Kittelson D B, Swanson J, Aldridge M, Giannelli R A, Kinsey J S, Stevens J A, Liscinsky D S, Hagen D, Leggett C, Stephens K, Hoffman B, Howard R, Frazee R W, Silvis W, McArthur T, Lobo P, Achterberg S, Trueblood M, Thomson K, Wolff L, Cerully K, Onasch T, Miake-Lye R, Freedman A, Bachalo W, Payne G
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
National Vehicle and Fuels Emissions Laboratory, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Aerosol Sci Technol. 2021 Nov 8;56(1):63-74. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2021.1971152.
A sampling system for measuring emissions of nonvolatile particulate matter (nvPM) from aircraft gas turbine engines has been developed to replace the use of smoke number and is used for international regulatory purposes. This sampling system can be up to 35 m in length. The sampling system length in addition to the volatile particle remover (VPR) and other sampling system components lead to substantial particle losses, which are a function of the particle size distribution, ranging from 50 to 90% for particle number concentrations and 10-50% for particle mass concentrations. The particle size distribution is dependent on engine technology, operating point, and fuel composition. Any nvPM emissions measurement bias caused by the sampling system will lead to unrepresentative emissions measurements which limit the method as a universal metric. Hence, a method to estimate size dependent sampling system losses using the system parameters and the measured mass and number concentrations was also developed (SAE 2017; SAE 2019). An assessment of the particle losses in two principal components used in ARP6481 (SAE 2019) was conducted during the VAriable Response In Aircraft nvPM Testing (VARIAnT) 2 campaign. Measurements were made on the 25-meter sample line portion of the system using multiple, well characterized particle sizing instruments to obtain the penetration efficiencies. An agreement of ± 15% was obtained between the measured and the ARP6481 method penetrations for the 25-meter sample line portion of the system. Measurements of VPR penetration efficiency were also made to verify its performance for aviation nvPM number. The research also demonstrated the difficulty of making system loss measurements and substantiates the E-31 decision to predict rather than measure system losses.
已开发出一种用于测量飞机燃气涡轮发动机非挥发性颗粒物(nvPM)排放的采样系统,以取代烟雾数的使用,并用于国际监管目的。该采样系统长度可达35米。采样系统的长度,加上挥发性颗粒去除器(VPR)和其他采样系统组件,会导致大量颗粒损失,这是颗粒尺寸分布的函数,颗粒数浓度的损失范围为50%至90%,颗粒质量浓度的损失范围为10%至50%。颗粒尺寸分布取决于发动机技术、运行点和燃料成分。采样系统引起的任何nvPM排放测量偏差都会导致不具代表性的排放测量结果,这限制了该方法作为通用指标的应用。因此,还开发了一种使用系统参数以及测量的质量和数量浓度来估计与尺寸相关的采样系统损失的方法(SAE 2017;SAE 2019)。在飞机nvPM可变响应测试(VARIAnT)2活动期间,对ARP6481(SAE 2019)中使用的两个主要组件中的颗粒损失进行了评估。使用多个特征明确的颗粒尺寸测量仪器,在系统的25米采样线部分进行测量,以获得穿透效率。对于系统的25米采样线部分,测量的穿透率与ARP6481方法的穿透率之间的一致性在±15%以内。还对VPR穿透效率进行了测量,以验证其对航空nvPM数量的性能。该研究还证明了进行系统损失测量的难度,并证实了E-31决定预测而非测量系统损失的合理性。