关分组系统演变的统计洞察
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 15;11(22):2965. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11222965.
5
Impacts of a new diagnosis-related group point payment system on children's medical services in China: Length of stay and costs.一种新的诊断相关分组点数付费系统对中国儿童医疗服务的影响:住院时长与费用
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2024 Mar;39(2):432-446. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3739. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
6
The impacts of public hospital comprehensive reform policies on hospital medicine cost, revenues and healthcare expenditures 2014-2019: An analysis of 103 tertiary public hospitals in China.2014 - 2019年公立医院综合改革政策对医院药品成本、收入及医疗支出的影响:对中国103家三级公立医院的分析
Front Health Serv. 2023 Mar 7;3:1079370. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1079370. eCollection 2023.
7
Application of Grey Relational Entropy Weight Method in DRG Performance Evaluation of Inpatient Departments.灰色关联熵权法在住院部 DRG 绩效评价中的应用。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 10;2022:7348985. doi: 10.1155/2022/7348985. eCollection 2022.
8
Are costs derived from diagnosis-related groups suitable for use in economic evaluations? A comparison across nine European countries in the European Healthcare and Social Cost Database.基于诊断相关分组的费用适用于经济评估吗?来自欧洲医疗保健和社会成本数据库中 9 个欧洲国家的比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Dec;23(9):1563-1575. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01444-y. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
9
Best Practice Guidelines for Propensity Score Methods in Medical Research: Consideration on Theory, Implementation, and Reporting. A Review.医学研究中倾向评分法的最佳实践指南:理论、实施和报告的考虑。综述。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Feb;38(2):632-642. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.06.037. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
10
Confounding and regression adjustment in difference-in-differences studies.双重差分法中的混杂因素和回归调整。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):932-941. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13666. Epub 2021 May 12.