Giannelli Robert, Stevens Jeffrey, Kinsey John S, Kittelson David, Zelenyuk Alla, Howard Robert, Forde Mary, Hoffman Brandon, Leggett Cullen, Maeroff Bruce, Bies Nick, Swanson Jacob, Suski Kaitlyn, Payne Gregory, Manin Julien, Frazee Richard, Onasch Timothy B, Freedman Andrew, Khalek Imad, Badshah Huzeifa, Preece Daniel, Premnath Vinay, Agnew Scott
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, National Vehicle and Fuels Emissions Laboratory, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Shu Research LLC, Mebane, NC 27302, Formerly U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA.
J Aerosol Sci. 2024 May;178:1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106352.
The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency in collaboration with the U. S. Air Force Arnold Engineering Development Complex conducted the VAriable Response In Aircraft nvPM Testing (VARIAnT) 3 and 4 test campaigns to compare nonvolatile particulate matter (nvPM) emissions measurements from a variety of diffusion flame combustion aerosol sources (DFCASs), including a Cummins diesel engine, a diesel powered generator, two gas turbine start carts, a J85-GE-5 turbojet engine burning multiple fuels, and a Mini-CAST soot generator. The VARIAnT research program was devised to understand reported variability in the ARP6320A sampling system nvPM measurements. The VARIAnT research program has conducted four test campaigns to date with the VARIAnT 3 and 4 campaigns devoted to: (1) assessing the response of three different black carbon mass analyzers to particles of different size, morphology, and chemical composition; (2) characterizing the particles generated by 6 different combustion sources according to morphology, effective density, and chemical composition; and (3) assessing any significant difference between black carbon as determined by the 3 mass analyzers and the total PM determined via other techniques. Results from VARIAnT 3 and 4 campaigns revealed agreement of about 20% between the Micro-Soot Sensor, the Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift (CAPS PM) monitor and the thermal-optical reference method for elemental carbon (EC) mass, independent of the calibration source used. For the LII-300, the measured mass concentrations in VARIAnT 3 fall within 18% and in VARIAnT 4 fall within 27% of the reference EC mass concentration when calibrated on a combustor rig in VARIAnT 3 and on an LGT-60 start cart in VARIAnT 4, respectively. It was also found that the three mass instrument types (MSS, CAPS PM, and LII-300) can exhibit different BC to reference EC ratios depending on the emission source that appear to correlate to particle geometric mean mobility diameter, morphology, or some other parameter associated with particle geometric mean diameter (GMD) with the LII-300 showing a slightly stronger apparent trend with GMD. Systematic differences in LII-300 measured mass concentrations have been reduced by calibrating with a turbine combustion as a particle source (combustor or turbine engine). With respect to the particle size measurements, the sizing instruments (TSI SMPS, TSI EEPS, and Cambustion DMS 500) were found to be in general agreement in terms of size distributions and concentrations with some exceptions. Gravimetric measurements of the total aerosol mass produced by the various DFCAs differed from the reference EC, BC and integrated particle size distribution measured aerosol masses. The measurements of particle size distributions and single particle analysis performed using the miniSPLAT indicated the presence of larger particles (≳150 nm) having more compact morphologies, higher effective density, and a composition dominated by OC and containing ash. This increased large particle fraction is also associated with higher values of single scattering albedo measured by the CAPS PM instrument and higher OC measurements. These measurements indicate gas turbine engine emissions can be a more heterogeneous mix of particle types beyond the original E-31 assumption that engine exit exhaust particles are mainly composed of black carbon.
美国环境保护局与美国空军阿诺德工程发展综合体合作开展了飞机可变响应非挥发性颗粒物测试(VARIAnT)3和4测试活动,以比较来自各种扩散火焰燃烧气溶胶源(DFCASs)的非挥发性颗粒物(nvPM)排放测量结果,这些源包括一台康明斯柴油发动机、一台柴油发电机、两辆燃气轮机启动车、一台燃烧多种燃料的J85-GE-5涡轮喷气发动机以及一台小型CAST烟尘发生器。VARIAnT研究项目旨在了解ARP6320A采样系统nvPM测量中报告的变异性。VARIAnT研究项目迄今为止已开展了四次测试活动,其中VARIAnT 3和4活动致力于:(1)评估三种不同的黑碳质量分析仪对不同尺寸、形态和化学成分颗粒的响应;(2)根据形态、有效密度和化学成分对6种不同燃烧源产生的颗粒进行表征;(3)评估三种质量分析仪测定的黑碳与通过其他技术测定的总颗粒物之间的任何显著差异。VARIAnT 3和4活动的结果显示,微型烟尘传感器、腔衰荡相移(CAPS PM)监测仪与元素碳(EC)质量的热光参考方法之间的一致性约为20%,与所使用的校准源无关。对于LII-300,当分别在VARIAnT 3中的燃烧器试验台和VARIAnT 4中的LGT-60启动车上校准时,VARIAnT 3中测量的质量浓度在参考EC质量浓度的18%以内,VARIAnT 4中在27%以内。还发现,三种质量仪器类型(MSS、CAPS PM和LII-300)根据排放源的不同,可能会表现出不同的黑碳与参考EC比率,这似乎与颗粒几何平均迁移直径、形态或与颗粒几何平均直径(GMD)相关的其他参数有关,其中LII-300与GMD的明显趋势稍强。通过使用涡轮燃烧作为颗粒源(燃烧器或涡轮发动机)进行校准,LII-300测量质量浓度的系统差异已有所减小。关于颗粒尺寸测量,尺寸测量仪器(TSI SMPS、TSI EEPS和Cambustion DMS 500)在尺寸分布和浓度方面总体上是一致的,但也有一些例外。各种DFCA产生的总气溶胶质量的重量法测量结果与参考EC、BC以及综合颗粒尺寸分布测量的气溶胶质量不同。使用miniSPLAT进行的颗粒尺寸分布测量和单颗粒分析表明,存在较大颗粒(≳150 nm),其形态更致密,有效密度更高,成分以有机碳为主且含有灰分。这种较大颗粒比例的增加还与CAPS PM仪器测量的单次散射反照率较高值以及有机碳测量值较高有关。这些测量表明,燃气轮机发动机排放的颗粒类型可能比最初的E-31假设更加异质,即发动机排气口的排气颗粒主要由黑碳组成。