Students' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 15;24(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06489-w.
Given the increasing incidence of negative outcomes during pregnancy, our research team conducted a dose-response systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between ultra-processed foods (UPFs) consumption and common adverse pregnancy outcomes including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia (PE), preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA) infants. UPFs are described as formulations of food substances often modified by chemical processes and then assembled into ready-to-consume hyper-palatable food and drink products using flavors, colors, emulsifiers, and other cosmetic additives. Examples include savory snacks, reconstituted meat products, frozen meals that have already been made, and soft drinks.
A comprehensive search was performed using the Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases up to December 2023. We pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model.
Our analysis (encompassing 54 studies with 552,686 individuals) revealed a significant association between UPFs intake and increased risks of GDM (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27; I = 77.5%; p < 0.001; studies = 44; number of participants = 180,824), PE (RR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.59; I = 80.0%; p = 0.025; studies = 12; number of participants = 54,955), while no significant relationships were found for PTB, LBW and SGA infants. Importantly, a 100 g increment in UPFs intake was related to a 27% increase in GDM risk (RR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.51; I = 81.0%; p = 0.007; studies = 9; number of participants = 39,812). The non-linear dose-response analysis further indicated a positive, non-linear relationship between UPFs intake and GDM risk P = 0.034, P = 0.034), although no such relationship was observed for PE (P = 0.696, P = 0.812).
In summary, both prior to and during pregnancy, chronic and excessive intake of UPFs is associated with an increased risk of GDM and PE. However, further observational studies, particularly among diverse ethnic groups with precise UPFs consumption measurement tools, are imperative for a more comprehensive understanding.
鉴于怀孕期间不良结局的发生率不断上升,我们的研究团队进行了一项剂量-反应系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查超加工食品(UPFs)的摄入与常见不良妊娠结局之间的关系,包括妊娠糖尿病(GDM)、先兆子痫(PE)、早产(PTB)、低出生体重(LBW)和小于胎龄儿(SGA)。UPFs 被描述为食品物质的配方,通常通过化学过程进行修饰,然后使用香料、颜色、乳化剂和其他化妆品添加剂组合成即食的超美味食品和饮料产品。例如,咸味小吃、重组肉产品、已制成的冷冻餐和软饮料。
我们使用 Scopus、PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了全面搜索,截至 2023 年 12 月。我们使用随机效应模型汇总相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
我们的分析(包括 54 项研究,涉及 552686 人)表明,UPFs 摄入与 GDM(RR=1.19;95%CI:1.10,1.27;I=77.5%;p<0.001;研究=44;参与者人数=180824)、PE(RR=1.28;95%CI:1.03,1.59;I=80.0%;p=0.025;研究=12;参与者人数=54955)风险增加之间存在显著关联,而与 PTB、LBW 和 SGA 婴儿无显著关联。重要的是,UPFs 摄入量增加 100 克与 GDM 风险增加 27%相关(RR=1.27;95%CI:1.07,1.51;I=81.0%;p=0.007;研究=9;参与者人数=39812)。非线性剂量-反应分析进一步表明,UPFs 摄入与 GDM 风险之间存在正相关、非线性关系(P=0.034,P=0.034),尽管在 PE 中未观察到这种关系(P=0.696,P=0.812)。
总之,无论是在怀孕前还是怀孕期间,慢性和过量摄入 UPFs 与 GDM 和 PE 风险增加有关。然而,进一步的观察性研究,特别是在具有精确 UPFs 消费测量工具的不同种族群体中,对于更全面的了解至关重要。